Used to watch the world news on channel 6 and 3 and majority is about Trump negatives.

Watching in Taiwan its actuall world stuff. Freedom of speech protest in Uganda, venusuala, Nigeria. Corupt officials and CEOs from Japan, S. Korea, China. And yes YELLOW VEST movement still going strong 1 month later.

Only thing Taiwan news said about Trump was that his meeting with Kim Jong is done and trade war with China. Nothing negative (fake news).

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

He didn't write the statement that he gave, but I'm sure he added his 2 cents in.  That part about denying certain stories was inputted just to fool the public and give him some credibility.  Which it seems like it worked.  We need to think deeper at the facts to see if he is credible or not.  Here is why I won't believe anything he says now:

1) Lied under oath previously
2) Disbarred attorney
3) Felon
4) His attorney is a long time Clinton friend/attorney
5) Spoke to DNC members prior to hearing
6) If he did have any important intel, he must have already given it to Mueller, or he would have another perjury charge
7) Most of what he said is un-provable (Trump is a racist, Trump is conning the US, etc...)
Going to jail and struct a plea deal
9) Prior to getting in trouble, worked for Trump for 10+ years.  If he was such a criminal/racist/homophobe, why didn't he cut him off after the 1st year or less
10) Has "evidence" (checks) for payments.  If Trump was paying for something illegal, then he would pay cash and not a check (Enter Jussie Smolette).  Why didn't he call the police at that time?  It's common for rich people to pay their attorneys retainers so that they can handle what ever comes their way.  Rich/powerful people get lawsuits all the time and don't have the time to deal with it.  So they give their attorney payments and say you handle what ever comes my way within X amount of dollars.  BTW Stormi lost her case against Trump and now owes him money.  Art of the Deal.

So 1 of the above alone doesn't give much to someones credibility, but when you add them all together, you have to question it.  Same thing went with Christine Ford and her accusations against Kav.  Oh BTW, where is she now?  How come she's not pursuing anything?  Where did her $1,000,000 GoFundMe go to?

Ford made accusarions the same way that Cohen is doing and the left jumps on it like a bitch in heat because its Trump/ Trump related.

If Kav did what she claims. Why no follow up for justice. 6 women till this day are still fighting for justice that Clinton raped them. But you wont see them on any headlines.

So like Ford. Cohen will dissapear once he is out of the spot light even though he has evidence of illegal things Trump has done.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

BTW if he did have any credible intel, he would have given it to Mueller and them told to shut his mouth about it. If he didnt give it to Mueller and had more intel, then another purjury charge.

So the DNC is once again using someone to sell a story to try and derail the train and his supporters

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Not necessarily. If the evidence isn't relevant to what Mueller was investigating then he would have no obligation to turn it over.



As for Ford the media stopped covering her but that doesn't mean it just went away as if it were some story conjured up. But as I said it is past the statute of limitations so really she did all she can do. That doesn't indicate some conspiracy or anything.

You mean Mueller would not pursue anything not Russia related and charge anyone?

Try and find what Ford is doing now. Last i checked she was remodeling her home with the paritial gofundme $1,000,000 that she received. Has she hired an attorney to pursue any case against Kav? Like how the 6 Clinton accussors have?  Or like how that Cory kid has been trying for years to prove he was and many others molsteded as a child by hollywood elite? Where is Ford?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

If Mueller came across evidence that Trump did something else he would be obligated to pursue it or hand it to another agency to pursue but what I was getting at is that an agreement between Mueller and Cohen was likely for evidence pertaining to a specific type of crimes. Now of course I haven't read the details of the crime but I doubt the agreement simply stated that Cohen must tell Mueller about any crime Trump ever committed. The other aspect is that Cohen could have evidence of something that is not criminal and thus really wouldn't concern Mueller. He might have some evidence of a civil nature or evidence to something about Trump's character.

Again, she has no case against Kavanaugh, it is past the statute of limitations so there would be no reason to hire an attorney. But her not being in the news isn't evidence of anything, the story ran its course, there is nothing more to keep reporting on, unless maybe you want TMZ type coverage.

2016 video shows Michael Cohen lied to Congress about
not wanting a Trump administration job

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2016-video-suggests-michael-cohen-lied-about-not-wanting-a-job-with-the-trump-administration

I know exactlly what Ford is doing (research). And there is only 1 reason why the fake news doesnt talk about her anymore. Nor is she pursuing any type or suit on Kav or protest for other "victims" to come forward and be heard for all sex assault.

That really wouldn't fly for a perjury charge though

That's an opinion.

Please explain.  Making an untrue statement of fact to Congress is the very definition of perjury.

"To prove perjury, you must show that someone intentionally lied under oath."

And the committee members who referred Cohen to the DOJ for additional counts of perjury included that specific lie.

They wouldn't include it in the referral if they didn't think it wasn't applicable.

Cohen was asking about a WH job through many people, and he's ON VIDEO say he expected to be offered a job there, since he was "The President's Lawyer".  He lied to Congress saying he never sought a job under the President.

A lie is a lie. Does Perjury have another meaning?