2aHawaii
General Topics => Legal and Activism => Topic started by: HiCarry on December 20, 2013, 10:25:21 AM
-
If you don't already do so, make it a point to visit "The War on Guns" blog. Here is a recent posting about the different outcomes in separate carjackings.... ( http://waronguns.blogspot.com/ (http://waronguns.blogspot.com/) )
http://www.examiner.com/article/foiled-carjacking-shows-different-outcome-potentials-when-gun-owners-have-choice (http://www.examiner.com/article/foiled-carjacking-shows-different-outcome-potentials-when-gun-owners-have-choice)
From the article: The question here is who has the moral authority to tell another human being they do not have a right to defend themselves? And that all such decisions will be made for them by armed functionaries of the state, who are under no legal obligation to protect those they so cavalierly deny a choice in the matter to…?