2aHawaii
General Topics => Political Discussion => Topic started by: aletheuo137 on August 09, 2022, 12:11:13 PM
-
https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2022/08/09/2020-election-doubts-fuel-more-observers-2022/
Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk
-
What they don't realize is it's easy to change the tally one inputted. And we have seen the voting violations on the mainland for the presidential election and nothing happened. So who's gonna care about a local election.
-
There shouldn't be fractional voting either. I have a feeling that the steal will be through the mail ins. Watching people vote is one thing, Counting is another. I dont think the observers will be able to see what the tallies are. And even rectify any inconsistency they might find. Plus the votes are all computer counted but there is still a paper trail which c can be recounted if necessary.
I guess.
-
There shouldn't be fractional voting either. I have a feeling that the steal will be through the mail ins. Watching people vote is one thing, Counting is another. I dont think the observers will be able to see what the tallies are. And even rectify any inconsistency they might find. Plus the votes are all computer counted but there is still a paper trail which c can be recounted if necessary.
I guess.
You should really read the election fraud thread. It goes over all of this and how easy it is to change the tally on computers, how there's no custody once the ballot is removed from the envelope, etc...
I know it's a lot of pages to read, but there is lots of good info in there. Long story short, there are ways around the voting system which even if caught, go unenforced. I only vote so I can complain. No vote, no grumble. Or vote for X, no complain.
-
There shouldn't be fractional voting either. I have a feeling that the steal will be through the mail ins. Watching people vote is one thing, Counting is another. I dont think the observers will be able to see what the tallies are. And even rectify any inconsistency they might find. Plus the votes are all computer counted but there is still a paper trail which c can be recounted if necessary.
I guess.
Georgia was a perfect example of how easy it is to manipulate a recount. Instead of recounting all the votes, they just counted the ballots to "prove" they had the same number of paper ballots as votes reported. :crazy:
The error rate of voting machines was massive when reading in paper ballots, so even if they did rescan all the ballots, the same corrects/changes/fraudulent edits would have had to be accomplished the exact same way to make the tallies match.
Yeah, paper ballots IN THEORY could be used to validate election results ... unless the actual results contradict the official ones.
-
Georgia was a perfect example of how easy it is to manipulate a recount. Instead of recounting all the votes, they just counted the ballots to "prove" they had the same number of paper ballots as votes reported. :crazy:
The error rate of voting machines was massive when reading in paper ballots, so even if they did rescan all the ballots, the same corrects/changes/fraudulent edits would have had to be accomplished the exact same way to make the tallies match.
Yeah, paper ballots IN THEORY could be used to validate election results ... unless the actual results contradict the official ones.
Don't forget they also separated the envelopes. So no way of knowing which bad envelope was for which ballot. All stated in the election fraud thread in much greater details.
-
Check out Chief Elections Officer Scott Nago's demeanor in that news clip. He's sweating, indignant, and petulant.
That guy has a huge pile of skeletons in his closet and is panicking right now.
He would have a different attitude if this was slam dunk fraud.
The grassroots strategy that Steve Bannon promoted is working.
Keep up the pressure!
(https://media3.giphy.com/media/4bWWKmUnn5E4/giphy.gif?cid=ecf05e47qfgykb4l6sn696atiyvvhg3gkst7o0rs7q3obywn&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g)