2aHawaii
General Topics => Political Discussion => Topic started by: Flapp_Jackson on October 11, 2025, 06:16:51 PM
-
Another example of the crazy antics from a Trump hater who attacked a man wearing a MAGA hat.
https://youtu.be/mqDVbRYoOZE
-
Maybe a little of both.
Imagine she getting attacked just because she had blue/purple hair.
I say imagine because sane rational people would not do that.
TDS is real and as a taxpayer I hope I don't have to help pay for the treatment if one day it becomes a pandemic.
-
There has been a large spike in psychotic behavior since the clot shots, and liberals are more likely to have multiple boosters since that is part of their religion. She’s also a healthcare worker so it’s more likely that she’s up to date.
-
TDS is how you know you’re exactly over target.
They now uncontrollably self-identify at the drop of a hat.
Pavlov’s dogs are gettin a bit jelly.
-
There has been a large spike in psychotic behavior since the clot shots, and liberals are more likely to have multiple boosters since that is part of their religion. She’s also a healthcare worker so it’s more likely that she’s up to date.
This ties back to another discussion. Since she's in healthcare, would you feel comfortable having her treat you in the event she finds out you support Trump?
I'm sure every patient that visits where she works gets an earful of her insane TDS, so it's plausible she meets many who would disagree with her.
Someone might want to check the fatalities where she has ever worked and investigate "irregularities."
-
This ties back to another discussion. Since she's in healthcare, would you feel comfortable having her…
Someone might want to check the fatalities where she has ever worked and investigate "irregularities."
Nurse serial killers are not that uncommon, and some of them killed hundreds before they got caught because hospitals are eager to overlook medical errors that could result in lawsuits.
-
Never wear a MAGA hat to a colonoscopy.
-
Nurse serial killers are not that uncommon, and some of them killed hundreds before they got caught because hospitals are eager to overlook medical errors that could result in lawsuits.
That, and you'd expect a medical professional to know how to hide the cause of death better than the average psycho.
I've seen true crime cases where insulin overdoses were ignored by medical examiners when patients had diabetes. I saw one where patients on respirators had the machines turned off and back on in a way that didn't trigger alarms or leave a record. So many existing medical problems, so many M.O.s.
-
Never wear a MAGA hat to a colonoscopy.
That depends on which end of the scope you're on!
-
That depends on which end of the scope you're on!
Makes all the difference in the world!
-
There are always going to be a certain percentage of people who either can't control their emotions or think it acceptable to attack people for their free speech. These people exist on both sides, I see examples of unhinged lefties and righties attacking the other side though they seem to be a little more common on the left.
-
There are always going to be a certain percentage of people who either can't control their emotions or think it acceptable to attack people for their free speech. These people exist on both sides, I see examples of unhinged lefties and righties attacking the other side though they seem to be a little more common on the left.
Please point some police body cam videos that show a Trump supporter, Republican, or conservative who was arrested for breaking the law in order to express their political hatred of the opposing parties.
You never see videos of someone running into a yard to steal campaign signs for Harris, Obama, Clinton, or any other democrat.
You never see videos of someone demanding a restaurant patron remove an article of clothing supporting Democrats.
Is it your belief that those on the Right never get recorded breaking the law? That's why the number of Liberals gone wild on video make up the vast majority on YT?
I found where a Florida man (go figure) was supposedly a Trump supporter and was arrested for threatening voters at a polling place with a machete. That's not the same, since he went full crazy well beyond doing this in a nonpolitical setting. More of a targeted attack than a spontaneous loss of ones mind.
Most others I found were about a protest where an ANTIFA type started a fight with a Trump supporter, and they both got arrested. Again, this was not in an apolitical setting nor an impromptu attack.
Then there's the dentist who sent threats to 100 people for not loving Trump enough. Still, not an attack on anyone in public. Plus, we know how tightly wound some dentists are. It's not much of a surprise.
MAGA Dentist jailed for sending 100 rape and murder
threats to people for not loving Trump enough
https://boingboing.net/2025/03/06/maga-dentist-jailed-for-sending-100-rape-and-murder-threats-to-people-for-not-loving-trump-enough.html
-
Please point some police body cam videos that show a Trump supporter, Republican, or conservative who was arrested for breaking the law in order to express their political hatred of the opposing parties.
I have seen multiple videos of people on the right engaging in violence to stop someone on the left from burning a US flag.
