2aHawaii
General Topics => Legal and Activism => Topic started by: SpeedTek on July 16, 2015, 10:08:12 AM
-
Here we go again. 5 people dead including the shooter. Gun Free Zones? 2 areas. Officers shot chasing the suspect. Can't wait for more details. Witness said it was a big rifle. Oh boy.
-
Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez
Go Figure
-
As a member of our "armed" forces...give me back my rights to be armed and true meaning of the term ARMED forces of the USA! :grrr:
-
Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez
Go Figure
"Domestic terrorist"
-
Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez
Go Figure
But look at the likable smile!
-
(http://i1000.photobucket.com/albums/af127/heaviescc/tennessee-shooting_zps17ceiwtp.jpg) (http://i1000.photobucket.com/albums/af127/heaviescc/tennessee-shooting_zps17ceiwtp.jpg)
(http://i1000.photobucket.com/albums/af127/heaviescc/62208433-1eb2-43da-bf81-1b2cdc02932b_zpsaaoc3h1i.jpg) (http://i1000.photobucket.com/albums/af127/heaviescc/62208433-1eb2-43da-bf81-1b2cdc02932b_zpsaaoc3h1i.jpg)
-
(http://i1000.photobucket.com/albums/af127/heaviescc/tennessee-shooting_zps17ceiwtp.jpg) (http://i1000.photobucket.com/albums/af127/heaviescc/tennessee-shooting_zps17ceiwtp.jpg)
(http://i1000.photobucket.com/albums/af127/heaviescc/62208433-1eb2-43da-bf81-1b2cdc02932b_zpsaaoc3h1i.jpg) (http://i1000.photobucket.com/albums/af127/heaviescc/62208433-1eb2-43da-bf81-1b2cdc02932b_zpsaaoc3h1i.jpg)
cowardly
-
Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez
Go Figure
What a surprise.
No doubt Obunghole will pronounce it workplace violence or some other bullsqueeze to avoid implicating his favorite religion.
-
What a surprise.
No doubt Obunghole will pronounce it workplace violence or some other bullsqueeze to avoid implicating his favorite religion.
Obama is already using the catch phrase "lone gunman" to downplay his association with radical Islam.
https://youtu.be/tzB_dP9X2eI
-
Obama is already using the catch phrase "lone gunman" to downplay his association with radical Islam.
Nice double entendre there MD, well done.
:shaka:
-
Obama is already using the catch phrase "lone gunman" to downplay his association with radical Islam.
Is he associated with radical islam?
-
Is he associated with radical islam?
who? O bumma? I'd say most likely.
-
A NY Times article claims they don't know what the motive is for the shooting. What a bunch of morons!!!
-
But look at the likable smile!
...
I would be smiling too if I had 72 virgins waiting for me.
-
A NY Times article claims they don't know what the motive is for the shooting. What a bunch of morons!!!
yup
his name could be "isis allahu ahkbar" and they wouldn't know the motive
someone is going to have a youtube video with the timeline of when the charleston shooting happened and the president was talking about hate crimes and racism and gun violence
versus this tennessee shooting and all the president can say is "we have a name" and "the motive is unknown"
-
There's going to be agendas being pushed from all sides on this ....as usual. Watching the WH briefing this morNing ..a couple questions were asked about the attack then a reporter asked about the presidentS weekend time with his daughter/s and all of a sudden the mood went from a comment then giggling and smirking?! Really?! WTF kind of disrespectful and an awful way to respond is that crap?! . We all need to stay vigilant & let's make sure we (americans) dont/never get put in "checkmate".
Modified:: I'm going to re-apply for ccw again and for my reason for applying I will use this aND the past couple incidents as my "good cause". I know its taking up my time and money to reapply BUT now I feel like being a pain in the ass.
-
CNN talking head tries to drag the shooter's "Southern culture of guns" into the conversation in an obvious attempt to set up a dialog for gun control...
https://youtu.be/1FpSTW4BQRM
-
A NY Times article claims they don't know what the motive is for the shooting. What a bunch of morons!!!
Heaven forbid they try to be objective... Sure we can go around thinking it was radical islam related because of his name and the targets but good reporting should be neutral until more facts arrive. You think a prosecutor could win a court case off such weak circumstantial evidence?
