Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - 2ahavvaii

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 33
2
General Discussion / Re: Karl Rhoads want SCOTUS to cancel 2A
« on: July 08, 2022, 09:39:31 PM »
There have been numerous businesses sued after the company policy was updated to forbid firearms in employee cars in the company parking lots.

According to the courts, that's unconstitutional, as the policy denies the employees their 2A rights before, during and after their commute to work.  Anyone stopping for gas or groceries on the way to/from work would be disarmed involuntarily.

So, there's precedence that should cover whether or not you can be forced to leave a forearm at home versus in the car.

I'm okay with minimal times I'd have to store a gun in the car.  But then I recall the story of the Luby's cafeteria massacre, and how one woman lost her parents that day while her pistol was sitting in the car because of a new law.

Chuck Schumer was one of the smug politicians listening to her testimony as she described how she was rendered helpless when a madman entered her life.

As I keep reiterating: carrying a gun is for those threats you can't predict or even imagine.  Being turned into helpless sitting ducks needs to stop.

I'm semi drunk here, so bear with me.  The problem with these antigun nuts is they're too stupid to keep their requirements "reasonable" to the average law abiding citizen and the courts.  they will poke and prod the bear (supreme court) until they're forced into action and slap down their totally unconstitutional regulations.  If they kept it "reasonable", it would be a more difficult decision on SCOTUS to stand firm on the constitution.  Hawaii having 0 carry permits active is obviously a defacto ban.  If these dumbasses try to ban carry in PUBLIC spaces, they will get dongslapped again by SCOTUS.  Again, by keeping it "reasonable" to the average citizen, meaning no guns in prisons, state capitol, police stations, stadiums, the public and court would find it acceptable.  But they decide to go ultra extremist, which attracts the attention of the courts and the people.

As of December 2017 there were 0 active Handgun Carry Licenses issued to private citizens in Hawaii, out of a population of 1.4 million.

There is no such thing as a "liberal" or "conservative" justice, there's only judges that uphold the law or not.  The job of a justice is not to make up your own laws, but to interpret the laws as they are written, with possibly some legal leeway.  That's the reason for the 3 branches of government.  It is the duty of congress, elected by the people, to write the laws.  A 5th grader (hopefully) could tell you that.  The ONLY reason it isn't that simple is because this country is full of judges that tramples over the bounds of their legal powers.  Those judges should be fired and jailed.  Roe V Wade - even Ginsberg said that was a wrong legal decision.  Going WAY too far without the appropriate federal LEGISLATIVE action.

3
Open carry the biggest most obnoxious gun possible. Taurus Raging Judge anyone?

I have a 454 casull i bought for shits and giggles. Think the thing weighs at least 3.5 lbs loaded.  Your pants would be sagging down like a wannabe gangster unless you have a really stout belt.    :D
4
Mentioned this in another thread, but:

"You'll have an army of law abiding citizens lining up for millions in cash for violating their civil rights."

Quick example:  Woman applies for a CCW license, application in good order. She gets denied.  Subsequently she gets assaulted, raped, traumatized, whatever.  Sues.  Multimillion dollar settlement.  Rinse, repeat.
5
General Discussion / Re: Young V Hawaii
« on: July 03, 2022, 02:37:37 AM »
My plan is this;
Historically it takes my HPD critter two months to reject my CCW request.
So.
I'll file and give my complaint to the police commisssion.
They will take a month or two to say their cop is within his duties.
I will then contact the US attorney for a 18 US code 242 violation and file a lawsuit for several millions dollars
of compensation for violation of my civil rights.
using the SCOTUS review as a basis.
I have a criminal defense lawyer on speed dial.
I guess I'll have to find a good civil rights lawyer also.
 :popcorn:

That is the appropriate response to numbskulls that think ignoring the supreme court decision entirely is an option.  You'll have an army of law abiding citizens lining up for millions in cash for violating their civil rights.
6
General Discussion / Re: Karl Rhoads want SCOTUS to cancel 2A
« on: July 03, 2022, 02:34:07 AM »
My biggest shame is that this hack represents my district, and it's impossible to dislodge him.
7
General Discussion / Re: Reciprocity
« on: July 03, 2022, 02:31:34 AM »
I paid for my marriage license in Nevada, Hawaii and all states recognizes it as valid.
I passed and was awarded my motorcycle license in WA state- Hawaii recognizes it as do all states.
I was tested and earned my first drivers license in CA- all states recognize it.
I now have one of those Yellow star Hawaii drivers License, meaning "they" know who I am,
with a paper trail a mile long,  recognized and valid everywhere.
But a CCW License isn't recognized and valid in  all states.
Why is that?
 :wtf:

I think this point kinda goes along with my thinking, although I fully understand and recognize zippz point.  As Justice Thomas said:

Thomas complained that “[t]he right to keep and bear arms is apparently this Court’s constitutional orphan.”
8
General Discussion / Reciprocity
« on: July 01, 2022, 10:33:33 PM »
not to ask a stupid question, but where do we stand with reciprocity and the supreme court ruling?  Obtain CCW in Nevada for example.  carry in hawaii and get arrested because license not valid in hawaii.  Another supreme court case?  or slam dunk with 9th circus?

9
General Discussion / Re: Shooting diamond head
« on: February 01, 2020, 01:46:18 PM »
Rumor, heard from someone that one of the initial witnesses described a shotgun. I have been watching the videos and reading articles about the tragic incident but cannot find the interview that was mentioned.

Guessing people in the vicinity don't hit the range.  Otherwise they could tell the difference between small caliber and big bore rifle, shotgun, handgun, at the least.  They did say that the officer went flying back, so maybe it was a shotgun.
10
General Discussion / Re: Shooting diamond head
« on: January 30, 2020, 08:03:29 PM »
I'm surprised the media isn't talking about this 24/7
If it was a mass shooting they would be screaming assault weapon and we would have a timeline of events. 
I also personally never realized how big the fire was and how quickly it got that large. 