Took me a minute but I found a specific example that you requested.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqwMptIF0pw
You never see videos of someone running into a yard to steal campaign signs for Harris, Obama, Clinton, or any other democrat.
Maybe you just don't look for them? Took me 30 seconds to find this one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjDm9GTFcuo
You never see videos of someone demanding a restaurant patron remove an article of clothing supporting Democrats.
Not really the same thing, I am talking about violence and aggression. A restaurant owner can set a dress code if they want.
Is it your belief that those on the Right never get recorded breaking the law? That's why the number of Liberals gone wild on video make up the vast majority on YT?
I think people find and get fed the videos that get more attention to them. The video of a Trump sign vandalized gets more attention from you than the video of a Biden sign getting vandalized. It also sticks with you more since it is happening to your side.
-
I have seen multiple videos of people on the right engaging in violence to stop someone on the left from burning a US flag.
Took me a minute but I found a specific example that you requested.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqwMptIF0pw
Maybe you just don't look for them? Took me 30 seconds to find this one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjDm9GTFcuo
Not really the same thing, I am talking about violence and aggression. A restaurant owner can set a dress code if they want.
I think people find and get fed the videos that get more attention to them. The video of a Trump sign vandalized gets more attention from you than the video of a Biden sign getting vandalized. It also sticks with you more since it is happening to your side.
The videos i usually see are where the sign thieves or vandals are caught and identified as leftist/anti-right political idiots. I've seen them get shocked, destroy their vehicles while running over signs, and videoed and identified as left-wing supporters, often just a neighbor jogging or walking the dog.
As the video you posted admitted, this last presidential election was highly unusual for so many democrat signs to be stolen or destroyed. Let that sink in first -- not a "happens on both sides" comment at all. Second, you have to consider whether democrats are also destroying democrat signs, not just republicans doing it. Biden was a horrible choice for reelection. Then, when Harris took his place, all those who supported Biden had to honestly come to grips with how bad their party really is. I can see many of them disillusioned to the point of taking/trashing signs for Harris (including Biden/Harris signs that were sill up).
As the lady said, and as I said, these videos are mostly vandalizing of Republican signs. And the videos you posted don't prove otherwise. The BLM video is a one-off, someone who wanted clicks on YT. Otherwise, s/he would not have been so overt about it. Going after a BLM road painting is no where near the same as attacking a stranger over their apparel or stealing signs for a political party. BLM is not a political party -- they are a gang of scammers who fleeced supporters out of millions to spend on themselves.
As for someone attacking someone in a restaurant for wearing Trump apparal, WTF? A dress code? That's go nothing to do with it. Lame.
-
Never wear a MAGA hat to a colonoscopy.
Unless you like free stuff. I heard dentist will give a free prostate exam if you wear a MAGA hat.
-
I have seen multiple videos of people on the right engaging in violence to stop someone on the left from burning a US flag.
How do you know they aren't trying to prevent a fire code violation or prevent a brush fire? We've seen what brush fires can do.
-
Unless you like free stuff. I heard dentist will give a free prostate exam if you wear a MAGA hat.
Don’t know the way into, or out of, the way to riff on this, save to say it is one crazy work of art!
-
heads
Unless you like free stuff. I heard dentist will give a free prostate exam if you wear a MAGA hat.
-
There are always going to be a certain percentage of people who either can't control their emotions or think it acceptable to attack people for their free speech. These people exist on both sides, I see examples of unhinged lefties and righties attacking the other side though they seem to be a little more common on the left.
I dunno dude.
Lefty protests are characterized by chip outs, property damage, looting, arson, and targeted violence against Americans - and they like doing this so much they plan them out like the Kailua Christmas Parade.
Righty protests are rare, and characterized by policing the area afterwards like cub scouts. You have to try to do something like force inject them with some unknown substance though, before they get pissed off enough to do one.
If you are inclined to maintain the same-same argument here, I urge you to wait until AFTER the next installment of lefty protests scheduled for 10/18, for which they are escalating from “No Kings” (I guess they have an issue with the Brits >:D), to “No Dictators” (Kim Jong Un?).
They will probably make the argument, well, let’s just say, less persuasive for you.
-
I dunno dude.
Lefty protests are characterized by chip outs, property damage, looting, arson, and targeted violence against Americans - and they like doing this so much they plan them out like the Kailua Christmas Parade.
Righty protests are rare, and characterized by policing the area afterwards like cub scouts. You have to try to do something like force inject them with some unknown substance though, before they get pissed off enough to do one.