-
Heaven forbid they try to be objective... Sure we can go around thinking it was radical islam related because of his name and the targets but good reporting should be neutral until more facts arrive. You think a prosecutor could win a court case off such weak circumstantial evidence?
being objective is one thing, but its pretty hard to not even MENTION that radical islam might have been involved considering he was Muslim, had just made a recent middle east visit, and shot up a military recruiting center of all places.
sure, it POSSIBLE it could have been another motive, but acting like the obvious explanation is somehow just as much a distant possibility as everything else IS part of the NY times bias.
-
Heaven forbid they try to be objective... Sure we can go around thinking it was radical islam related because of his name and the targets but good reporting should be neutral until more facts arrive. You think a prosecutor could win a court case off such weak circumstantial evidence?
Their objectivity is selective. They hide behind it when the truth doesn't fit their narrative. Then they jump to conclusions when it suits them.
The newspaper was criticized for largely reporting the prosecutors' version of events in the 2006 Duke lacrosse
case.[143][144] Suzanne Smalley of Newsweek criticized the newspaper for its "credulous"[145] coverage of the
charges of rape against Duke University lacrosse players. Stuart Taylor, Jr. and KC Johnson, in their book Until
Proven Innocent: Political Correctness and the Shameful Injustices of the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case, write: "at
the head of the guilt-presuming pack, The New York Times vied in a race to the journalistic bottom with trash-TV
talk shows."[146]
-
Their objectivity is selective. They hide behind it when the truth doesn't fit their narrative. Then they jump to conclusions when it suits them.
I would probably agree with you there, I just wouldn't go around claiming it was radical islam related as a standard the same reason I wouldn't go around claiming that a police shooting was racially motivated just because of the race of the cop/suspect. NY times is probably guilty of not following such a standard though.
-
:thumbsup: ARKANSAS :thumbsup: :thumbsup: ARKANSAS :thumbsup: :thumbsup: ARKANSAS :thumbsup: :thumbsup: ARKANSAS :thumbsup:
(http://i.imgur.com/3UjM3sY.png)
-
Unfortunately, Governor Hutchinson's authority extends only to his state's National Guard.
-
being objective is one thing, but its pretty hard to not even MENTION that radical islam might have been involved considering he was Muslim, had just made a recent middle east visit, and shot up a military recruiting center of all places.
sure, it POSSIBLE it could have been another motive, but acting like the obvious explanation is somehow just as much a distant possibility as everything else IS part of the NY times bias.
no idea of the motive, huh?
3 days before, he attends a rally protesting the release of a guy who wanted to bomb a muslim community
2 days before, he makes his only 2 blog posts ever, quoting the koran and other other islamic ideologies
then shoots up 2 military offices
nope, no clear motive
-
Huzzah to Arkansas NG!!! Maybe an IST is in order...
-
Huzzah to Arkansas NG!!! Maybe an IST is in order...
Let's see how soon the rest of the patriot states fall in line.
Not holding my breath waiting for New York and California!
-
:thumbsup: OKLAHOMA :thumbsup: :thumbsup: OKLAHOMA :thumbsup: :thumbsup: OKLAHOMA :thumbsup:
(http://i.imgur.com/J9pdcQT.png)
-
no idea of the motive, huh?
3 days before, he attends a rally protesting the release of a guy who wanted to bomb a muslim community
2 days before, he makes his only 2 blog posts ever, quoting the koran and other other islamic ideologies
then shoots up 2 military offices
nope, no clear motive
I am not talking motive but an actual substantial link to another group to show he wasn't a lone gunman.
-
I am not talking motive but an actual substantial link to another group to show he wasn't a lone gunman.
You must not be paying attention. How large was the "group" the Boston Marathon Bombers belonged to?
The threat today is radicalized INDIVIDUALS willing to carry out attacks on a small scale and hurt, kill, and terrorize as many as they can.
You should watch the Charles Bronson movie, "Telefon." It might enlighten you to the danger posed by threats of 1 or 2 people being directed by a common cause or entity.
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep.
-
Sailor in Chattanooga shooting has died, death toll now 5
(not counting the terrorist)
The Navy says that the sailor who was shot Thursday in an attack at a military support center in Chattanooga, Tenn. has died.
The sailor was one of three people injured when a gunman opened fire, killing four Marines.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/18/sailor-in-chattanooga-shooting-has-died-death-toll-now-5/
:(
-
Heaven forbid they try to be objective... Sure we can go around thinking it was radical islam related because of his name and the targets but good reporting should be neutral until more facts arrive. You think a prosecutor could win a court case off such weak circumstantial evidence?
