in...
https://www.khon2.com/news/national/assailant-kills-several-people-with-bow-and-arrows-in-norway/

Was the archer's name Kevin, maybe?

We Need to Talk About Kevin
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1242460/

https://www.amazon.com/gp/video/detail/B0083GQKQG/ref=atv_dp_share_cu_r

Anti gunners will say, if he had an assault rifle, it would have been worst.

reminds me of this video
this is not the Lars Anderson from Wrestling Hawaii   

Anti gunners will say, if he had an assault rifle, it would have been worst.

And of he had a nuke it be even worse.  The tool isn't the issue its the loony who uses it.   

And of he had a nuke it be even worse.  The tool isn't the issue its the loony who uses it.

Reminds me of that tank in LA. Sure he had no ammo for the big gun, doubt he had a m60 or whatever at the top hatch. But no one could stop it. They just followed until he ran out of gas or gave up. Kinda forgot the ending. Imagine any crazy fuck decided to drive a tank at alas or downtown. Pretty much nothing can stop it. Unless Hawaii's NG accomodates by sending in some tanks to stop that 1 tank lol. Now wouldnt that be a show.

I own no bows or arrows!

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

I own no bows or arrows!

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

I've hunted with Bow, muzzle loader, and modern fire arms.
I fail to see why some people think a bow is so much more humane
and "noble"
It certainly is more challenging, but it is deadly.
Ever wondered why in most places it is illegal to hunt with a crossbow?
It is as deadly as a modern rifle, and quiet.
Think about what a well hidden guy with a cross bow sniping a crowd could do?

Lucky for society, I'm very ethical and law obedient.

 

I've hunted with Bow, muzzle loader, and modern fire arms.
I fail to see why some people think a bow is so much more humane
and "noble"
It certainly is more challenging, but it is deadly.
Ever wondered why in most places it is illegal to hunt with a crossbow?
It is as deadly as a modern rifle, and quiet.
Think about what a well hidden guy with a cross bow sniping a crowd could do?

Lucky for society, I'm very ethical and law obedient.

 

I wouldn’t use the word “obedient” as that shows one that you might not think for yourself. I would say compliant. Sounds better and shows others that you recognize you have freedom and a choice.

Anti gunners will say, if he had an assault rifle, it would have been worst.

french rental truck had 84 dead, 400+ injured.  Bastille Day 2016.

I wouldn’t use the word “obedient” as that shows one that you might not think for yourself. I would say compliant. Sounds better and shows others that you recognize you have freedom and a choice.

My sarcasm is very subtle.
 

My sarcasm is very subtle.
 

Crude at times but subtle!

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

My sarcasm is very subtle.
 

I do not own a bow, arrows, crossbow, or archery equipment.

I've hunted with Bow, muzzle loader, and modern fire arms.
I fail to see why some people think a bow is so much more humane
and "noble"
It certainly is more challenging, but it is deadly.
Ever wondered why in most places it is illegal to hunt with a crossbow?
It is as deadly as a modern rifle, and quiet.
Think about what a well hidden guy with a cross bow sniping a crowd could do?

Lucky for society, I'm very ethical and law obedient.

 

My friend came from a family of hunters.  He would was like you, hunted with every known weapon to include a "freakin pencil".  (I had to add that in.  I just watch JW again).   Anyway he told me he didn't like hunting with a bow because it was not a quick kill.  The arrow tips used were called "bleeders" because the arrow tip would cause the animal to bleed to death and he would have to track game down.

My idea of hunting is going to costco and elbowing my way to the last tri tip.

Anti gunners will say, if he had an assault rifle, it would have been worst.

Do you think they would be wrong though?

An argument is either true or it isn't true, it doesn't matter who makes it. I have both shooting experience and archery experience and personally, if my goal were to kill as many as possible, I would take an AR-15 over a bow and arrow. Wouldn't you?

Time for a "I lost all my bows and arrows in a boating accident" t-shirt!

Do you think they would be wrong though?

An argument is either true or it isn't true, it doesn't matter who makes it. I have both shooting experience and archery experience and personally, if my goal were to kill as many as possible, I would take an AR-15 over a bow and arrow. Wouldn't you?

Would u take an ar15 or a bow into a place that had others carrying an AR15 too?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Would u take an ar15 or a bow into a place that had others carrying an AR15 too?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

An AR-15 of course but that doesn't really have anything to do with my point.

An AR-15 of course but that doesn't really have anything to do with my point.

I think your point is missed because regardless of what you use a tool is nothing but a tool.  A plane,  truck, explosives and countless other tools would kill more than an ar15. 

There is only one root problem.   The person. 

My friend came from a family of hunters.  He would was like you, hunted with every known weapon to include a "freakin pencil".  (I had to add that in.  I just watch JW again).   Anyway he told me he didn't like hunting with a bow because it was not a quick kill.  The arrow tips used were called "bleeders" because the arrow tip would cause the animal to bleed to death and he would have to track game down.

My idea of hunting is going to costco and elbowing my way to the last tri tip.

Old saying, it's about shot placement. There is more to it than that but that's an important one.

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk