Do you have a link that shows all nine justices concluded there is no right to concealed carry? I’ve looked and I can’t find any reference to that statement. The only reference I can find to anything regarding carrying firearms outside the home is Scalia saying that some “sensitive” places can ban the possession of firearms, like airports, schools, government buildings etc.
Considering that New York has been lobbying very hard for SCOTUS to not take this case, If what you say is true I would think New York would be chomping at the bit for SCOTUS to take this case and rule in their favor.
Sure, here's the link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf
You apparently forgot to read the sentence prior to the one you reference re the "sensitive places" prohibitions.
(My emphasis):IIILike most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited
. From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose. See, e.g., Sheldon, in 5 Blume 346; Rawle 123; Pomeroy 152–153; Abbott333. For example, the majority of the 19th-century courts to consider the question held that prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the Second Amendment
or state analogues. See, e.g., State v. Chandler, 5 La. Ann., at 489–490; Nunn v. State, 1 Ga., at 251; see generally 2 Kent *340, n. 2; The American Students’ Blackstone 84, n. 11 (G. Chase ed. 1884). Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment , nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.
Likewise, in State v. Chandler, 5La. Ann. 489, 490 (1850), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that citizens had a right to carry arms openly
: “This is the right guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States
, and which is calculated to incite men to a manly and noble defence of themselves, if necessary, and of their country, without any tendency to secret advantages and unmanly assassinations.” District of Columbia v. Heller, 128S.Ct. 2809 (2008)
SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, and ALITO, JJ., joined. STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which SOUTER, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined. BREYER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which STEVENS, SOUTER, and GINSBURG, JJ., joined.
Neither of Scalia's statements above re prohibiting concealed carry being constitutional, nor re open carry being the right guaranteed by the Constitution, were even mentioned, much less challenged by the the four opposing court justices who signed on to both the dissents. Obviously not opposed by the four other justices signing on to Scalia's opinion.