“That's why I'm subscribed to Parler and Rumble. Watching newsmax and oan besides talk radio.”
Wow you guys are unreal. Yes if you burrow deeply enough into extraordinarily biased web sites likenthose you listed in the quote, you can can reinforce your evho chambers of disinformation and laughable conspiracy theories.
Obviously anybody can say anything on a website or Twitter. When it gets to court there has to be some facts or evidence or these wild claims get tossed.
Yes this is like administering medicine to the dead. And you ill continue to insult me and others that do not have the same blinders on. How about some Aloha and an attempt at critical thinking?
Do you have a point, or just here to stir the pot?
Do you have evidence that refutes all the evidence posted here so far?
Did you even bother to read the articles and watch any of the videos, or are you simply dismissing it all out of hand as "extraordinarily biased?"
The Democrats have offered NO forensic, accounting or statistical evidence that disproves the claims made by the Republicans and many poll workers, fraud and computer experts, and voters. Just because a judge dismisses a case doesn't make the claims baseless. It just means the judge was not inclined to agree with the plaintiff. There was no attempt to offer opposing evidence -- you know, like logs from voting machines and counting machines, chain of custody sheets for ballots, inventory sheets for USB drives, etc, etc, etc.
It's one thing to blast people for asking questions, but quite another to offer fact-based and substantiated answers that make logical sense.