If you are inclined to maintain the same-same argument here, I urge you to wait until AFTER the next installment of lefty protests scheduled for 10/18, for which they are escalating from “No Kings” (I guess the have an issue with the Brits >:D), to “No Dictators” (Kim Jong Un?).
They will probably make the argument, well, let’s just say, less persuasive for you.
Fresh facts will have no more effect on his opinions than preexisting facts.
Once he's got his mind made up, you might as well sign up a pig for singing lessons.
I wish i was wrong, but years of trying has resulted in countless wasted hours and one pissed off pig!
-
The videos i usually see are where the sign thieves or vandals are caught and identified as leftist/anti-right political idiots. I've seen them get shocked, destroy their vehicles while running over signs, and videoed and identified as left-wing supporters, often just a neighbor jogging or walking the dog.
As the video you posted admitted, this last presidential election was highly unusual for so many democrat signs to be stolen or destroyed. Let that sink in first -- not a "happens on both sides" comment at all. Second, you have to consider whether democrats are also destroying democrat signs, not just republicans doing it. Biden was a horrible choice for reelection. Then, when Harris took his place, all those who supported Biden had to honestly come to grips with how bad their party really is. I can see many of them disillusioned to the point of taking/trashing signs for Harris (including Biden/Harris signs that were sill up).
As the lady said, and as I said, these videos are mostly vandalizing of Republican signs. And the videos you posted don't prove otherwise. The BLM video is a one-off, someone who wanted clicks on YT. Otherwise, s/he would not have been so overt about it. Going after a BLM road painting is no where near the same as attacking a stranger over their apparel or stealing signs for a political party. BLM is not a political party -- they are a gang of scammers who fleeced supporters out of millions to spend on themselves.
As for someone attacking someone in a restaurant for wearing Trump apparal, WTF? A dress code? That's go nothing to do with it. Lame.
I have seen many of the videos you speak of as well, often very entertaining. Of course you recognize the problem of trying to base a statistical position based on how many videos we see, with a conservative bent we see more conservative material. There may indeed be more unhinged people on the left but what videos we get fed can distort our understanding of reality.
You say that we have to consider that democrats might be destroying their own signs. While I never discount that possibility, I never see people who point that out as a possibility apply it to republican signs being destroyed. Whether a disagreement within the party or even false flag incidents, that suggestion cuts both ways.
You said we "never see" to which I posted examples and now you are trying to say that it doesn't count because this or that. Don't move the goalposts, it isn't that hard to recognize that there are some unhinged people on the right as well. I can go look for videos of righties attacking lefties who are burning the US flag if you don't believe they ever engage in violence against speech they don't like.
-
I dunno dude.
Lefty protests are characterized by chip outs, property damage, looting, arson, and targeted violence against Americans - and they like doing this so much they plan them out like the Kailua Christmas Parade.
Righty protests are rare, and characterized by policing the area afterwards like cub scouts. You have to try to do something like force inject them with some unknown substance though, before they get pissed off enough to do one.
If you are inclined to maintain the same-same argument here, I urge you to wait until AFTER the next installment of lefty protests scheduled for 10/18, for which they are escalating from “No Kings” (I guess the have an issue with the Brits >:D), to “No Dictators” (Kim Jong Un?).
They will probably make the argument, well, let’s just say, less persuasive for you.
Chip outs?
Understand that I am not saying that the left and the right engage in these behaviors at the same rates, I think there is ample evidence to argue it happens more on the left, but my point was that the right is not immune to this kind of behavior.
-
I have seen many of the videos you speak of as well, often very entertaining. Of course you recognize the problem of trying to base a statistical position based on how many videos we see, with a conservative bent we see more conservative material. There may indeed be more unhinged people on the left but what videos we get fed can distort our understanding of reality.
You say that we have to consider that democrats might be destroying their own signs. While I never discount that possibility, I never see people who point that out as a possibility apply it to republican signs being destroyed. Whether a disagreement within the party or even false flag incidents, that suggestion cuts both ways.
You said we "never see" to which I posted examples and now you are trying to say that it doesn't count because this or that. Don't move the goalposts, it isn't that hard to recognize that there are some unhinged people on the right as well. I can go look for videos of righties attacking lefties who are burning the US flag if you don't believe they ever engage in violence against speech they don't like.
What goal posts? I gave specific types of videos related to the OP video -- woman attacking a stranger in public for no other reason than his MAGA hat. Period. don't accuse me of moving goals when you posted evidence that was way out of bounds.