I am not a betting man, but I would be willing to bet that even after it comes out that Radical Islam is the reason behind this that the NY Times will still not admit this was the reason for it.
-
:thumbsup: to OK and AR (how appropriate)
The jihadi lone wolf threats are not exactly a new thing.
We have been talking about arming service members locally for a pretty long time, eh?
-
(http://i1000.photobucket.com/albums/af127/heaviescc/tennessee-shooting_zps17ceiwtp.jpg) (http://i1000.photobucket.com/albums/af127/heaviescc/tennessee-shooting_zps17ceiwtp.jpg)
(http://i1000.photobucket.com/albums/af127/heaviescc/62208433-1eb2-43da-bf81-1b2cdc02932b_zpsaaoc3h1i.jpg) (http://i1000.photobucket.com/albums/af127/heaviescc/62208433-1eb2-43da-bf81-1b2cdc02932b_zpsaaoc3h1i.jpg)
clearly the sign itself is bullet proof, in fact the sign itself probably deflected a few projectiles without leaving a mark, now that is true effectiveness.
-
Were flags at half mast today?
-
You must not be paying attention. How large was the "group" the Boston Marathon Bombers belonged to?
The threat today is radicalized INDIVIDUALS willing to carry out attacks on a small scale and hurt, kill, and terrorize as many as they can.
You should watch the Charles Bronson movie, "Telefon." It might enlighten you to the danger posed by threats of 1 or 2 people being directed by a common cause or entity.
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep.
You suggested that Obama was using the phrase "lone gunman" to downplay a link to radical islam. Now you say these "individuals." Was he a lone gunman or not? If he acted on his own volition then he is a lone gunman whether or not radical islam is what inspired him. Obama's referring to him as a lone gunman is not an attempt to downplay a link to radical islam, that is just a weak sauce attack against Obama.
-
You suggested that Obama was using the phrase "lone gunman" to downplay a link to radical islam. Now you say these "individuals." Was he a lone gunman or not? If he acted on his own volition then he is a lone gunman whether or not radical islam is what inspired him. Obama's referring to him as a lone gunman is not an attempt to downplay a link to radical islam, that is just a weak sauce attack against Obama.
Are you really going to parse my word-choices as if I don't know what I'm saying?
Individual = person = shooter = terrorist
Are you trolling me, or are you really that desperate for an argument you're grasping at "it depends on what the definition of "is" is?"
-
You suggested that Obama was using the phrase "lone gunman" to downplay a link to radical islam. Now you say these "individuals." Was he a lone gunman or not? If he acted on his own volition then he is a lone gunman whether or not radical islam is what inspired him. Obama's referring to him as a lone gunman is not an attempt to downplay a link to radical islam, that is just a weak sauce attack against Obama.
It isn't a matter of what Obama called the shooter, but more what he did not call him.
Obama downplays every act of violence by anyone who based on their name and heritage is in all likelihood a Muslim. He has made statements in the past about refraining from using these incidents to blame the entire Muslim community. He makes that his point as opposed to naming the REAL enemy who caused the deaths: RADICAL ISLAM. He and his media and administration are trying to control the narrative.
If this had been a white guy with apparent racist views, do you really believe he would refrain from taking advantage of that and calling the US a racist country --- again?
The fact that this took place in a black church obviously also raises questions about a dark part of our history. This is not the
first time that black churches have been attacked. And we know that hatred across races and faiths pose a particular threat to
our democracy and our ideals.
http://www.wistv.com/story/29353444/transcript-of-president-obamas-remarks-on-charleston-shooting
-
It isn't a matter of what Obama called the shooter, but more what he did not call him.
Obama downplays every act of violence by anyone who based on their name and heritage is in all likelihood a Muslim. He has made statements in the past about refraining from using these incidents to blame the entire Muslim community. He makes that his point as opposed to naming the REAL enemy who caused the deaths: RADICAL ISLAM. He and his media and administration are trying to control the narrative.
If this had been a white guy with apparent racist views, do you really believe he would refrain from taking advantage of that and calling the US a racist country --- again?
http://www.wistv.com/story/29353444/transcript-of-president-obamas-remarks-on-charleston-shooting
exactly
pretty much the minute the charleston shooting happened, he was playing up the hate crime/racism/attacking a church thing
this time it was "lone gunman" and "the motive is unknown at this time"
-
It isn't a matter of what Obama called the shooter, but more what he did not call him.
