Looking for a little clarification or at least the law that states that a in case of a TRO the judge can order the surrender of firearms.

Situation
TRO issued on someone in a house but neither the defendant or a named respondent in the TRO have any firearms registered to them. 

Can the judge issue a order to surrender to someone not named on the TRO?

What about a multi-family dwelling?

I was looking for that post but it wasn't coming up with my search terms.

However the situation is a little different. The owner of the firearms is not listed anywhere in the TRO.

Father was named as a respondent. 

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Looking for a little clarification or at least the law that states that a in case of a TRO the judge can order the surrender of firearms.

Situation
TRO issued on someone in a house but neither the defendant or a named respondent in the TRO have any firearms registered to them. 

Can the judge issue a order to surrender to someone not named on the TRO?

What about a multi-family dwelling?

So, how would this play our in the case of a married couple with joint registration on firearms? If one of the married partners became subject to a TRO, would HPD confiscate the firearms the firearms or not?

So, how would this play our in the case of a married couple with joint registration on firearms? If one of the married partners became subject to a TRO, would HPD confiscate the firearms the firearms or not?

Looking for a little clarification or at least the law that states that a in case of a TRO the judge can order the surrender of firearms.

Situation
TRO issued on someone in a house but neither the defendant or a named respondent in the TRO have any firearms registered to them. 

Can the judge issue a order to surrender to someone not named on the TRO?

What about a multi-family dwelling?

No, If a person is not named on a TRO they can not be issued a surrender order.

You can transfer all of said guns to me.  I will take real good care of them!   

So how does that work. Does the HPD obtain a search warrant to find the firearms or do they immediately arrest the registered firearm owner for not complying with the HRS if the registered owner doesn't immediately hand them over whether they are included in the TRO or not?

A TRO has to be served on the people named in it, like a subpoena.  If they know guns are in the house, they could do the TRO and confiscation in one visit.

I'm just guessing, but I'd bet the TRO has a blanket clause that covers surrender or confiscation of any firearms the named individuals have access to.

Sure, but I assume that the officer will arrive with a list of all registered firearms at the address. How does it work if the owner flat out lies and says that they don't have the firearms anymore because they mailed them to another State. Does the officer get the cuffs out?

No person who has been restrained pursuant to an order of any court, including an ex parte order as provided in this subsection, from contacting, threatening, or physically abusing any person, shall possess, control, or transfer ownership of any firearm or ammunition therefor, so long as the protective order, restraining order, or any extension is in effect, unless the order, for good cause shown, specifically permits the possession of a firearm and ammunition.  The restraining order or order of protection shall specifically include a statement that possession, control, or transfer of ownership of a firearm or ammunition by the person named in the order is prohibited.  Such person shall relinquish possession and control of any firearm and ammunition owned by that person to the police department of the appropriate county for safekeeping for the duration of the order or extension thereof.  In the case of an ex parte order, the affidavit or statement under oath that forms the basis for the order shall contain a statement of the facts that support a finding that the person to be restrained owns, intends to obtain or to transfer ownership of, or possesses a firearm, and that the firearm may be used to threaten, injure, or abuse any person.  The ex parte order shall be effective upon service pursuant to section 586-6.  At the time of service of a restraining order involving firearms and ammunition issued by any court, the police officer may take custody of any and all firearms and ammunition in plain sight, those discovered pursuant to a consensual search, and those firearms surrendered by the person restrained.  If the person restrained is the registered owner of a firearm and knows the location of the firearm, but refuses to surrender the firearm or refuses to disclose the location of the firearm, the person restrained shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.  In any case, when a police officer is unable to locate the firearms and ammunition either registered under this chapter or known to the person granted protection by the court, the police officer shall apply to the court for a search warrant pursuant to chapter 803 for the limited purpose of seizing the firearm and ammunition.

     For the purposes of this subsection, good cause shall not be based solely upon the consideration that the person subject to restraint pursuant to an order of any court, including an ex parte order as provided for in this subsection, is required to possess or carry firearms or ammunition during the course of the person's employment.  Good cause consideration may include but not be limited to the protection and safety of the person to whom a restraining order is granted.