Burning ones own flag is not an attack on a specific individual over their attire. They are not running up to a family in the park who are wearing MAGA hats and burning flags in front of them.
You must be really soar after all that stretching -- trying to make your examples fit my topic.
-
Fresh facts will have no more effect on his opinions than preexisting facts.
Once he's got his mind made up, you might as well sign up a pig for singing lessons.
I wish i was wrong, but years of trying has resulted in countless wasted hours and one pissed off pig!
Yah - maybe he doesn’t realize that if we are really so far off the rails reality-wise, we’d consider it a service to be truly corrected. If you’re factually wrong, then you’re wrong - carrying on in a deluded manner on planet Earth, in some spheres of activity, can be very costly…
If we aren’t then we aren’t.
-
Chip outs?
Understand that I am not saying that the left and the right engage in these behaviors at the same rates, I think there is ample evidence to argue it happens more on the left, but my point was that the right is not immune to this kind of behavior.
We’ll wait a sec. Has there EVER (not counting the Boston Tea Party) been an organized national protest by Righties against the Democrat party - because that’s what these are - political protests against the 77 million or so of us who voted for the restoration of immigration laws, etc.?
-
Chip outs?
Understand that I am not saying that the left and the right engage in these behaviors at the same rates, I think there is ample evidence to argue it happens more on the left, but my point was that the right is not immune to this kind of behavior.
You're hijacking another thread. The topic is not which political faction is more insane than the other.
The question sitting right in front of you every time you post here says in the title:
TDS is real. Were these people already insane, or did the Left cause this?
Focus, and quit moving the goal posts by ignoring the topic as presented.
Did you bother to view the video start to finish, or did you look at the preview and figure you know everything about it just from that?
-
I apologize to all chimps on the forum for the aforementioned association to Lefty flying butt-monkey rioters.
-
I apologize to all chimps on the forum for the aforementioned association to Lefty flying butt-monkey rioters.
Rule #6: Never say you're sorry. It's a sign of weakness.
-- NCIS Special Agent Leroy Jethro Gibbs
:geekdanc: :thumbsup: :shaka:
-
Rule #6: Never say you're sorry. It's a sign of weakness.
-- NCIS Special Agent Leroy Jethro Gibbs
:geekdanc: :thumbsup: :shaka:
I’m married to a 100 lb filipina who’s far more dangerous than I am….
Sometimes it just comes out of me like that.
-
I’m married to a 100 lb filipina who’s far more dangerous than I am….
Sometimes it just comes out of me like that.
Smart man.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
-
I’m married to a 100 lb filipina who’s far more dangerous than I am….
Sometimes it just comes out of me like that.
Gibbs' Rules were created to teach new NCIS agents how to be the kind of team members Gibbs wants them to become.
Nearly all the rules were meant to guide you in your professional interactions, not your personal relationships.
-
Gibbs' Rules were created to teach new NCIS agents how to be the kind of team members Gibbs wants them to become.
Nearly all the rules were meant to guide you in your professional interactions, not your personal relationships.
Yes, some are great!
I especially like Rule #7: Always be specific when you lie.
I use that with my wife when straight up apologizing may be too risky.
-
What goal posts? I gave specific types of videos related to the OP video -- woman attacking a stranger in public for no other reason than his MAGA hat. Period. don't accuse me of moving goals when you posted evidence that was way out of bounds.
Burning ones own flag is not an attack on a specific individual over their attire. They are not running up to a family in the park who are wearing MAGA hats and burning flags in front of them.
You must be really soar after all that stretching -- trying to make your examples fit my topic.
You asked for
"Please point some police body cam videos that show a Trump supporter, Republican, or conservative who was arrested for breaking the law in order to express their political hatred of the opposing parties."
You also asked about people damaging yard signs. I gave you videos of both but you tried to discount them as not counting by adding on additional criteria to what videos you wanted. Now you want it specifically along the lines of a MAGA hat type incident.
If you want actual assault incidents instead of just damaged signs I found a few examples.
Trump supporter attacks Trump protester
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBOhdwEJG-o
Another trump supporter punching a Trump protester, this one at a rally. The suspect stated on video "next time they may have to kill him" (the protester)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIjGzh_XFjY
This one has a few more examples
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZPUW3B6h6g of lesser things like spitting and shoving.