Obama downplays every act of violence by anyone who based on their name and heritage is in all likelihood a Muslim. He has made statements in the past about refraining from using these incidents to blame the entire Muslim community. He makes that his point as opposed to naming the REAL enemy who caused the deaths: RADICAL ISLAM. He and his media and administration are trying to control the narrative.
If this had been a white guy with apparent racist views, do you really believe he would refrain from taking advantage of that and calling the US a racist country --- again?
I try not to assume motives and don't like cheap shots even if it is someone I am opposed to.
Just keep in mind that the president is the face of the nation and has a certain amount of power/responsibility to keep things balanced. I am sure with all his security briefings he knows the threats radical islam presents but we still want to keep order. The last thing we want is for americans to get into some crowd frenzy and start attacking muslims or arabs out of anger or fear. It doesn't necessarily have to be that he is a secret muslim or he just wants to cater to muslims. Whats wrong with him saying separating radical muslims and the rest of the muslim population? We all know radical islam is dangerous but sometimes people are stupid and need to be reminded not all muslims around us are bad.
Now sure he seems guilty of pouring gas on the fire in other situations but I don't think the choice of the phrase lone gunman was trying to minimize radical islam.
-
exactly
pretty much the minute the charleston shooting happened, he was playing up the hate crime/racism/attacking a church thing
this time it was "lone gunman" and "the motive is unknown at this time"
she's hot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8Q0MMHwx4k
-
exactly
pretty much the minute the charleston shooting happened, he was playing up the hate crime/racism/attacking a church thing
this time it was "lone gunman" and "the motive is unknown at this time"
Charleston was useful to his agenda. Protecting muzzies is also part of his agenda.
It is far past time for some to accept that his act is only to serve part of this country, the left, and to hell with the rest of us. He does not care what we think and truly does not represent us.
The fact that he would fly the flag at half mast for Whitney Houston and not for the murdered Marines makes this achingly clear.
-
New details emerge in Chattanooga shooting: http://www.kitv.com/national/new-details-emerge-in-chattanooga-shooting/34249798?absolute=true
In the same way that ISIS is not Islamic, the Chatanooga shooter is not motivated by Islamic terroristic ideology but instead has depression, drug problems and access to firearms. </sarcasm off>
-
Charleston was useful to his agenda. Protecting muzzies is also part of his agenda.
It is far past time for some to accept that his act is only to serve part of this country, the left, and to hell with the rest of us. He does not care what we think and truly does not represent us.
The fact that he would fly the flag at half mast for Whitney Houston and not for the murdered Marines makes this achingly clear.
All kinds of fuckery going down. Like you said The president has made it pretty clear where he stands. So quick to light the White House in rainbow, lower the flag for Whitney, but can't do it for these American heroes who were murdered on our own soil?! Come on , PC BS. On another note ...you see the armed citizens showing up to support & stand gaurd outside recruiting offices? Now that's what's up, Awesome.
-
I identify as black. O0
Today.
-
Just in the interest of accuracy... The President did not order half-masting the American Flag following the death of Whitney Houston. Lots of credible sources out there that confirm this. :stopjack:
-
I'm white today.
-
I'm white today.
Just curious, what do u feel like being tomorrow?
-
U.S. Flags Lowered For Mandela, A Rare Honor For Foreign Leaders
Dec 6, 2013
After the death of Nelson Mandela, President Obama ordered that U.S. flags on government buildings be flown at half-staff until
Monday evening — a symbolic gesture of a nation in mourning.
The rules also allow the president to decide other periods of mourning when the half-staff is warranted. Most recently, Obama ordered
the lowering of the flag to honor the victims of the Washington Navy Yard shooting and for the 50th anniversary of President John F.
Kennedy's assassination.
But it's uncommon for the U.S. flag to be lowered in honor of foreign leaders' deaths. Obama issued a statement of mourning earlier
this year after the death of Margaret Thatcher, former prime minister of the United Kingdom, but he didn't order the lowering of the
American flag. In fact, the last foreign dignitary to be memorialized with the flag was Pope John Paul II in 2005.
Obama seems to be inconsistent in his decisions on when to order the flags to be lowered,
-
FINALLY !!
