Let me rephrase, I am not aware of any such cases. Are you aware of any cases where someone who was denied a CCW got killed or seriously injured?

How do you come to the conclusion that police are immune? They sure aren't immune from other lawsuits.

Let me rephrase, I am not aware of any such cases.

I see, you can claim to state a fact, used as a premise in an argument, but once you are called on it and asked to provide evidence for claimed fact then you backtrack and tell us that that was only your made up opinion based on nothing at all except your "awareness". We all know from reading many of your posts that you are not aware of a lot of things, so please in the future do not claim as facts shit that you just make up.

Are you aware of any cases where someone who was denied a CCW got killed or seriously injured?

1. How would anyone know if someone who got "killed or seriously injured" was denied a CCW? The case of Carol Bowne, referred to above, was only known publicly because her family was outraged and went public. Oh, and what were the consequences for the cops that denied her her permit? That's right: zero.
2. Why should the criteria be "killed or seriously injured"? How about "victim of a crime which may have been prevented or minimized had the victim be armed"? Please justify your criteria of "killed or seriously injured". Go ahead, "rephrase it".
3.You are a minor step away from the actual policy of the Hawaii police chiefs wherein a person has to PROVE a high probability of likely crime victimization that could ONLY be prevented by carrying a firearm outside their home (yeah, that's right, people have been told to "move" rather than be given a CCW license as a solution to a documented threat [admitted anecdote: the cops did not admit to this claim of a denied licensee when asked, so it is only her word... the cops didn't put that in writing, it was an oral communication]).
4. There is no point in making the criteria for "a wrong" in Hawaii "denied a CCW" because everyone knows there is no point in applying because no one ever is granted one (unless you "just happen" to be a judge), so it's just a waste of time and money. The criteria should at least be "victim of a crime who would have carried a weapon had it been possible to carry one legally".

The thin line is the line between making the right call and making the wrong call, denying someone's civil rights or not.

Uh huh. And you're claiming that every single person in Hawaii who has applied for a CCW license, and been denied the right to "bear arms" has been the "right call" by the cops and no one has been denied their "civil rights"? Denying someone their civil rights is ALWAYS the "wrong call". Yet, that is what they do. And they do it with impunity.

You wanna make the constitutional argument? Go ahead, I support that but as far as HPD is concerned, they are following state law and case precedent so your unconstitutional argument doesn't convince anyone but us.

No, they are not "following state law". They are interpreting state law a particular way, arbitrarily and capriciously, at their whim and pleasure. Thus they can interpret state law one way and issue a judge a CCW license because, well, "judge", and not issue a CCW license to anyone else because, well, "fuck you, you serf, who the fuck do you think you are". And yes, the fact that there are a majority of Hawaii judges and Ninth Circuit judges who happen to be fascist civilian-disarmament advocates who mendaciously produce "precedents" which justify "regulations" that are de facto "bans" is a difficult to overcome problem.

What job is it? It is their job as issuer of permits.

I believe a more accurate term is "NONissuer of permits", or even more accurately "elite fascist bullies enforcing "laws" in whatever way we arbitrarily choose".

You dont have the right to carry outside your home  : Peruta v. County of San Diego

I hate to say this to y'all but I cannot wait to move back to GA in 16 months.

Who wouldn't want to move from Hawaii to the United States of America?

Who wouldn't want to move from Hawaii to the United States of America?

When you can get 34 acres for 120k and the state government leaves you alone it's a no brainer.

You dont have the right to carry outside your home  : Peruta v. County of San Diego

Just out of curiosity, what sort of real estate can be purchased on Oahu for $120k? [Where's the coffee spitting emoticon?] Dave? Does any of that Oahu real estate come with a "government-mostly-leaves-you-alone" provision?

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Was this question for me? You quoted z06psi so I am a little confused.

Well, it was to anyone really, but since you self-identify as a real estate agent I thought you might have accurate information immediately available.

So, what can a person get on Oahu for $120k? I mean real estate-wise...