-
We’ll wait a sec. Has there EVER (not counting the Boston Tea Party) been an organized national protest by Righties against the Democrat party - because that’s what these are - political protests against the 77 million or so of us who voted for the restoration of immigration laws, etc.?
Assuming your premise of a mass scale organization is accurate, what does it matter whether there is organized national protest by the right against the left? It doesn't prove anything, it doesn't make the protest more or less just. If the NRA organized 10 million gun owners to protest democrat anti-gun laws would you have a similar objection to that?
-
You're hijacking another thread.
Wrong
The topic is not which political faction is more insane than the other.
Which is why that was not the point of my reply.
The question sitting right in front of you every time you post here says in the title:
TDS is real. Were these people already insane, or did the Left cause this?
If you think you can understand political violence by looking at only one sides behavior then you will never understand the explanation for this type of behavior, you are just engaging in confirmation bias.
-
You asked for
"Please point some police body cam videos that show a Trump supporter, Republican, or conservative who was arrested for breaking the law in order to express their political hatred of the opposing parties."
You also asked about people damaging yard signs. I gave you videos of both but you tried to discount them as not counting by adding on additional criteria to what videos you wanted. Now you want it specifically along the lines of a MAGA hat type incident.
If you want actual assault incidents instead of just damaged signs I found a few examples.
Trump supporter attacks Trump protester
Another trump supporter punching a Trump protester, this one at a rally. The suspect stated on video "next time they may have to kill him" (the protester)
This one has a few more examples
You are so blind.
i'm asking for evidence of someone in public being attacked, not a liberal nut-bag creating a disturbance at a Trump rally. In that instance, the liberal started the altercation by disrupting the event. So, if he gets assaulted by a random someone, it's not because the man was a Liberal wearing a Biden hat. It's because he's an idiot interfering in a rally that most people stood in line for hours to attend.
A campaign rally is political by definition. I would expect politics to be the motivating factor when someone does something wrong there.
That's not the same as being in a restaurant or at a park minding your own business, engaging in zero political activities, and being attacked for wearing a hat or shirt.
Please focus. if you can't find anything like this, just say so. Stop posting video links that you think support some other similar topic that i didn't ask for.
-
Assuming your premise of a mass scale organization is accurate, what does it matter whether there is organized national protest by the right against the left? It doesn't prove anything, it doesn't make the protest more or less just. If the NRA organized 10 million gun owners to protest democrat anti-gun laws would you have a similar objection to that?
That never happened. You're avoiding the question entirely.
-
That never happened. You're avoiding the question entirely.
Swoosh
-
Wrong
Which is why that was not the point of my reply.
If you think you can understand political violence by looking at only one sides behavior then you will never understand the explanation for this type of behavior, you are just engaging in confirmation bias.
The topic is not about both sides. Unless you believe the Right is somehow driving the Left insane, my topic will remain focused on one side's insanity and whether it happened organically or as a result of the left's policies and political activities.
if you don't want to play, you can start your own thread. Stop trying to hijack mine. :stopjack:
-
Swoosh
So mature.
-
You are so blind.
i'm asking for evidence of someone in public being attacked, not a liberal nut-bag creating a disturbance at a Trump rally. In that instance, the liberal started the altercation by disrupting the event. So, if he gets assaulted by a random someone, it's not because the man was a Liberal wearing a Biden hat. It's because he's an idiot interfering in a rally that most people stood in line for hours to attend.
A campaign rally is political by definition. I would expect politics to be the motivating factor when someone does something wrong there.
That's not the same as being in a restaurant or at a park minding your own business, engaging in zero political activities, and being attacked for wearing a hat or shirt.
Please focus. if you can't find anything like this, just say so. Stop posting video links that you think support some other similar topic that i didn't ask for.
The first video was someone being attacked in public, it was a protester outside a Trump rally, on the sidewalk, not even inside. Did you even watch it, beginning to end?
Regardless, why does it matter if the Trump protester is attacked within a rally? Is it legal to punch someone in a rally for holding an opposing sign but not on the sidewalk. More goalpost moving trying to find a distinction without a difference. Whether being punched for wearing a MAGA hat on the sidewalk or someone criticizing Trump inside a Trump rally, those are both examples of unhinged people unable to control their emotions or who feel they can justify violence against someone they disagree with politically.
