Election Fraud Evidence Thread (Read 269289 times)

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2280 on: June 24, 2021, 11:19:45 AM »
Where's the rage when republicans do the same shit?

Please post where an organization like the NDRC's equivalent's IRS's filing  says the groups mission is to "favorbaly position Republicans", without googling. Because the statement you made implies that you already know of said example.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2281 on: June 24, 2021, 12:22:50 PM »
Democrats hypocritically use words like "fair", "equal" and "impartial" all the time, but then their actions demonstrate all they really want is to game the system in their favor -- mostly because they know they can't win on the issues.

Republicans don't have to rig the game, because they can win on the issues without resorting to ballot harvesting, double-counting ballots, creating fake ballots to count in the middle of the night after sending observers home, kicking GOP observers out of the counting areas over made-up complaints, and raising money under the stated goal of redrawing districts to FAVOR Democrats.

Without proof that the Republicans "do the same thing," the focus isn't going to shift away from Holder and his lies.
"How can you diagnose someone with an obsessive-compulsive disorder
and then act as though I had some choice about barging in?"
-- Melvin Udall

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2282 on: June 24, 2021, 02:39:00 PM »
Please post where an organization like the NDRC's equivalent's IRS's filing  says the groups mission is to "favorbaly position Republicans", without googling. Because the statement you made implies that you already know of said example.

That's some head in the sand level shit.  Its as if you think gerrymandering is done just by democrats.

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2283 on: June 24, 2021, 02:40:26 PM »
Democrats hypocritically use words like "fair", "equal" and "impartial" all the time, but then their actions demonstrate all they really want is to game the system in their favor -- mostly because they know they can't win on the issues.

Republicans don't have to rig the game, because they can win on the issues without resorting to ballot harvesting, double-counting ballots, creating fake ballots to count in the middle of the night after sending observers home, kicking GOP observers out of the counting areas over made-up complaints, and raising money under the stated goal of redrawing districts to FAVOR Democrats.

Without proof that the Republicans "do the same thing," the focus isn't going to shift away from Holder and his lies.

lol see above post.

Head in sand alert.  Both parties are shitty gerrymanders'.  And use every opportunity to get ahead.  Its fucking politics.

ren

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2284 on: June 24, 2021, 02:53:17 PM »
lol see above post.

Head in sand alert.  Both parties are shitty gerrymanders'.  And use every opportunity to get ahead.  Its fucking politics.

been noticing an uptick of swearing...you OK?
Deeds Not Words

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2285 on: June 24, 2021, 02:54:09 PM »
been noticing an uptick of swearing...you OK?

Sorry about that. 

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2286 on: June 24, 2021, 02:58:56 PM »
been noticing an uptick of swearing...you OK?

Swearing indicates a lack of education.  People who swear often just can't think of anything more acceptable to say/type.

Ties into the whole "English is not in his wheelhouse" thing.   :geekdanc:
"How can you diagnose someone with an obsessive-compulsive disorder
and then act as though I had some choice about barging in?"
-- Melvin Udall

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2287 on: June 24, 2021, 03:01:06 PM »
That's some head in the sand level shit.  Its as if you think gerrymandering is done just by democrats.

YOU made the statement, I'm asking you to prove it.  By your response, I'm going to assume that you cannot prove it.  So my point has been noted.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2288 on: June 24, 2021, 03:06:32 PM »
YOU made the statement, I'm asking you to prove it.  By your response, I'm going to assume that you cannot prove it.  So my point has been noted.

He "knows things" without the need to post documented proof.

Some Republican somewhere MUST be lying about wanting fair district maps while heading up a group whose stated goal is to create an advantage to Republicans. 

The right-wing media and big tech must be suppressing those articles.
"How can you diagnose someone with an obsessive-compulsive disorder
and then act as though I had some choice about barging in?"
-- Melvin Udall

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2289 on: June 25, 2021, 07:42:37 AM »
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9725899/Biden-takes-Georgia-court-voting-rights.html

Biden takes Georgia to court over voting rights: AG Merrick Garland announces Justice Department to sue state for its 'restrictive' bill

'Our complaint alleges that recent changes to Georgia's election laws were enacted with the purpose of denying or abridging the right of black Georgians to vote on account of their race or color, in violation of Section two of the Voting Rights Act,' he said. 


