where is the Gas station exception in the law ?
Common sense clause. Rather you stop there than the side of the road -- out of gas calling AAA.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
where is the Gas station exception in the law ?
What do you guys think of receiving a certificate of training just for logging purposes?
Maybe there can be a standard certificate that's printable by users that the senior RSO can sign off on?! (To alleviate costs)
Reason: I think it's beneficial to have a document of training (plus hours) just in case a legal dispute ever arises and you want to use "time in training" as a defense.
From the contour and tool marks, that looks like something that you made on your press.
If it contains no powder or primer then you should be fine.
You will probably be detained at an airport though.
Unless you devise a removable screw mount for a keychain.
No part of a firearm, bullets or powder can be carried on your person or in your carry-on bag. Technically, an empty case should not be a problem but I personally wouldn't do it.
[§134-27] Place to keep ammunition; penalty. (a) Except as provided in sections 134-5 and 134-9, all ammunition shall be confined to the possessor's place of business, residence, or sojourn; provided that it shall be lawful to carry ammunition in an enclosed container from the place of purchase to the purchaser's place of business, residence, or sojourn, or between these places upon change of place of business, residence, or sojourn, or between these places and the following:
(1) A place of repair;
(2) A target range;
(3) A licensed dealer's place of business;
(4) An organized, scheduled firearms show or exhibit;
(5) A place of formal hunter or firearm use training or instruction; or
(6) A police station.
"Enclosed container" means a rigidly constructed receptacle, or a commercially manufactured gun case, or the equivalent thereof that completely encloses the ammunition.
(b) Any person violating this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. [L 2006, c 66, pt of §1]
Discussed: 911 F. Supp. 2d 972 (2012).
I have a suggestion for you 2.
Flapp_Jackson please add Eyeeatingfish to your ignore list.
Eyeeatingfish please add Flapp_Jackson to your ignore list.
The two of you arguing back and forth is basically derailing almost every post on the forum, CAN YOU PLEASE for the sake of every one else, STOP
One of the defenses to a crime is believing that you were acting legally based on the advice of an appropriate official. Not guaranteeing you will get off but at least if we did seek advice and the advice ended up being wrong we do have some grounds for defense.
You are using one definition of the word advice while I am using a different definition of the word. You however are claiming yours is the only accurate one which is simply not true. I didn't think it would come to this but we can start with the dictionary since you need to define fairly basic English words.
1.an opinion or recommendation offered as a guide to action, conduct, etc.:
I shall act on your advice.
2. a communication, especially from a distance, containing information:
3. an official notification, especially one pertaining to a business agreement:
Obviously, given the context of my post, I was not using definition #1 but definition #2. Communicating information. You wanted to say interpret and I was cordial and agreed that interpret could also be an applicable word. Unfortunately you could not return the gesture and had to pretend your definition was the only in existence.
I even researched multiple law dictionaries for you and amazingly they didn't have definitions for the word "advice"
So if it wasn't obvious to you in the beginning what I was getting at in my statement then it sure as heck is now. My original point remains valid even if you want to nitpick the terms I used.
And your pattern repeats. You derail the thread and then blame it on me. Let me guess, next you are going to complain that I responded after you used the back to topic emoticon? You don't care about staying on topic because if you did you wouldn't have bothered to go down this path in the first place. You only use that emoticon for your flame war purposes. I reply to you because I refuse to be bullied by you.
Saying that speeding is illegal is advising someone of the law no matter how you want to twist it. My statement remains accurate, you have proven nothing by playing with semantics.
Paris (AFP) - French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve on Saturday called on young citizens to become reservists and help boost security forces in the wake of the country's latest terror attack.
France's "operational reservists" include French citizens with or without military experience as well as former soldiers.
"I want to call on all French patriots who wish to do so, to join this operational reserve," said Cazeneuve.
You don't care about mistakes, you just smell blood in the water. If you only cared about mistakes then you would politely show me where and how I was wrong but that's not what you did is it?
If you ask a cop if an action is illegal and the cop says no then he advised to on the law, hence advice. In this example the cop is not advising you on a specific case, but on the law itself. Yes this is also referred to as interpreting but in the end it is still advice, hence you at nitpicking semantics.
If a cop tells you speeding is against the law, the cop is advising you of the law. Calling it interpretation is fine but it is still advice.
Spoken like a true blue SUBJECT. LOL...... A citizen is NOT a subject. Js
Semantics. Advice, in the context of my post, is a legal interpretation.
Are you incapable of having a mature conversation? Couldn't you have replied without snide comment?
As a general matter, only a lawyer may give actual legal advice, whereas any non-lawyer may recite legal information. Furthermore, it is generally illegal for a non-lawyer or unlicensed attorney to offer legal advice or otherwise represent someone other than himself or herself in a court of law.
Unlike legal information, legal advice refers to the written or oral counsel about a legal matter that would affect the rights and responsibilities of the person receiving the advice. In addition, actual legal advice requires careful analysis of the law as it applies to a person's specific situation - as opposed to speculation based on generic facts.
How do you get to the 2ahawaii store? I didn't know that 2ahawaii had 1
"Top Secret shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to
cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe."
It is believed that 1.4 million Americans have top secret clearances.