2aHawaii
General Topics => Political Discussion => Topic started by: QUIETShooter on February 21, 2024, 07:55:39 AM
-
Do you blame people for thinking that? How can so called "IT" people fail to see this glitch in the software.
Trust was more common in the past and not given freely nowadays.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/internet-backs-jesse-watters-after-he-questions-claim-that-unmailed-ballots-in-nevada-were-shown-as-counted-due-to-glitch/ar-BB1iDSLd?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=ee207c96288b427a98d8f56c2e356b14&ei=11
-
Do you blame people for thinking that? How can so called "IT" people fail to see this glitch in the software.
Trust was more common in the past and not given freely nowadays.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/internet-backs-jesse-watters-after-he-questions-claim-that-unmailed-ballots-in-nevada-were-shown-as-counted-due-to-glitch/ar-BB1iDSLd?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=ee207c96288b427a98d8f56c2e356b14&ei=11
Because the Dems try to stop counting and certify the results the second their chosen candidate is ahead.
Any audits are also run by those same people, and the process is horribly broken. In Georgia, they created an impossible task of auditing mail-in ballots. By separating the signed envelopes from the ballots they contained, if a signature was deemed incorrect or missing during an audit, there's no way to withdraw that ballot's selections from the totals.
On top of that, the people doing the audit were told by their Dem elections officials to not worry about who the ballots were cast for. They only wanted a count of physical paper ballots to verify the number counted by the machines matched. So, if there were 10,000 blank ballots to offset 10,000 phantom votes for Biden that were caused by workers re-scanning the same stacks of Biden ballots multiple times, the audit shows it's all good.
So many other examples of how that old adage is alive and well today: "It's not the people who vote that count, it's the people who count the votes." That was a quote loosely attributed to Stalin.
-
We should go back to the old days where you vote in person. Takes longer but something as important as an election is worth it.
Seems like the demorats like to rush things.
It also seems to be common practice now in Congress when they do legislation. Bundle a whole crapola of legislation together, hide a few important ones "they" don't want anyone to know about then try to ram, cram, and shove the damn thing through without anyone even reading the text.
Oh by the way, the text is 1 trillion words long and you have 47 hrs and 15 minutes to go through it.
Then vote.
-
We should go back to the old days where you vote in person. Takes longer but something as important as an election is worth it.
Seems like the demorats like to rush things.
It also seems to be common practice now in Congress when they do legislation. Bundle a whole crapola of legislation together, hide a few important ones "they" don't want anyone to know about then try to ram, cram, and shove the damn thing through without anyone even reading the text.
Oh by the way, the text is 1 trillion words long and you have 47 hrs and 15 minutes to go through it.
Then vote.
It;s not about rushing things. It's about creating a system in which the maximum number of bodies -- living or dead -- are casting ballots.
Dems know that the people they cater to are less likely to stand in line and vote. That's just 'too establishment" for them to participate. The younger generations are worse. If they can't swipe left or right, they aren't voting on it!
Early and mail-in voting makes it not only more likely the Dem voters cast ballots, but the mail-in system is so full of holes, it's improbable that the people running the elections have enough safeguards to prevent elections from being stolen.
Even Jimmy Carter knew mail-in ballots were too risky for such an important Constitutional duty -- yet here we are.