what about gut and replace aspect? tarnas admited as much on the news. took the text from one bill that already died and inserted into this one.
It's not to the same extent as what the HI supreme Court ruled on a few years ago.
This bill wasn't gutted or replaced, the original 50 cal ban still remains they just added more. And it still relates to firearms bans. What Tarnas did was substantially add to it which wasn't heard by the Senate committees and public wasn't allowed to testify in the Senate.
Hawaii Supreme Court would rule against us if lawsuit was filed. The gut and replace was overruled by a 5 to 4 vote. Lawsuit like this would cost about $100,000 or more.
Thinking back on a federal lawsuit, maybe we could get a tro or preliminary injunction if we get lucky on the judge. Since the Duncan ruling was more on the point of magazines aren't protected under the 2a. Would still be very difficult to get tho.