So they are going to try and PROVE Racism? HAHAHAHHA good luck. I dont think they even read the bill.

oldfart

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2290 on: June 25, 2021, 08:02:34 AM »
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/ga-investigators-election-day-notes-reveal-chaotic-unsecured-ballot

Georgia investigator’s notes reveal ‘massive’ election integrity problems in Atlanta. Twenty-nine page memo cites double counting, insecure storage, ‘massive chain of custody problem’ and a worker’s threat to ‘f*ck sh*t up.’”
....
Wow
What, Me Worry?

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2291 on: June 25, 2021, 08:10:31 AM »
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/not-first-time-georgia-ballots-files-tampered-georgia-history-similar-events/

Not the First Time Georgia Ballots and Files Were Tampered With – Georgia has a History of Similar Events

In August 2016 cybersecurity researcher Logan Lamb discovered easy access to Georgia voting databases, passwords used by election staff, software that runs the devices, and all data on their 6.7 million voters. At that time Kennesaw State University was running Georgia’s elections. KSU asked Lamb to keep quiet and then nothing was done. Six months later in March 2017, Kennesaw State’s CIO Stephen Gay alerted their Center for Elections Systems of a “data breach”. Gay contacted the FBI, who made a forensic server image, then opened an investigation into the hacking.

Three months later Republican Karen Handel beat Jon Osoff by 3.8% in a runoff election for District 6. Upset by the loss, Democrat activists alleged the system might have been hacked. So on July 3rd 2017 (Curling v. Kemp) they filed in Fulton County Superior Court. They wanted Georgia to replace the outdated (DRE) election machines which had no paper record and massive security holes. Three days later KSU staff deleted the election servers. This data removal was kept from the plaintiffs until October 2017, when one plaintiff (Coalition for Good Governance) obtained KSU’s internal emails. KSU staff had purposely DBAN’d (nuked) the election servers on July 6th, and their backup servers on August 9th.

KSU Elections Systems answered to Brian Kemp, Georgia’s Secretary of State from 2010 to Nov. 2018. The State AG’s office defending Kemp originally told plaintiffs the data was deleted before their lawsuit. But this was proven false when the “Georgia wipes servers” story broke on October 26th, 2017 that included KSU emails. A few days later Assistant AG Cristina Correia withdrew the State AG’s office from the entire case due to “newly found” conflicts of interest. Kemp was running for Governor at this time, so he hired the law firm of former GA Governor Roy Barnes to defend this case.

In a December 2017 House hearing in Washington, Director Wray refused to answer if the FBI was investigating the Georgia election hacking, or if they had server data. A couple of years later, FOIA data from the FBI was provided to the Associated Press. It showed why FBI Wray was silent. FOIA shows there was NO indication the FBI ever examined the KSU server for tampering by malicious outsiders. The FBI investigation instead was aimed at the two researchers (Lamb & Christopher Gray) who alerted KSU about the election security risks. An FBI document dated Oct. 23, 2017, said the matter would be shelved once the drive image was placed in a case file. FOIA also showed the FBI did nothing for two months. They closed the case and NO ONE was ever charged.

In December 2016 Brian Kemp sent a letter to Secretary Jeh Johnson. Kemp asked why the DHS tried to penetrate Georgia’s election servers at least 10 times. DHS last attacks were Nov. 7th and 8th, the day before and day of the 2016 Trump election. Three years later in December of 2019, plaintiffs were finally able to obtain the election server copy made by the FBI in March 2017. Lamb’s affidavit says logs were deleted and other data altered. “Logs only go back to November 10th, 2016, two days after Donald Trump was elected.” Hackers accessed the system and conveniently deleted logs covering all DHS intrusion attempts.

