2aHawaii
General Topics => General Discussion => Topic started by: Oyabunsan on June 04, 2021, 07:01:58 PM
-
A friend who lives in CA was just complaining about not having the “cool” rifles he wants to have... he may have a better chance of getting these rifles now.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/06/04/judge-rules-californias-assault-weapons-ban-unconstitutional/
-
One step farther to taking the commie out of commiefornia
-
The ruling is 94 pages:
https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/5381/attachments/original/1622850515/Miller_v_Bonta_Opinion.pdf?1622850515
The first line of the decision reads:
Like the Swiss Army Knife, the popular AR-15 rifle is a perfect combination of
home defense weapon and homeland defense equipment. Good for both home and battle,
the AR-15 is the kind of versatile gun that lies at the intersection of the kinds of firearms
protected under District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) and United States v
Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939). Yet, the State of California makes it a crime to have an AR15
type rifle. Therefore, this Court declares the California statutes to be unconstitutional
So, out of 94 pages, what is the main thing the press, anti-gun zealots, the CA governor, and all the other 2A haters get bent out of shape over?
"Swiss Army Knife!" :wacko:
The judge used the comparison to show how VERSATILE the AR-15 is, just like a Swiss Army Knife is able to perform so many tasks and functions,
But, of course, the idiots are trying to say the judge stated the AR-15 is like a Swiss Army Knife -- as if both tools' functions are the same.
If that's all they have out of such a lengthy decision, then I think they are grasping at straws -- as usual.
-
https://2ahawaii.com/index.php?topic=41669.new#new