women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service? (Read 10252 times)

eyeeatingfish

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #60 on: October 24, 2024, 02:50:27 PM »
Yes it is irrelevant to your point. You once again are making stuff up that doesn't apply to the convo at hand. Which is why I did what you did and explained other plausible variables that sound good, but cannot be factored in. Like the taller means bigger feet, which means more likely to trip on stuff due to feet being 4 inches bigger than a womans foot.

I know you didn't say she froze, you said with regard to a taller agent, they can freeze.  You shouldn't fixate on freezing and admit it had nothing to do with the convo and should have never been brought up as it's a waste of space, time, and typing.  But yes, lets keep it going to try to dig yourself deeper. Your turn.

My turn? This is a pointless conversation to continue. I made a comment about how you cannot always tell about how someone will perform under fire. You keep trying to beat around the bush with irrelevant comments while never actually proving what I said incorrect. No more turns needed, there is nothing else to extract fromt his.

changemyoil66

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #61 on: October 24, 2024, 03:16:39 PM »
My turn? This is a pointless conversation to continue. I made a comment about how you cannot always tell about how someone will perform under fire. You keep trying to beat around the bush with irrelevant comments while never actually proving what I said incorrect. No more turns needed, there is nothing else to extract fromt his.

Yet here you are commenting on a dead thread. I don't have time to re-read everything that went on, but lets just assume that you still refuse to admit you're wrong again.

You're turn.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #62 on: October 24, 2024, 03:29:16 PM »
Yet here you are commenting on a dead thread. I don't have time to re-read everything that went on, but lets just assume that you still refuse to admit you're wrong again.

You're turn.

He needs the last word, even if his last word is accusing you of wanting the last word. 

He can't help himself.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

changemyoil66

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #63 on: October 24, 2024, 03:34:25 PM »
He needs the last word, even if his last word is accusing you of wanting the last word. 

He can't help himself.

Yeah, commenting on dead threads is really a waste of time, unless it's super important.  Which none of these are. Maybe he's hoping we would forget what we were discussing and post wrong info and then he goes "gotcha, I never said that".

I'm not going to re-read just so he can figure stuff out on dead threads. I'll just reply to the recent post if it warrants an reply. 

Flapp_Jackson

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #64 on: October 24, 2024, 03:41:14 PM »
Yeah, commenting on dead threads is really a waste of time, unless it's super important.  Which none of these are. Maybe he's hoping we would forget what we were discussing and post wrong info and then he goes "gotcha, I never said that".

I'm not going to re-read just so he can figure stuff out on dead threads. I'll just reply to the recent post if it warrants an reply.

His comments are a waste of time whether or not it's an old or dead thread.

He's trying to make himself relevant by dredging up weeks or months old comments.  The threads are no longer relevant, because all he's posting are insults and argumentative BS. 

You'd think after being away for so long. he'd have collected at least one new fact to use.  But. alas, nothing new to add.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Q

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #65 on: October 24, 2024, 06:56:25 PM »
... you cannot always tell about how someone will perform under fire.

Anyone can tell within minutes, if not seconds, how someone will react under fire in a training scenario.

eyeeatingfish

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #66 on: October 30, 2024, 05:17:25 PM »
Yet here you are commenting on a dead thread. I don't have time to re-read everything that went on, but lets just assume that you still refuse to admit you're wrong again.

You're turn.

Sorry I don't spend my every waking minute on this forum waiting to defeat another one of your empty rebuttals

changemyoil66

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #67 on: October 30, 2024, 06:12:07 PM »
Sorry I don't spend my every waking minute on this forum waiting to defeat another one of your empty rebuttals

They're never empty and you still haven't admitted my other one. Thanks for playing.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #68 on: October 30, 2024, 08:58:44 PM »
Sorry I don't spend my every waking minute on this forum waiting to defeat another one of your empty rebuttals

No, but you do enjoy digging up old threads to interject a few replies in a topic that nobody else is discussing.

Last word syndrome is real.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

eyeeatingfish

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #69 on: October 31, 2024, 06:17:21 PM »
They're never empty and you still haven't admitted my other one. Thanks for playing.

I guess being full of hot air is technically not empty. You got me there.

eyeeatingfish

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #70 on: October 31, 2024, 06:17:42 PM »
No, but you do enjoy digging up old threads to interject a few replies in a topic that nobody else is discussing.

Last word syndrome is real.

And yet you reply....

Flapp_Jackson

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #71 on: October 31, 2024, 08:22:57 PM »
And yet you reply....

Thanks for proving us right about you.

 :closed:

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

changemyoil66

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #72 on: November 01, 2024, 10:02:35 AM »
I guess being full of hot air is technically not empty. You got me there.

Still not admitting it huh. I can wait.

eyeeatingfish

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #73 on: November 05, 2024, 12:04:28 AM »
Thanks for proving us right about you.

 :closed:

I guess we suffer the same affliction.

changemyoil66

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #74 on: November 05, 2024, 08:34:46 AM »
I guess we suffer the same affliction.

And here you are adding nothing. But instead trying to get the last word again instead of letting a thread die and everyone seeing you're refusing to admit you're wrong.

eyeeatingfish

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #75 on: November 10, 2024, 12:39:24 AM »
And here you are adding nothing. But instead trying to get the last word again instead of letting a thread die and everyone seeing you're refusing to admit you're wrong.

Then stop replying

changemyoil66

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #76 on: November 10, 2024, 02:02:22 PM »
Then stop replying
And hes back so he can refuse to admit it. Thanks for playing.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

eyeeatingfish

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #77 on: November 17, 2024, 12:51:31 AM »
And hes back so he can refuse to admit it. Thanks for playing.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

That's why you came back?

changemyoil66

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #78 on: November 17, 2024, 10:26:06 AM »
That's why you came back?
This is why u come back. And here u are reviving a dead thread.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

eyeeatingfish

Re: women SHOULDN'T be in Secret Service?
« Reply #79 on: November 19, 2024, 01:32:05 AM »
This is why u come back. And here u are reviving a dead thread.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

So why do you keep coming back? It's not like I was even continuing the debate.  O0