I am wondering.  Is it legally provable that the shots never conferred any meaningful protection and even they are harmful, possible fatal?
I know they are in the process of releasing their papers.  Just from the incidental data especially with the rise on the side effects that could probably be meaningfully statistically correlated. 
Renz is on it but i don't see any major progress, just small chipping.
This is kind of leading to the tax payer funded commercials i see from the Hi dept of health.  Why are we spending money on these and if it is not safe or effective is there any sort of liability they carry for continuing to push the snake oil?

"team reality" is working on it all the time...

information coming out slowly
phizer data dumps are the first of the month
last month it was about possibly fake testing sites for the pahse 3 study
this month is that there are tons of pregnancy/birth issues that have gone unreported

I am wondering.  Is it legally provable that the shots never conferred any meaningful protection and even they are harmful, possible fatal?
I know they are in the process of releasing their papers.  Just from the incidental data especially with the rise on the side effects that could probably be meaningfully statistically correlated. 
Renz is on it but i don't see any major progress, just small chipping.
This is kind of leading to the tax payer funded commercials i see from the Hi dept of health.  Why are we spending money on these and if it is not safe or effective is there any sort of liability they carry for continuing to push the snake oil?