EEF should report it to himself?

Wow, that escalated quickly.  Please show me where I stated Trump molested you.  So you're also wrong again for using the "closed" word.

I'm also not going to assume that you never met him in person either.  Hence he could have shaken your hand too hard and hurt you. He could have tapped you on the shoulder too hard and hurt you as well.  Maybe he threw a ball and it hit your head and it hurt you.

You're not being too objective/logical.

Please show me where I said that you didn't bring up another mans balls.

So once again, you're wrong.

But if the event Trump did molest you since you're the one who brought that up, you should report it to the police.

EEF should report it to himself?

Nah, conflict of interest. He would call 911. Then ask his coworkers to get the ball going if it stalls.  Professional courtesy.  Like not getting a DUI or speeding ticket.

lul
the chinese were running it great and the US forced panama to submit?

lul
the chinese were running it great and the US forced panama to submit?

That's different:  Panama filed criminal charges against Chinese-linked canal port services owner for breach of contract.

In the US, breach of contract is normally filed in civil court.  The Chinese company must have royally screwed up big time.

Panama just dropped shocking charges against the Chinese-owned
company running its canal ports, alleging major contract violations and
unpaid fees. This explosive move could shake up global trade and
intensify tensions between China and the West.

Well, at least Panama avoided using words like imperial, empire, vassel and okole.  this would have been a much worse situation had the US Empire been doing this.

i cannot wait for the forum SME to come and mansplain this to us...

That's different:  Panama filed criminal charges against Chinese-linked canal port services owner for breach of contract.

In the US, breach of contract is normally filed in civil court.  The Chinese company must have royally screwed up big time.

Well, at least Panama avoided using words like imperial, empire, vassel and okole.  this would have been a much worse situation had the US Empire been doing this.

Wow, that escalated quickly.  Please show me where I stated Trump molested you.  So you're also wrong again for using the "closed" word.

I'm also not going to assume that you never met him in person either.  Hence he could have shaken your hand too hard and hurt you. He could have tapped you on the shoulder too hard and hurt you as well.  Maybe he threw a ball and it hit your head and it hurt you.

You're not being too objective/logical.

Please show me where I said that you didn't bring up another mans balls.

So once again, you're wrong.

But if the event Trump did molest you since you're the one who brought that up, you should report it to the police.

Do you have amnesia? You don't remember telling me to tell you where the orange man touched me?

Do you have amnesia? You don't remember telling me to tell you where the orange man touched me?

Do you have amnesia?  Did you not read my post about shaking his hand or a tap on the shoulder?  Did you ever answer with "no, he never touched me as we've never met in person".  Or maybe that's too much of a definite statement to make and you cannot figure out how to play both sides.

Do you have amnesia?  Did you not read my post about shaking his hand or a tap on the shoulder?  Did you ever answer with "no, he never touched me as we've never met in person".  Or maybe that's too much of a definite statement to make and you cannot figure out how to play both sides.

You are arguing just to argue. 

You are arguing just to argue. 

And here you are posting about nothing as usual, just to argue.  Thanks for playing and once again keeping a dead thread alive.

And here you are posting about nothing as usual, just to argue.  Thanks for playing and once again keeping a dead thread alive.

Threatening Panama is "nothing"?
Okay 

Threatening Panama is "nothing"?
Okay 

And here's the revival again. We covered this already about what you feel is  "threatening".  See what happens when you go by feelings and not facts/logic. You forget what we already covered. Read from the post 1 all over again.

And here's the revival again. We covered this already about what you feel is  "threatening".  See what happens when you go by feelings and not facts/logic. You forget what we already covered. Read from the post 1 all over again.

Your arguments were devoid or facts and logic back then and they are still today. Re-reading them isn't going to make them better.

You are free to not respond and let this thread die.

Your arguments were devoid or facts and logic back then and they are still today. Re-reading them isn't going to make them better.

You are free to not respond and let this thread die.

Only in your mind they are. Re-read them so you can understand. If you need help, have someone read it aloud to you and explain with pictures if you need that too.

Thanks for playing.

Only in your mind they are. Re-read them so you can understand. If you need help, have someone read it aloud to you and explain with pictures if you need that too.

Thanks for playing.

Re-reading gibberish doesn't make it Shakespeare.

Re-reading gibberish doesn't make it Shakespeare.

You keep trying to justify the fact that you cannot understand things.  A simple "CMO, i didn't get it at first and was wrong. I had someone help me and now I agree with you". Then the thread dies off.

You keep trying to justify the fact that you cannot understand things.  A simple "CMO, i didn't get it at first and was wrong. I had someone help me and now I agree with you". Then the thread dies off.

That would require me to lie, I don't like to lie.

Are you scared to backtrack your original statements, is that why you refuse to admit the implications of Trump's words? Or is it cognitive dissonance?

That would require me to lie, I don't like to lie.

Are you scared to backtrack your original statements, is that why you refuse to admit the implications of Trump's words? Or is it cognitive dissonance?

A lie right here.

Again, we covered this and you're choosing to not accept it because you don't want to admit you were wrong.

A lie right here.

Again, we covered this and you're choosing to not accept it because you don't want to admit you were wrong.

Ironic of you to call me the liar to cover your own dishonesty.

Ironic of you to call me the liar to cover your own dishonesty.

What does that have to do with Panama?

 

Ironic of you to call me the liar to cover your own dishonesty.

Nice try.  Since you got nothing else to show you're correct, you're now just copying what I'm talking about.  Thanks for playing.