Conspiracy theories have weak evidence. If more evidence is found it no longer has weak evidence and starts to exit the realm of conspiracy theory. Lack of evidence is not a sign of evidence.
Because you say so?
You lecturing us about everything. So comical.
You didn't read my other post, nor answer the question.
A CONSPIRACY can exist without evidence of the conspiracy making it into the public domain. That doesn't relegate the theory of what happened to the "realm of conspiracy theory."
The FBI testified this week they had a whistle blower from China who was interviewed in NY for 9 hours in Spring 2020. He (FBI Dir Wray) refused to give Congress the details of the interview because it's an ongoing investigation. So, while the evidence may exist, it might be withheld by the authorities ... the SAME AUTHORITIES who allowed the Wuhan Lab explanation to be labeled a conspiracy theory.
You can't possibly have access to all the EVIDENCE that proves a conspiracy theory real, nor can you have access to all the evidence that proves one theory over another. You only have what the Democrat-controlled media allows us to see unless someone decides to ruin their own life and make the truth public.
You're making judgements based on unknown and imperfect data, but for some reason you believe your conclusions are correct. Facts which were closely controlled by a few doesn't mean the facts don't exist. You were manipulated into believing a false narrative and then arguing once the truth came out that "well, we didn't know all the facts." Someone does know, and people with common sense can deduce what really happened.
Of course, you want the deductions to stand up in court.
Why do we even bother trying to explain simple reality to someone like you? Maybe you need to stop being so opinionated and start having an open mind. Not everyone you disagree with is "stupid."