Obama orders flags to half staff at White House for Chattanooga victims
The White House and U.S. Capitol both lowered flags to half staff by Tuesday afternoon, after they were out of sync Tuesday in their tributes to the five U.S. service members who were slain by a gunman in Chattanooga last week.
House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky announced Tuesday that flags at the Capitol would be lowered to half-staff in honor of the victims.
"Out of respect for their courageous service and sacrifice to our nation, flags at the U.S. Capitol are being lowered to half-staff," Boehner said in a statement.
"I don't have more information about the status of the flag over the White House," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters Monday. Earnest had nearly the same response for reporters Tuesday.
-
I'm white today.
but you'll be native american tomorrow.
-
New details emerge in Chattanooga shooting: http://www.kitv.com/national/new-details-emerge-in-chattanooga-shooting/34249798?absolute=true
In the same way that ISIS is not Islamic, the Chatanooga shooter is not motivated by Islamic terroristic ideology but instead has depression, drug problems and access to firearms. </sarcasm off>
To be clear, regardless of his motivation by terroristic islam ideology, depression and drug problems should not be ignored. It helps us form a better understanding of what happened.
-
but you'll be native american tomorrow.
I vote for primate.
-
Governors in at least half a dozen states announced over the weekend that their military personnel will no longer be unarmed.
The landmark decision came following a terrorist attack at a recruiting center and reserve station in Chattanooga, Tennessee,
Thursday that left five servicemen dead.
Indiana (R),
Florida (D),
Texas (R),
Louisiana (R),
Arkansas (R) and
Oklahoma (R)
are among the states that will soon allow National Guardsmen and other military personnel to carry guns at military facilities, the
Associated Press reported.
R/D = How the state cast its electoral votes in the Presidential Election of 2012
Tennessee (R)? Hello!! Don't be shy!
:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
-
At a Tennessee Walmart this week ...
https://youtu.be/pR4SSgzq8GY
Flash mob sings national anthem in Tennessee stores
CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE —
A choir in Tennessee finished their performance, but inspired by the music, they decided to share it with their community.
Their spontaneous act of honoring the fallen servicemen in Chattanooga then grew into something much more.
When Amy Hall started the "Spring Hill Harmonx" a year ago, she wasn't looking for fame or fortune. She just wanted to
be part of a group that made people feel good. The choir had just wrapped up at the city council meeting when they decided
to do a little flash mobbing. Belting it out right in front of the cosmetics counter and unsuspecting customers and staff at Target.
Then Walmart. Then Lowe's Home Improvement. Customers loved it.
Videos of their performances at the various stores have been posted all over social media. One video from Walmart alone has already been viewed nearly a million times.
http://www.wpxi.com/news/news/flash-mob-sings-national-anthem-tennessee-stores/nm5St/
-
Check this mornings paper.
Reported at least 2 service members were armed at navy training center and at least 1 returned fire.
Report states much worse event was averted due to actions of the slain service members.
-
At a Tennessee Walmart this week ...
https://youtu.be/pR4SSgzq8GY
chances we will see that here? Keeaumoku WalMart?
-
At a Tennessee Walmart this week ...
https://youtu.be/pR4SSgzq8GY
how is this related in any way other than location?
-
how is this related in any way other than location?
Activism.....
-
I'm black today O0
-
I'm black today O0
How did you change to White?
I thought once you go Black, you never go back?!?!? :geekdanc: :rofl:
-
How did you change to White?
I thought once you go Black, you never go back?!?!? :geekdanc: :rofl:
All I want is acceptance from my fellow Americans. After all this country is a melting pot of all races - whomever race or sex we identify with.
-
Activism.....
which is expressly related to this, how?
sorry, just not seeing anything connecting that incident or the video to this, at all, other than a vague sense of "we're not gonna lose to terror". like, we dont know ANYTHING about the video or situation other than "Tennessee walmart" and "public display of patriotism".
-
All I want is acceptance from my fellow Americans. After all this country is a melting pot of all races - whomever race or sex we identify with.
When they said "Melting Pot", I always thought it was a figure of speech, not a process for changing your own physical traits! It sounds extremely painful!
-
which is expressly related to this, how?
sorry, just not seeing anything connecting that incident or the video to this, at all, other than a vague sense of "we're not gonna lose to terror". like, we dont know ANYTHING about the video or situation other than "Tennessee walmart" and "public display of patriotism".
When you say "we [don't] know ANYTHING about the video or situation," you really mean YOU [don't] know ANYTHING about the video or situation.
