... Others presented more evidence and irregularities they felt were indicative of intentional arson or controlled demolition.
There's nothing controlled in 60-80 MPH winds.
Also, it's more likely there was incompetence on the part of the fire department. Green admitted the fire department responded to a brush fire before the destruction began. The firemen "thought" they had extinguished it and left. Apparently they didn't consider the high winds which obviously reignited the brush fire because there were hot spots which flared up again.
Fire professionals should have enough training on the physics of fire to know that abnormally high winds will interact with heat in ways that might warrant a little extra effort and monitoring to ensure it's 100% put out.
After the fire reignited, the winds caused "a mile a minute" travel, spreading it beyond containment very quickly.
Of course, there still needs to be an investigation into the origin of the fire before it was fought the first time, but it would seem there was at least one moment in time where the government (fire department) had the opportunity to stop the disaster from at least one originating point.
There were also questions as to why there were no cellular alerts to evacuate, that there was fire danger, and why the elaborate siren warning system never sounded. Green said they are looking into those things -- not to assign blame, but to find out how they can fix these systems going forward. "Going forward" is Democrat speak for "I know we failed, but rather than suffer the consequences, we want the public to
trust us to fix the problems we caused or neglected -- the same people whose failures caused people to die."