From what I've heard,  the female officer was shot first,  and the guy,  went in to rescue her, leave no officer behind. 
Only heard it once though

residential fires will quickly get out of control if the fire department doesn't show up to fight it. In this case, because the situation was dangerous, they were not allowed to fight it and instead let the homes burn.
11
General Discussion / Re: Shooting diamond head
« on: January 30, 2020, 05:44:34 AM »
In the news conference I saw, the police chief said the officers were hit above the protective area of their vests.  She wasn't any more specific as to the wound locations.

The first officer fatally wounded was one of two officers ambushed walking down the drive.  The second was when the killer was shooting into a group of officers that responded as backup.  Sounds like both kills were lucky shots while just firing at the groups.

If he were as skilled as some have commented, I think there would have been more fatalities.

JMHO.

Thanks, that's what I read as well, so was wondering what they considered above the protective area.  The first officer being ambushed was perhaps less avoidable, but the backup being killed perhaps could have been prevented with better procedure since there was already 1 officer down and a known armed perp. hindsight 20/20 of course though.
12
General Discussion / Re: Shooting diamond head
« on: January 28, 2020, 06:44:56 PM »
Where did the officers get shot?  Neck or head?  it was supposed to be above protection of the ballistic vest.
13
General Discussion / Let no tragedy go to waste - ban on lending firearms
« on: January 22, 2020, 04:17:35 AM »
Quote

State lawmakers said Tuesday that they were considering changes to Hawaii gun laws this session even before Sunday’s shooting deaths of two Honolulu police officers at a Diamond Head home presumably at the hands of a man who had no permit to own any guns.

Among the measures being considered in both the House and Senate are ones aimed at what lawmakers in both houses consider a loophole in gun regulations that involves the lending of firearms to another person.

“One of the loopholes that we’re finding is you may not necessarily be able to own one (a gun), but you can borrow one legally without having permitting in some cases,” said Rep. Chris Lee, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. “So that’s one of the bills this year that we’re looking at to try and sort out who is responsible and what checks are in place in situations like that.”

House Bill 1600 says the current law allows certain firearms to be lent to adults for use within the state for up to 15 days without a permit and for use outside the state for up to 75 days, “thereby allowing the lending of firearms to persons who are not subject to a background check and other firearm permit requirements.”

Senate Judiciary Chairman Karl Rhoads said he is introducing a similar measure in the Senate but that his version would include an exception allowing a hunter to lend firearms to another person with a firearm license for up to 12 hours.

https://www.staradvertiser.com/2020/01/22/hawaii-news/lawmakers-consider-ban-on-lending-of-guns/?HSA=bca32ba97c2d9dac11d10da3e8c64aed1363a128


Our friend chodes hard at work  ::)   

SO if you want to legally let your friend shoot your rifle at the range or where ever, you need to go to HPD and get a temporary permit?
14
they could draft so many other laws based on "Red Flags"
Think your neighbor has illegal fireworks? Just tell the cops and they get a warrant to raid the house.
A person about to drive drunk? Tell the court and they confiscate all their vehicles.

I saw my neighbor yelling at her kid and felt he was at danger.  The courts should have a hearing and take him away from her without due process

my other neighbor drinks a 12 pack beer in his garage every day, i think he's a risk.  lets take away his car, motorcycle, and his bicycle

I walked past a guy on the street that looked at me kinda funny, cops should strip him down and take anything that could be used as a weapon
15
Hawaii red flag law just signed by ige.

“It’s completely unconstitutional,” Gerwig said. “It completely violates the constitutional rights for due process — they’re just gone — because they can come and confiscate your property without any due process, zero due process.”

The new law allows the court to hold a hearing — without the gun owner present — where the judge can decide to temporarily confiscate the gun owner’s weapons, Gerwig said. The gun owner can then demand a hearing to determine whether the firearm seizure was warranted.

“In the meantime they have confiscated your property, stripped you of your rights, with no due process whatsoever,” he said.
16
General Discussion / Re: Parkland School Deputy Arrested
« on: June 27, 2019, 11:46:29 AM »
shouldnt matter.  no duty to protect.  only exception to that is if he had a specific charge as someone's guardian.  Such as if his job was to babysit X student for 1 hour per day, and he fell asleep on the job, and the child got injured.   Then he'd face civil lawsuit.
17
General Discussion / Re: CA Background Check to Buy Ammo
« on: June 27, 2019, 09:46:09 AM »
Lots of us have jobs that require a security clearance, to be bonded or to maintain a higher standard of personal integrity -- such as teacher or medical care staff.

The risk of losing one's livelihood is real should one be caught ignoring firearm laws and charged with a felony.

Your diatribe against people following the law is getting old.   :wacko:

agreed.  and some of us have positions with relatively high or high profiles, and have a lot to lose, not to mention making the news.
18
General Discussion / Re: Parkland School Deputy Arrested
« on: June 27, 2019, 09:43:29 AM »
if his employment is at will, he can be fired for any reason outside of discrimination. that includes not rushing into a hail of bullets.

however, he is not guilty of any criminal charges.
19
General Discussion / Re: CA Background Check to Buy Ammo
« on: June 26, 2019, 02:21:03 PM »
illegals can vote, drive, etc..... but it will require a background check to exercise a Constitutionally guaranteed right.  insane

20
General Discussion / Re: HNL on Lockdown
« on: June 22, 2019, 10:25:01 PM »
the real sad thing is these lib anti gunners couldnt distinguish a pole falling on the ground from a gun firing.  TSA agents taking off running, etc etc.  Yes depend on the government to protect you. lol
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 33