2aHawaii
General Topics => General Discussion => Topic started by: 6716J on October 11, 2018, 08:36:25 PM
-
https://newsblaze.com/business/legal/california-nra-fight-open-carry_142024/
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
-
https://newsblaze.com/business/legal/california-nra-fight-open-carry_142024/
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
"By Charles Nichols"
-
The website started talking to me so I left before reading anything useful
-
"By Charles Nichols"
So... that's the totality of your refutation of the arguments in the article?
Will you grant the same authoritative status if I post "Harvey Gerwig" in response to some article by HRA?
-
So... that's the totality of your refutation of the arguments in the article?
Will you grant the same authoritative status if I post "Harvey Gerwig" in response to some article by HRA?
Yes.
https://www.crpa.org/crpa-news/crpanews-alert-fighting-for-your-right-to-carry-in-ca/
-
Yes.
https://www.crpa.org/crpa-news/crpanews-alert-fighting-for-your-right-to-carry-in-ca/
"By CRPA"
-
The website started talking to me so I left before reading anything useful
being forewarned, I skipped to the last paragraph and got most of that, before unsolicited Sally the cartoon newsblaze editor started talking. and that's when I left.
-
Yes.
https://www.crpa.org/crpa-news/crpanews-alert-fighting-for-your-right-to-carry-in-ca/
"But it is imperative that Second Amendment cases be brought by plaintiffs with experienced attorneys who competently and expertly evaluate and litigate the issues to maximize the chances of success. Just like a classic car collector wouldn’t want his or her cars to be repaired by someone who has only read a “how-to” book, gun owners cannot afford to risk their Second Amendment rights in litigation by inexperienced counsel or, worse, someone who does not even have a license to practice law. The CRPA’s and NRA’s experienced team of lawyers, scholars, and experts are dedicated to minimizing the impact of cases brought by misguided individuals, while simultaneously advancing your Second Amendment rights in the courtroom by bringing well-crafted cases that will maximize the potential for success. NRA and CRPA urge you to direct any well-intentioned individuals who may be thinking of filing a Second Amendment lawsuit to contact them before doing so."
Is that a dig at Mr. Young and Mr. Beck (aka Wolfwood) ?
If I'm not mistaken Mr. Young filed pro se initially. And Mr. Beck took on the case pro bono when none of these organizations would touch it.
Now they want to sabotage it?
Am I missing something? ( or a lot of things)
-
"But it is imperative that Second Amendment cases be brought by plaintiffs with experienced attorneys who competently and expertly evaluate and litigate the issues to maximize the chances of success. Just like a classic car collector wouldn’t want his or her cars to be repaired by someone who has only read a “how-to” book, gun owners cannot afford to risk their Second Amendment rights in litigation by inexperienced counsel or, worse, someone who does not even have a license to practice law. The CRPA’s and NRA’s experienced team of lawyers, scholars, and experts are dedicated to minimizing the impact of cases brought by misguided individuals, while simultaneously advancing your Second Amendment rights in the courtroom by bringing well-crafted cases that will maximize the potential for success. NRA and CRPA urge you to direct any well-intentioned individuals who may be thinking of filing a Second Amendment lawsuit to contact them before doing so."
Is that a dig at Mr. Young and Mr. Beck (aka Wolfwood) ?
If I'm not mistaken Mr. Young filed pro se initially. And Mr. Beck took on the case pro bono when none of these organizations would touch it.
Now they want to sabotage it?
Am I missing something? ( or a lot of things)
They are talking about Charles Nichols (pretty much the whole article is)
-
Gotcha.
Thanks London. :shaka: