My first question when I see these kinds of stories is always: "Who on the government side is responsible for certifying this software and testing changes? Do they have any sort of test and evaluation procedures that involve actually running test ballots that simulate all possible types of errors as well as valid ballots? How else would they know the system is working as expected?"
Maybe THIS is how they expected it to work: in their favor!
I know a little bit about software. I can design operating systems, compilers, computer languages, et al.
My favorite type of computer stuff is "real time" systems design.
A fuck up there and bad things happen FAST!
There was no "error", your design is typically tested by many people whose job is to "break"
your design. Actually it is not all that hard to make a design that is virtually un-traceable, if you wanted to
do bad things, but that is a one time use sort of thing.
So this is all BS!
They made a system that cheats and Democrats love it. Because it is not who votes that count,
it is who counts the votes that matter.