Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Kalihi Uka

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 59
1
Political Discussion / Re: Canada Screams We're Beating Trump
« on: September 04, 2026, 09:29:17 PM »
"Hypocrisy at its finest?"

I think

"Fertilizer at its finest"

Is more accurate.





2
Off Topic / Re: "Safe spaces" at UH
« on: September 01, 2026, 02:03:56 PM »
Apparently, some kids feel the need for quiet time nowadays.
I have a lot to say about this topic, but I'll just keep my mouth shut. SMH
==========
Sensory-friendly spaces expand to all 10 UH campuses https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/video/2026/08/31/sensory-friendly-spaces-expand-all-10-uh-campuses/
UH is really into "Safe Zones."

For years they've had these LBGTQ@*&O7thu49^%7340- posters on individual faculty offices across the campus:



Don't know about you, but it looks to me like it's modeled off of the biohazard symbol ....

... maybe nothing.

3
Political Discussion / Re: Lindsay Clancy
« on: September 01, 2026, 01:49:38 PM »

These Hollywood nut jobs are going to start a TikTok infanticide cult


Billy Bob Thornton must be going to a different barber nowadays.
4
Political Discussion / Re: Lindsay Clancy
« on: September 01, 2026, 01:44:52 PM »
Define a woman.
Not sure what his chances are now, but if he does that, it will absolutely disqualify him from nomination to the Supreme Court.
5
Political Discussion / Re: Lindsay Clancy
« on: September 01, 2026, 11:30:03 AM »
Dude,

that

was

awesome!

Art that is a perfect (and wickedly clever) reflection of the madness of society today.

Thanks!

I love this channel


6
Political Discussion / Re: their true intentions
« on: August 29, 2026, 05:56:31 PM »
was just reflecting, as far as prosperous, modern, developed countries, there's only a handful that have sofar held off the "religion of peace" invasions:  China, Russia, Poland, and Japan, I think.  They don't go after the non-prosperous, backwards, under-developed countries.  Well, actually they do, those are easy pickin's for them, they've already rolled over them.

in that same vein, at the rate the US is progressing, no thanks to democrats, not sure if we'll make it to our 300th birthday, 2076.  The lower-48 might be looking like South Africa by then, the way things are going.  But even South Africa has a few wytepipo-only enclaves, e.g. Orania, Kleinfontain.  Maybe that's what it's going to be, heavily-armed wayciss enclaves?  Thank you 2A.  Maybe by then everybody will have FRT's in their AR's.  Full-Semi-Auto for everybody.  Maybe Glock switches will be deemed to be "in common use".

So, the US morphs into New Pakistan, New India, and New Wakanda.  Who owns the nukes?  Dixie?

What will Hawaii look like?  bought out by the CCP?
Yes, it's exceedingly difficult to see how this evolves in any other way, as the "diseased areas" appear to be effectively locked into a spiral of descent.

It's always the people who make the difference in any place you look at.

This is why the totalitarian globalist/leftist element invests so much into its propaganda machine - diabolically - fully controlling the education system.  Young people are systematically kept ignorant while being relentlessly programmed in belief systems that are inverse to truth and the lessons of human history.

They are operating in a complete alternate reality, that is the real "Matrix" - just listen to NPR or KTUH, etc.  It's mind boggling the care with which they take ALL information and news and recast it into their narrative structure.

Hence, what was always just called a Kona storm is now a "Kona Low."  El Niño, which has been around for - who knows - geologic time, is now a symptom of "Climate Change," etc.

Population areas which are resistant to the indoctrination and death spiral will receive inflows of people who recognize they are behind enemy lines where they are now (but maybe have awesome weather ...), and just don't see any light at the end of the tunnel there.

Diseased population centers will get the opposite flow - programmed bots who realize the Wyoming (or whatever) around them will seemingly never be free of actual Americans, etc.

It's going to be a fight like this for the balance of our lives in this country.

Sadly, about 37% (of the 20% who vote) in Hawaii are actual Americans in heart mind & spirit (I'm not talking about mere politics ...), which makes it so incredibly painful to live here and see the spiral that we can't seem to reverse.

The outflow will continue at an accelerating pace, as their toxic economics and regulation (just a couple of slices of their special care) make it increasingly unlivable here.
7
General Discussion / Re: another successful "buyback"
« on: August 25, 2026, 05:54:44 PM »
Nice

this is the buy-back we need:



8


God addressed the serpent, and said:

"And I shall put hatred between you and the Woman, and between your seed and her seed. He shall tread upon your head and you will strike him in his heel.”

Genesis 3:15


It's all there in front of everyone, and always has been.

I guess it's just a lot more obvious now ...
9
Yes, very well and compactly said - the reality is bare - call it what it is.

When evil men make what is unlawful, into a law, in pursuit of their unlawful and destructive aims, a man has two choices:  Obey and suffer the injury to his body and soul, or recognize them for what they are - mortal enemies - disobey energetically, and turn on them, not stopping until they are ... eliminated.

Such evil people kill others all over this country, every day, everywhere they are given control .  AS A MATTER OF POLICY they do this, as if it is lawful.  There are infinite such examples, right here in Hawaii.

Can you say "Sanctuary City?"

Since it is so - and no wishful thinking or pragmatic compromising will make any difference, make your choice, because you never want to be in this place:

"I wonder how a person will feel if a loved one was severely injured or killed because he had his gun locked up in their vehicle while in these "sensitive" places."

P.S. No one does anything unlawful here.

Speaking of Which

President Donald Trump’s border czar Thursday blasted Gov. Gavin Newsom and the state of California over the death of a 68-year-old Bay Area man allegedly butchered by an illegal immigrant in front of his home.

Tom Homan said on “Fox & Friends” that the elderly Martinez man’s suspected murder wouldn’t have happened if not for politics.

“It’s just politics, a sanctuary jurisdiction. Over a decade, I can think of the hundreds of cases like this that happened. It’s just one case after another after another,” Homan said of California’s “sanctuary city” designation.

“This person’s dead because Governor Newsom and the state of California puts politics — hatred of President Trump — over public safety,” Homan added.

The alleged killer, illegal Venezuelan immigrant Marcos Iriarte-Valdez, 36, who also holds Spanish citizenship, is accused of fatally stabbing retiree Todd Stewart on his front lawn last week, with surveillance footage capturing the horrifying attack.

Homan went off on the fact that Iriarte-Valdez had been released from jail the day before the attack. He had been cut loose by a Newsom-appointed judge after violating the terms of his home detention related to a residential burglary case.

“We did our job. We located this person in their facility. We did an investigation, found out he is an illegal in the United States, has a criminal history, he is deportable, so we issued a detainer, asking them to notify us before they release him,” Homan said.


“There’s nothing against a sanctuary law in California for a deputy to just pick the phone up and just say that, ‘Hey, this guy is being released in a hour,'” he added. “You don’t have to hold him one minute longer than you would normally hold him.”

Story below shows video of this illegal alien monster released by Democrats (instead of given to ICE for deportation) the next day slaughter someone for fun, in broad daylight.

Not like anyone here does not know Democrats are killing people - it's just that in a truly civilized country, they would be prosecuted, at minimum as accessory to murder, and rotting in prison.  Not walking free, not treated as if they were not guilty of these crimes against their country.

That it is not so IS MADNESS.

https://nypost.com/2026/08/08/us-news/horrifying-video-shows-elderly-man-fatally-stabbed-in-norcal/
10
Suzanna Gracia Hupp.

Locked up her gun she usually carries in her purse.  It was the law.

Gunman went on a killing spree in that cafe.  Her father rushed the gunman and got shot.  Her mother died at her husband's side, trying to comfort him as he lay dying.

One can only imagine what this daughter is going through.  Regret doesn't even begin to describe it.
A great American.

Here is her testimony before congress - it's for the ages, and cannot be seen too many times:

11
I wonder how a person will feel if a loved one was severely injured or killed because he had his gun locked up in their vehicle while in these "sensitive" places.

I wonder how many people value their life and the lives of their loved ones over the stupid laws enacted by anti-2nd amendment politicians.

These politicians still don't realize that criminals do not follow the law.
Yes, very well and compactly said - the reality is bare - call it what it is.

When evil men make what is unlawful, into a law, in pursuit of their unlawful and destructive aims, a man has two choices:  Obey and suffer the injury to his body and soul, or recognize them for what they are - mortal enemies - disobey energetically, and turn on them, not stopping until they are ... eliminated.

Such evil people kill others all over this country, every day, everywhere they are given control .  AS A MATTER OF POLICY they do this, as if it is lawful.  There are infinite such examples, right here in Hawaii.

Can you say "Sanctuary City?"

Since it is so - and no wishful thinking or pragmatic compromising will make any difference, make your choice, because you never want to be in this place:

"I wonder how a person will feel if a loved one was severely injured or killed because he had his gun locked up in their vehicle while in these "sensitive" places."

P.S. No one does anything unlawful here.

12

It is legal for a person with a license for civilian concealed carry to transport the weapon with them anywhere (unlike the restrictions of just to and from range, etc. if you don’t have such a license).

Thanks, I was disappointed to see a big dog recommendation from our 2a community but your information is actually useful.  I have a 100lb pitbull and she is a harmless teddy bear.
100lb pitbull girl - you got da best dog in the world brother!

Have a Great Day!
13
Damn was nice to fish in West side without needing to worry about getting mugged or robbed.  Anyone know if there is some grey area if i'm "in the water" and not "on the beach".  If I'm fishing near my truck can I keep my gun in locked container while in sensitive place?
Actually in all seriousness, the prohibition is with respect to carrying the weapon (concealed of course) in these “sensitive” places, as you may hurt their feelings or something.

It is legal for a person with a license for civilian concealed carry to transport the weapon with them anywhere (unlike the restrictions of just to and from range, etc. if you don’t have such a license).

So as long as it is properly stored, I.e. in a lockbox in your truck, it should be perfectly legal to do so in a “sensitive” place.  In fact you have to secure it that way when you enter such special zones, as you can’t leave your weapon unsecured.

There are those here who are much better versed than I, and if I’ve misspoken on the matter they have no problem making me look stupid - I do most of the work for them anyway  :wacko:
14
Political Discussion / Re: "cooter mogging"
« on: August 12, 2026, 04:24:00 PM »
Wow - imagine getting so much they actually nickname you "Cooter"!

... sure explains the grin


15
Two completely opposite schools of thought with respect to the ultimate gun for concealed carry

... which nevertheless agree completely on the desirability of maintaining a high degree of discomfort while doing so.


16
It'll get a couple of hearings, but it's unlikely to pass.  The stores are going to be very opposed to it as it will affect their sales and they're struggling enough as it is.  If it should pass, then there is a strong 1A free speech argument for a lawsuit.  It's government-compelled speech, forcing businesses to take a position on something and removing their option not to say anything at the threat of penalties.

This is related to the recent passage of SB2471 changing business structures so they cannot fund the influence of elections, ie getting around citizens united.  A lawsuit has already been filed saying this law restricts businesses free speech rights.
Thanks very much - it's very encouraging to hear that it is likely a stillborn tyranny - as it very well should be!

Thanks again!
17
Political Discussion / Re: What the yacht?!
« on: August 12, 2026, 09:02:56 AM »

Brah - it's that f*&king Superferry again!
18
Political Discussion / Re: What the yacht?!
« on: August 12, 2026, 08:59:36 AM »
"Ferry operations were suspended in March 2009 after the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that a state law allowing the Superferry to operate without a second complete environmental impact statement was unconstitutional.  The company went bankrupt as a result of these actions preventing service in Hawaii."

'Cause Hawaii - ENTIRELY COMPOSED OF ISLANDS - no can figure out the environmental impact of ....

wait for it ...

boats.

In other news,

"Hawaii could make aviation history by becoming the first place in North America with scheduled electric passenger flights, launching a new era of interisland travel."



"Cause in Hawaii nothing says "Safe" more than a flying Tesla.
19
I was hoping for the remote chance the 9th would've re-evaluated the bans on park/beach carry and alcohol based on the SCOTUS opinion.  Wolford narrowed the scope of the time period, allegories, and relevance of historical laws needed to uphold weapons bans a bit more.  9th should've kept the injunction on those places in place, but the 9th is going to do what they do best.

The bans will be in place for a while.  I'm hoping Clarence Thomas writes the AWB opinion and goes nuclear in a final blaze of glory.  The AWB has always been his passion project and he's been itching to get to it all these years.  I expect Thomas to retire if Republicans hold the Senate in the mid-terms and replaced by Vandyke.  So Chief Justice Roberts might give Thomas the leeway to write a more powerful 2A opinion.

I hope that opinion locks down the 2A historical time period to the 1800's which would obliterate the defense of gun control laws.  That would get rid of a lot of the sensitive places bans
Many thanks zippz for adding your insights regarding the legal chess here - it is greatly appreciated!

Separately, can you or others provide some color on what they are likely to do with SB3041 - the forced "No Guns" placard monstrosity?

https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=3041

They referred it to a bunch of committees 1/30/26 and it died there - but I was assuming that they were waiting for Wolford to resolve before proceeding to shove it down the people's throats.

Is there any business resistance to this forced speech, etc., that maybe dampens its likelihood?

Just asking because I've not seen any mention of it - and it seemed like this was their big line of attack.

Thanks in advance for anything shared!
20
A new opinion has been issued by the 9th Cir Court of Appeals in Wolford, based on the SCOTUS ruling.  You can continue carry with a CCW license on private property open to the public without a guns allowed sign/explicit permission.  However the preliminary injunction has been dissolved,  therefore you cannot carry in parks/beaches and places that serve alcohol from now on. The lawsuit now goes back to the district court.  It is likely these restrictions stay in place for Hawaii until SCOTUS reviews sensitive places again or another SCOTUS ruling has some sort of unexpected far reaching effect on this.

It's going to be a while.

https://www.scribd.com/document/1072031585/Wolford-Ninth-Circuit-Opinion-Post-Remand
Many thanks for posting this zippz.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 59