When the FBI released this server copy in late 2019, Brad Raffensperger was the new Secretary of State. His office refused to submit this server for a thorough examination. Also, a protective order prevented Logan Lamb from speaking about his findings. Lambs testimony says he found “scores of files” that had been deleted on March 2, 2017, just days before KSU handed the server over to the FBI. Numerous other breaches were detected and millions of voter records were accessed. Lamb noted an attacker obtained full control of the server back to 2014 by exploiting a bug. The FBI did nothing. District Judge Amy Totenberg’s 2018 decision in this case was the green light Georgia needed to purchase Dominion equipment.

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2292 on: June 27, 2021, 08:06:17 AM »
Biden's DOJ run by a bitter failed SCOTUS candidate that couldnt get confirmed is off it's rocker. They are suing Georgia for passing new election law after all the shenanigans. Here is what they are calling 'evidence' the new laws are 'Racist'



















https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1408516445089239043

hvybarrels

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2293 on: June 27, 2021, 11:15:19 AM »
been noticing an uptick of swearing...you OK?

A sure sign of increasing desperation
“Wars happen when the government tells you who the enemy is. Revolutions happen when you figure it out for yourselves.”

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2294 on: June 27, 2021, 11:38:59 AM »
A sure sign of increasing desperation

In his opinion, he thinks it's appropriate to swear because others do. 

Plus, the First Amendment protects profanity as free speech.

How many times has he posted: It's a private website/business; they can do what they want?   :crazy:

Somehow he thinks the forum can't restrict language if it says it supports the First Amendment. 

That, while he also believes the Second Amendment is not absolute and can be restricted however the government wants. 

Contradictory to say the least.
"How can you diagnose someone with an obsessive-compulsive disorder
and then act as though I had some choice about barging in?"
-- Melvin Udall

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2295 on: June 27, 2021, 12:05:16 PM »
In his opinion, he thinks it's appropriate to swear because others do. 

Plus, the First Amendment protects profanity as free speech.

How many times has he posted: It's a private website/business; they can do what they want?   :crazy:

Somehow he thinks the forum can't restrict language if it says it supports the First Amendment. 

That, while he also believes the Second Amendment is not absolute and can be restricted however the government wants. 

Contradictory to say the least.
#doesntunderstandthebillofrights

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2296 on: June 27, 2021, 08:13:58 PM »
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/gop-lawmakers-strip-powers-controversial-secretary-state-katie-hobbs/

The Republican-controlled state Legislature in Arizona voted Thursday to revoke the Democratic secretary of state’s legal authority in election-related lawsuits, handing that power instead to the Republican attorney general…

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2297 on: June 28, 2021, 06:45:37 AM »

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2298 on: June 28, 2021, 08:03:04 AM »
Book no one has read yet, written by an MSM dummy without access to the WH says an anonymous source told him that Bill Barr said something about an issue that he never sent anyone to  investigate.  Nice to know they can still Russia Gate gaslight you, what do they say about 'Fool me Once ....'?

This 'there was no fraud' INFO comes out literally hours before AZ wrapped its audit. Enjoy screaming 'BUT BILL BARR SAID!' when the data is released.

Glasser

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #2299 on: June 28, 2021, 08:22:54 AM »
Bill Barr said there is no election fraud ... whoops.

https://trendingpolitics.com/ny-election-raises-red-flags-poll-watchers-find-more-ballots-than-voters-knab/

NY Election Raises Red Flags: Poll Watchers Find *MORE* Ballots Than Voters



election watchdog SMART elections has uncovered a reported anomaly in one City Council District in the 2021 Brooklyn Primary.

More ballots than voters.

“We are issuing this preliminary report because, in our opinion, we are experiencing hostility and obstruction from the New York City and the Brooklyn Board of Elections, as well as some coordinators at Early Voting poll sites,”

“We have discovered discrepancies that raise concerns and deserve further exploration,” the report continued. “These were reported to the coordinators at each poll site and directly to the Board of Elections. The Board of Elections responded by removing our project leader as a poll watcher and changing the information our poll watchers were allowed to view.'