This is not the first time I've posted this, but someone keeps pretending they know things that just aren't true.

"Fake News" does not mean "False Information."  We already have a word for that:  misinformation, or propaganda.

"Fake News" is a term that describes what main stream media outlets push as "news", when it is in fact them spinning a narrative so it's not actually false.  It is intended to get people to read it -- or at least click the link -- so the site makes more money.

Fake News is often substituted for real news when the real news goes against the Democrat media's interests.  Like the Hunter Biden laptop. They pretty much buried the story just before the election in order to help Biden win.  Even the FBI sat on the laptop evidence for months before anyone knew about it.  Nothing would have been reported had the repair shop owner not sent a copy of the hard drive to Rudy G.  The whole time, the MSM put out dismissals and denials that the laptop was even Hunter's, that it held evidence that his father was involved in Hunter's "business" dealings, etc.

That was all fake news designed to distract and deflect from the real news.

Stop using the term to imply false statements or misinformation. 

Not really, its been used in contact of facts.  Trump himself has used it not in referring to the media.

FDA authorizes pfizermectin for high risk. To be used at home. Basically like ivermectins treatment regiment.

WH already bought billions of $ worth.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

This is highly misleading information.  Unless your analogy is that its also a pill...

Pfizers pills is NOT the same as ivermectin

https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-067310377629

I like Savage firearms. Will try this one. After the Ruger PR came out they followed with their own chassis rifle with MDT. I'll be looking out for any reviews done by real shooters out on a range. Shooters who have solid skills, know range rules and not afraid to head out to a range

Gotta #trusttheexperts

You can search reviews of the honor guard.

Someone said the vaccinated are going to die in 3 years (or whatever).

You disagree.

You can't say it is fake.

Someone else posts information that some of the vaccinated ARE dying.

This SUPPORTS the first hypothesis that vaccinated CAN die (but doesn't PROVE that ALL of them will die in 3 years).

So far, there is no evidence that says the vaccinated WILL NOT die in 3 years. Unless someone has a time machine.

Personally I do NOT think that the vaccinated will all die in 3 years. I think this was a myth put out there to discredit the people who do not want the vaccine, and then in 3 years (another 2 years or so) people can say SEE! No deaths in 3 years. Let's force the unvaccinated to get injected now!

However I do think there is SOMETHING SERIOUSLY WRONG with the mRNA gene experimentation injections and I think that the death and illness rate will INCREASE due to these injections.

For support of this theory, I will post a video (in another thread, so it doesn't get buried here) of many doctors and scientific/medical EXPERTS who say the same thing.

A disproven theory that is said again can be considered fake.  The original term coined by Trump was used MUCH more loosely.  And most people on this forum loved those “times”. 
For example, we have a very large degree of certainty the world is not flat.  Calling something that mentions the world being flat “fakenews” is perfectly reasonable.
I have including evidence that vaccinated people are not “dying” from the vaccine.  Billions are vaccinated, billions are not dead.  If there is no evidence of something happening you can’t predict the future. 
As for the conspiracy, can’t really comment on the source but I doubt it.  Some people actually believe it.
And for mRNA is see nothing wrong.  Looks like a medical breakthrough that shortly could cure cancer.  I gladly took 3 shots.  I believe the experts and have had no side effects.  I think death and illness will decrease and the technology will one day save billions of lives.
https://www.modernatx.com/pipeline/therapeutic-areas/mrna-personalized-cancer-vaccines-and-immuno-oncology
While you may have some doctors and scientists, the majority still believe it is safe.  And there is no evidence that is contrary enough to sway that.
Just like you can find someone with a PHD who may tell you the earth is flat and many more who would say its not.

It probably modifies your gender hormones too

https://trickyprofit.com/2021/12/18/china-is-laughing-as-us-military-begins-purging-the-unvaxxed-us-air-force-is-polling-its-remaining-members-on-diversity-equity-and-inclusion-logos/

I researched your claim that it may modify your "gender" hormones.  I found no results do you have proof of these claims?  And comment on the fact that "gender" is more a social construct so it would be quite hard to change it via a vaccine?

Unfortunate.  Hopefully they reverse this decision. 

If you say something in "public"  then others in public have every right to comment.  If you don't want that don't say it.

Biden has a hard time finding his way to the White House but some here admire his leadership...off a cliff

Not me, he isn't great but there can be worse.  When the bar is set so low its not hard to top it.  He isn't that smart but smarter than some other presidents we had.  I hope the next president is smarter than both.

"PERCENT OF LOST JOBS RECOVERED"
please show me what that has to do with population...

Its almost like smaller states have different economies.... Different sectors....some that might recover faster than others....

Are you referring to the vaccine mandates, and how workers in the US "desperate to live" must choose between economic stability and receiving an experimental drug that is still not fully tested?

And how "civil liberties" is just a tagline for people who bow down to government control when ordered to take that vaccine even though the adverse effects are still uncertain?

Am I close?

I think you mean how certain countries put pad locks on doors and trapped people.   Experts mysteriously disappeared and no safety net.   That's the civil liberties you are looking for.   

Unless you are referring to the liberties of choice but many in this country like to pick and choose on that issue.