Young v. Hawaii (Read 2898 times)

omnigun

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #20 on: March 24, 2021, 04:43:27 PM »
please show me where anyone said that wouldn't be a better outcome...

"Majority said there is no right outside the home.  Which is a good thing."

macsak

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #21 on: March 24, 2021, 05:17:18 PM »
"Majority said there is no right outside the home.  Which is a good thing."

that's not
please show me where anyone said that wouldn't be a better outcome...

omnigun

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #22 on: March 24, 2021, 05:29:37 PM »
that's not
please show me where anyone said that wouldn't be a better outcome...

No where, but to claim that a loss is a good outcome....
That infers out of all outcomes this one is better than the majority. 

robtmc

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #23 on: March 24, 2021, 06:26:33 PM »
.

changemyoil66

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #24 on: March 24, 2021, 06:41:00 PM »

But wouldn't a better outcome be if the courts decided right then and there that there is a right to bear arms outside the home?  This just delays/kicks the issue down the road.  SCOTUS in no way is even a remote guarantee that the case will be heard and until then we can't carry.
Captain obvious.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

changemyoil66

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #25 on: March 24, 2021, 06:43:43 PM »
"Majority said there is no right outside the home.  Which is a good thing."
Focus, read my follow up post to your question.

If you still feel your same comment applies, read mine again. Then again and again.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

macsak

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #26 on: March 24, 2021, 07:05:41 PM »
No where, but to claim that a loss is a good outcome....
That infers out of all outcomes this one is better than the majority.

making assumptions, as usual
and wrong, as usual...

macsak

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #27 on: March 24, 2021, 07:06:28 PM »
Focus, read my follow up post to your question.

If you still feel your same comment applies, read mine again. Then again and again.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

reading is not it's issue
comprehension is...

omnigun

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #28 on: March 24, 2021, 08:07:12 PM »
Focus, read my follow up post to your question.

If you still feel your same comment applies, read mine again. Then again and again.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Nope your comment clears it up,  but mac is referring to my post before said comment.  But mac is always correct  :shake:

hvybarrels

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
  • Total likes: 819
  • board waxed - powder dry
  • Referrals: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #29 on: March 24, 2021, 08:15:22 PM »
Supreme Court cannot dodge this issue forever, and the amendment is very clear

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #30 on: March 24, 2021, 08:33:34 PM »
Nope your comment clears it up,  but mac is referring to my post before said comment.  But mac is always correct  :shake:

Why does every thread devolve into being about YOU?

It's simple.  "Good" is a relative adjective based in this case on someone's opinion.  There may be better, and best, outcomes, but this one is NOT BAD -- hence good.

Stop turning everything into an opinion debate.  You asked how is it good?  The question was answered.  Agree or not, arguing about what you said and what others meant is creating just another cluster fuck.

 :stopjack:
Surely Not Everybody Was Kung Fu Fighting.

punaperson

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #31 on: March 25, 2021, 07:30:58 AM »
I guess the Ninth just wants to stick it in the face of Justice Thomas:

"I find it extremely improbable that the Framers understood the Second Amendment to protect little more than carrying a gun from the bedroom to the kitchen."

changemyoil66

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #32 on: March 25, 2021, 08:35:32 AM »
I've been reading comments on other IG pages and many are sayiing the 9th circuit has a history of having many of their rulings overturned.  Can anyone confirm?

Mdotweber

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #33 on: March 25, 2021, 08:56:06 AM »
I've been reading comments on other IG pages and many are sayiing the 9th circuit has a history of having many of their rulings overturned.  Can anyone confirm?

The activist judges on the ninth will purposely pass judgment on cases they know will get overturned. Some of them even brag about it, they are idealist that take advantage of the long appeals process...justice delayed is justice denied.
"Dont forget, incoming fire has the right of way"-Clint Smith?

RSN172

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #34 on: March 25, 2021, 09:19:03 AM »
But Mazie just said on this morning news we don't want to take your guns away. We just want sensible gun laws.

Which means  we want to take your guns away.

QUIETShooter

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #35 on: March 25, 2021, 09:32:07 AM »
But Mazie just said on this morning news we don't want to take your guns away. We just want sensible gun laws.

Which means  we want to take your guns away.

Many people want sensible politicians (except the people of Hawaii.)

Mazie needs to go away.  Far, far away.
Sometimes you gotta know when to save your bullets.

Inspector

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10447
  • Total likes: 1580
  • MASS ELECTION FRAUD OCCURRED!!!
  • Referrals: 6
    • View Profile
Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #36 on: March 25, 2021, 09:58:11 AM »
I've been reading comments on other IG pages and many are sayiing the 9th circuit has a history of having many of their rulings overturned.  Can anyone confirm?

These stats are from Politifact and their left wing sources so take these with a grain of salt, however. Also, these numbers are 4-5 years old so they be slightly different now. I do believe these to be correct or close enough from my memory of a couple of years ago. I would think that 79% is a very high percentage of rulings turned over by SCOTUS.

The 9th Circuit’s reversal rate is higher than average, but it’s not the absolute highest among the circuit courts. That distinction goes to the 6th Circuit, which serves Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky and Tennessee, with an 87 percent average between 2010-15.  The 9th Circuit is in third place.

1. 6th Circuit - 87 percent;

2. 11th Circuit - 85 percent;

3. 9th Circuit - 79 percent;

4. 3rd Circuit - 78 percent;

5. 2nd Circuit and Federal Circuit - 68 percent;

6. 8th Circuit - 67 percent;

7. 5th Circuit - 66 percent;

8. 7th Circuit - 48 percent;

9. DC Circuit - 45 percent;

10. 1st Circuit and 4th Circuit - 43 percent;

11. 10th Circuit - 42 percent.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/feb/10/sean-hannity/no-9th-circuit-isnt-most-overturned-court-country-/
« Last Edit: March 25, 2021, 11:17:31 AM by Inspector »
MASS ELECTION FRAUD OCCURRED!!! - 99.9% OF ALL 2A MEMBERS AGREE!!!
THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN!!! - THE EVIDENCE PROVES IT!!!
TRUMP IS THE REAL PRESIDENT!!! - BIDEN IS A FRAUD!!!
MASKS DON’T WORK!!! - THE REAL SCIENCE PROVES IT!!!!
LOCKDOWNS DON’T WORK!!! THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF!!!

robtmc

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #37 on: March 25, 2021, 10:15:26 AM »
Why does every thread devolve into being about YOU?
Because she is a very insecure little twit that needs constant affirmation?

robtmc

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #38 on: March 25, 2021, 10:17:23 AM »
1. 6th Circuit - 87 percent;

2. 11th Circuit - 85 percent;

3. 9th Circuit - 79 percent;

4. 3rd Circuit - 78 percent;

5. 2nd Circuit and Federal Circuit - 68 percent;

6. 8th Circuit - 67 percent;

A pertinent question might be:  are those courts stuffed with judges that out of sync or ignorant of Constitutional law?

Or, are they just political hacks doing the business the oligarchy wants them to do?

aletheuo137

Re: Young v. Hawaii
« Reply #39 on: March 25, 2021, 11:12:45 AM »
Because she is a very insecure little twit that needs constant affirmation?
Sounds like someone we know!
Yo' momma!

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk