Yet, when someone ELSE posts a pro-police comment, and then posts a comment unsupportive of an officer's actions, you scream hypocrite.
Either that, or you assume supporting police in general somehow means supporting EVERYTHING, good or bad, individual Cops do.
First, there is no secret I am not a supporter of American military policy and have never supported any actions taken by them since the illegal overthrow of Queen Liliuokalani in 1893 to the present. In the example of Captain Crozier, as I commented to Ren, I supported the heroic actions of a commanding officer in the US Navy,
DEFYING his mission as part of its military policy in the region, in order to protect the men and women under his command. In this case, my support of the actions of Captain Crozier did not go against any of my core beliefs.
In contrast, you have gone on record defending HPD and its officers in any officer involved shooting incidents with little concern whether the rights of those individuals shot were violated. Most recently, you have also gone on record in defense of the right to own standard capacity magazines. From your actions, it seems to me you have an inconsistent standard when it comes to the rights of individuals. When actions of the police potentially violate the rights of others, you vigorously support the police; but if their actions cause a restriction of your rights, you go against them.
Nothing wrong with it, but I think it is you who is sometimes inconsistent, not me.