2aHawaii
General Topics => General Discussion => Topic started by: Bota-CS1 on April 03, 2019, 12:57:05 PM
-
Poll on the SA website asking if readers approve of the way the chief is handling permits to carry on public. If you have access please vote.
-
Poll on the SA website asking if readers approve of the way the chief is handling permits to carry on public. If you have access please vote.
Isn't the poll on their FB page?
-
https://www.staradvertiser.com/staradvertiser-poll/support-local-police-chiefs-handling-requests-handguncarry-permits/
-
https://www.facebook.com/staradvertiser/
Defintely 123
No 1.5k
-
Wow over 1500 voters and 93% say no. Wonder is she would read it.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
-
https://www.facebook.com/staradvertiser/
Defintely 123
No 1.5k
the fb poll anyone can vote on, and is extremely heavily favoring NO
online poll you have to be a registered member of the site, and is favoring YES
guess which results they are going to accept?
-
the fb poll anyone can vote on, and is extremely heavily favoring NO
online poll you have to be a registered member of the site, and is favoring YES
guess which results they are going to accept?
that's why I posted - they're more apt to "believe" paying subscribers than "outside agitators" irregardless they're going to do what they want to do anyway.
-
SB
Definitely 335 49.85%
No 270 40.18%
Mixed 67 9.97%
672
FB
Definitely 203 7.24%
No 2,600 92.76%
2,803
-
SB
Definitely 335 49.85%
No 270 40.18%
Mixed 67 9.97%
672
FB
Definitely 203 7.24%
No 2,600 92.76%
2,803
And this is how polls work,
When media targets their audience the results will always show a bias towards what their agenda is. The public in general tho may have a different response.
-
And this is how polls work,
When media targets their audience the results will always show a bias towards what their agenda is. The public in general tho may have a different response.
Imagine if Breitbart was a pay site like the Star-Advertiser is, what the results of a "gun rights" poll would be. Does anyone think the "mainstream media" would give such a poll an ounce of credibility? Laughable.
-
SB
Definitely 335 49.85%
No 270 40.18%
Mixed 67 9.97%
672
FB
Definitely 203 7.24%
No 2,600 92.76%
2,803
....
Amazing!
Can you imagine the newspaper running the state elections office?
Oh wait, never mind. They already do :rofl:
-
....
Amazing!
Can you imagine the newspaper running the state elections office?
Oh wait, never mind. They already do :rofl:
Maybe SA has more liberals compared to FB? Responses on FB in general support the 2a.
-
Maybe SA has more liberals compared to FB? Responses on FB in general support the 2a.
I'd say. I wouldn't line a puppy pan with that rag as it may infect the puppy with a disease. It's 90 % biased, full of nonsense, and goes out daily with little regard to proof reading or editing. Good thing I'm fluent in pigeon English otherwise it would be completely confounding to read.. I refuse to spend money to buy it, not even the coupons are worth the trouble.
-
I'd say. I wouldn't line a puppy pan with that rag as it may infect the puppy with a disease. It's 90 % biased, full of nonsense, and goes out daily with little regard to proof reading or editing. Good thing I'm fluent in pigeon English otherwise it would be completely confounding to read.. I refuse to spend money to buy it, not even the coupons are worth the trouble.
My feelings as well. I moved here in 1993 from the South. I could not believe there could be such a biased, one-sided pair of newspapers in a city, much less a state, as the Honolulu Star-Bulletin and Honolulu Advertiser. I took the paper for the free trial month, and I canceled it before paying a cent.
I admit I've purchased the Advertiser on a few Sundays for the ads and coupons, but that's all the revenue they've gotten from me. Once stores' advertising and promotions upgraded to online digital format, I've saved more from newspaper costs than the coupons were worth.
And their classified ads for "Autos For Sale" are outrageously priced.