Current Federal law defines the "firearm" as the receiver (Stripped lower, complete lower, glock frame etc.)  When the 4473 is filled out at the gun shop or wherever, there's 3 options they can check; Handgun, Long Gun (rifles or shotguns) or Other Firearm (frame, receiver, etc.)

Stripped lowers and complete lowers are Other Firearm.  If registered that, then theres no need to return to them once its completed.  You could never ever complete the lower if you wanted.  The "firearm" is registered with them.  They also note it as "receiver only."

This is why you can mail/order every single gun part in the mail to your address, except for the lower receiver which has to be transferred through an FFL

Right to carry and mag ban lifted. It's a good week

Do not comply.

Same thing will happen when the lawmakers in Hawaii ban certain guns.  No reimbursement, no exceptions, just hand over your property or get arrested.

They already tried it with the medical marijuana owners, telling them to surrender their guns. Backpedaled on that when the national news got a hold of it.

Honestly, dont stress about it. Just dont go around waving your guns and you're fine.

Do not comply.

Maybe next time.  Unfortunately we're the only state that's not doing it.  Maybe when there's actual legislation threatening us.

https://vtdigger.org/2018/03/30/senate-narrowly-passes-expansive-gun-legislation/

Vermont Gov. stated he would sign 3 anti gun bills into law.

21+ to buy a gun
Handgun magazines to 15
Rifle/shotgun magazines to 10
More background checks

So ti continues.  On the plus side, Magpul has shipped a pallet of 30 round magazines over to Vermont, to be handed out for free to citizens.

http://www.recoilweb.com/free-pmags-to-be-given-away-in-vermont-to-oppose-gun-control-bill-136138.html

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/22/us/marjory-stoneman-douglas-clear-backpack-trnd/index.html

“I’m not happy with it. Why are you punishing me for one person’s actions?”


Well, well, well.....but its fine to punish all gun owners for others actions?

Hopefully they the suit is against all aspects of the law and not just the age requirement.  However, it will be interesting to see if the State brings up Hawaii's law of having to be 21 years of age to purchase a firearm and use it as an example.  And then if it is ruled invalid, what does that say about Hawaii's law.

First laws being passed for gun control at the state level since recent events.  Unless the governor vetoes it:

Increased firearm purchase age to 21
3 day waiting period for all firearms, unless you have a carry license
Ban of rate increasing devices
Confiscation of guns if you are deemed a risk to yourself or others

Florida is in for a fight.