-
When you say "we [don't] know ANYTHING about the video or situation," you really mean YOU [don't] know ANYTHING about the video or situation.
and how do YOU know?
the video has no description, and nothing other than the thing itself. there's absolutely no context whatsoever supplied, and if you know the context (which matters), then why would you post it without that context? i say WE because you gave no indication that you knew anything either.
-
How did you change to White?
I thought once you go Black, you never go back?!?!? :geekdanc: :rofl:
https://youtu.be/XzNyLN4MRo0?t=4m19s
-
and how do YOU know?
the video has no description, and nothing other than the thing itself. there's absolutely no context whatsoever supplied, and if you know the context (which matters), then why would you post it without that context?
I don't rely on just one source. I felt the video speaks for itself to those who will hear it. Trust me when I say, it's related to the shooting.
-
I don't rely on just one source. I felt the video speaks for itself to those who will hear it. Trust me when I say, it's related to the shooting.
well, im not about to just automatically connect something to a shooting with no context. sorry. i dont work that way, and surely you could see why im thinking this way. that video absolutely does not speak for itself without the context. hell, we dont even know when it was filmed. this could have happened years ago for all you know.. we know when it was uploaded.
it sounds like there's an article attached to this, so why not post the article instead of the video sans context?
in fact, i did that myself, which provides the proper context, im just pointing something out here.
posting this:
http://6abc.com/shopping/walmart-shoppers-sing-national-anthem-in-patriotic-viral-video/869363/ (http://6abc.com/shopping/walmart-shoppers-sing-national-anthem-in-patriotic-viral-video/869363/)
means infinitely more than posting someone's cell phone video out of context with no accompanying information.
-
well, im not about to just automatically connect something to a shooting with no context. sorry. i dont work that way, and surely you could see why im thinking this way. that video absolutely does not speak for itself without the context. hell, we dont even know when it was filmed. this could have happened years ago for all you know.. we know when it was uploaded.
it sounds like there's an article attached to this, so why not post the article instead of the video sans context?
Is your Google broken, or you just want to give me a hard time. If the latter, it's not working! :geekdanc: :rofl: :wave:
-
Is your Google broken, or you just want to give me a hard time. If the latter, it's not working! :geekdanc: :rofl: :wave:
im giving you a hard time because posting something like that out of context makes the post worthless to the discussion, and people shouldnt have to google the background of a video to make the connections for the post to make sense.
that, and after constantly watching terrible politicians take studies, stats, videos and quotes out of context to support gun control, i hate seeing people do that exact same thing here. without the context, it could be just about anything.
-
im giving you a hard time because posting something like that out of context makes the post worthless to the discussion, and people shouldnt have to google the background of a video to make the connections for the post to make sense.
that, and after constantly watching terrible politicians take studies, stats, videos and quotes out of context to support gun control, i hate seeing people do that exact same thing here. without the context, it could be just about anything.
Since the video is not out of context, you are out of line.
You being unable to find the proper context on your own isn't my problem. Had you asked politely, I would have given you the link, even though I didn't have that information when I posted it. All I had was the Facebook post. A little Googling is all it took and that is way quicker than typing all the BS you did here.
The video was updated. Have a nice day. And if you need an orientation on how to find things on the Internet, just PM me! I'm here for you!
:thumbsup:
-
Since the video is not out of context, you are out of line.
You being unable to find the proper context on your own isn't my problem. Had you asked politely, I would have given you the link, even though I didn't have that information when I posted it. All I had was the Facebook post. A little Googling is all it took and that is way quicker than typing all the BS you did here.
The video was updated. Have a nice day. And if you need an orientation on how to find things on the Internet, just PM me! I'm here for you!
:thumbsup:
i wasnt unable. if you noticed, i found the news story already. i knew the context for a while. like i said, that wasnt my point.
-
i wasnt unable. if you noticed, i found the news story already. i knew the context for a while. like i said, that wasnt my point.
You had a point? It must have gotten lost in the 7 off-topic comments you added since I posted the video which only you whined about.
:stopjack: :stopjack: :stopjack:
-
Well, this is going to be awkward at the Christmas Party!!! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
-
Well, this is going to be awkward at the Christmas Party!!! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
We'll have to have an arm wrestling competition or something.
-
I thought it was a feel-good, patriotic, red blooded American act caught on video. That's why I posted it.
Some people just don't get it.