Does this smake all the people who already just carry guns on them regardless of the laws legal now?  haha

Does this smake all the people who already just carry guns on them regardless of the laws legal now?  haha

I don't know ow how those technicalities work but I sure won't be the first one to try!

they filed a motion to extend time

Perhaps they need more time to find a better attorney.

Hahahahaha I knew it.

they filed a motion to extend time

So they're asking for 45 more days, until 9/15? If that motion gets granted, what does that mean exactly?
The Hawaii court has to rehear the case by 9/15? Sorry, not trying to be ignorant, but legal jargon and procedure confuses me. 
Lol, trying to not get my hopes up but at the same time I'd like to know what's happening, what's ahead, timeframes ( hopefully not another 6 years), etc.

So they're asking for 45 more days, until 9/15? If that motion gets granted, what does that mean exactly?
The Hawaii court has to rehear the case by 9/15? Sorry, not trying to be ignorant, but legal jargon and procedure confuses me. 
Lol, trying to not get my hopes up but at the same time I'd like to know what's happening, what's ahead, timeframes ( hopefully not another 6 years), etc.

County is asking until Sept 15 to file a new brief asking the full court to rehear the case

2a activism meeting on August 18th.  Learn how you can help this case.

https://2ahawaii.com/index.php?topic=31972.0

More derp from our judges.  They assume the NRA is behind this case because the attorneys are from the mainland.  They dont know the attorney is originally from Hawaii and the NRA ignored the Young case.

Hawaii’s limits on open carry of guns won’t change soon, former justice says

....“It looks to me like an NRA (National Rifle Association) project,” he said. “I don’t know if it is or isn’t,” but he noted the lawyers representing plaintiffs in this and another pending case before the 9th Circuit Court regarding civilians carrying Tasers are from the mainland.

....“As a judge I was a great fan of our gun control laws,” he said. “I don’t want to see Tombstone, Arizona, and Dodge City, Kansas, under Wyatt Earp anymore, but that’s the way it is in a lot of states. Ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court will tell us.”


http://www.staradvertiser.com/2018/08/02/hawaii-news/hawaiis-limits-on-open-carry-of-guns-wont-change-soon-former-justice-says/?HSA=a2338a946ec4e95586ef10a1e5e0e55908b896ab

As a judge, his job is to make rulings on what is constitutionally right, not make laws based on his personal feelings.

What difference does it make it if it's an "NRA Project" or not.  Sounds like ignorance at first glace, but I'm betting it's getting the NRA name out there to mobilize those who are rabidly anti-NRA, anti-Trump, etc. 

the court granted a sept 14 extension

and to confirm I have nothing to do with the NRA

As a judge, his job is to make rulings on what is constitutionally right, not make laws based on his personal feelings.

Stop it, you're killing me...........

So there going to request an En Banc hearing? So possibly 2+ more years. 

I stand by my prediction stated earlier, 3 to 7 years.

Pretty cool article about Young and Beck.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-guns-hawaii/unlikely-pair-could-usher-gun-rights-case-to-u-s-supreme-court-idUSKBN1KT13B

Wow, got coverage by The Gun Collective

Another good video:

new free beacon article
"George is a good man," he said. "The federal court system isn't just for big businesses. It should be for everyone. I feel strongly he at least needed to be allowed to be heard, especially over something like the Second Amendment. You know, he's complaining about his constitutional rights, and they're not even letting him show up."
https://freebeacon.com/politics/meet-native-hawaiian-army-veteran-just-won-major-gun-carry-case/

Charles Nichols 8-minute podcast on Young v Hawaii, including how it has been binding precedent since the day it was published and still no attorney has filed for a TRO/Preliminary Injunction that would force the filed-against attorneys general of any state in the Ninth Circuit to conform to the open carry requirement of the decision.

http://blog.californiarighttocarry.org/?page_id=8372

I've written SAF, NRA, and GOA asking why they have not filed such actions. Only got a response from SAF, which hinted, after first wrongly claiming that Young has been appealed en banc, that they have some "double secret probation" strategy in the works. Sure they do. Let me guess. Amicus brief? They won't tell me. Since all those "gun rights organizations" oppose open carry (see their actual filings and oral arguments in Peruta and Richards), maybe they'll file an amicus for the defense?

Charles Nichols podcast #2, almost 16 minutes focusing again on Young v Hawaii with detailed consideration of the possibilities regarding en banc petition. Yeah, 16 minutes. Only for weed dwellers and revelers (the "legal details", not "cannabis"  ). But makes clear why the petition for en banc is not a "done deal", as some of the possible negative outcomes for the appellees (state and county, et al) are outlined. Also mentioned that there are four other similar cases in other circuits where things actually get done in a timely manner that could easily get to SCOTUS before Young (and thus before Nichols) which would stay Young/Nichols pending the SCOTUS decision in one of those cases (were any of them granted cert of course).