-
The topic is not about both sides. Unless you believe the Right is somehow driving the Left insane, my topic will remain focused on one side's insanity and whether it happened organically or as a result of the left's policies and political activities.
if you don't want to play, you can start your own thread. Stop trying to hijack mine. :stopjack:
The same psychological and sociological things that lead to unhinged TDS individuals is at play in understanding unhinged MAGA individuals. It isn't something to understand from only one side.
As to the specific question in the title, I agree with quiet, maybe a little bit of both.
-
The first video was someone being attacked in public, it was a protester outside a Trump rally, on the sidewalk, not even inside. Did you even watch it, beginning to end?
Regardless, why does it matter if the Trump protester is attacked within a rally? Is it legal to punch someone in a rally for holding an opposing sign but not on the sidewalk. More goalpost moving trying to find a distinction without a difference. Whether being punched for wearing a MAGA hat on the sidewalk or someone criticizing Trump inside a Trump rally, those are both examples of unhinged people unable to control their emotions or who feel they can justify violence against someone they disagree with politically.
OMG. You are desperate. It was at a rally, but it wasn't inside? That's your big example of "being in public?" Is it your belief he was attacked while minding his own business and simply wearing political attire someone disagreed with? You're wasting my time. I already knew the answer before you started posting videos that don't meet the criteria I asked for.
You asking why does it matter tells me you can't comprehend English (something I've accused you of many times, because it's true).
it matters because only the left will attack someone minding their own business and engaging in no political rallies or protests for no reason other than wearing a MAGA hat or Trump shirt. The Right never does that. Facts matter.
You're trying to argue that leftists get attacked in public even though they are at protests or rallies that are political. There's not a single Trump supporter who saw that leftist walking his dog down the sidewalk and attacked him for simply wearing a Harris T-Shirt.
if you refuse to see the difference, then you're beyond reasoning with.
I still have some free singing lessons available, but I'm seriously considering closing my studio. One pig takes up time that could be spent with a dozen people.
-
OMG. You are desperate. It was at a rally, but it wasn't inside? That's your big example of "being in public?" Is it your belief he was attacked while minding his own business and simply wearing political attire someone disagreed with? You're wasting my time. I already knew the answer before you started posting videos that don't meet the criteria I asked for.
You asking why does it matter tells me you can't comprehend English (something I've accused you of many times, because it's true).
it matters because only the left will attack someone minding their own business and engaging in no political rallies or protests for no reason other than wearing a MAGA hat or Trump shirt. The Right never does that. Facts matter.
You're trying to argue that leftists get attacked in public even though they are at protests or rallies that are political. There's not a single Trump supporter who saw that leftist walking his dog down the sidewalk and attacked him for simply wearing a Harris T-Shirt.
if you refuse to see the difference, then you're beyond reasoning with.
I still have some free singing lessons available, but I'm seriously considering closing my studio. One pig takes up time that could be spent with a dozen people.
I am the one that is desperate? I posted 5-6 videos of republicans being violent and damaging property that you asked for and you end up justifying the actions or moving the goalpost.
A person who cannot control their emotion or justifies violence is a danger to society. It doesn't matter whether they are triggered by the sight of a MAGA hat or a protester holding a sign criticizing Trump yet you provide excuses when it comes to the violent Trump supporter. Why?
Found an example for you right about what you were asking, just a shirt, not a hat. At a women's rights march, a 17 year old struck a 65 year old who was wearing a Harris shirt and the two had not had any interaction or disagreement prior. Interested to see how you move the goalposts on this one... maybe because he was 17 that doesn't count, you meant only adults?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/11/04/teen-trump-shirt-punch-harris-supporter-stuart-florida-political-violence/76049152007/
-
I am the one that is desperate? I posted 5-6 videos of republicans being violent and damaging property that you asked for and you end up justifying the actions or moving the goalpost.
A person who cannot control their emotion or justifies violence is a danger to society. It doesn't matter whether they are triggered by the sight of a MAGA hat or a protester holding a sign criticizing Trump yet you provide excuses when it comes to the violent Trump supporter. Why?
Attempted goal post relocation rejected.
-
Attempted goal post relocation rejected.
You make distinctions without a difference. Not sure why it is ok to strike someone outside a rally but not just wearing a MAGA hat walking down the sidewalk.
Found an example for you right about what you were asking, just a shirt, not a hat. At a women's rights march, a 17 year old struck a 65 year old who was wearing a Harris shirt and the two had not had any interaction or disagreement prior. Interested to see how you move the goalposts on this one... maybe because he was 17 that doesn't count, you meant only adults?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/11/04/teen-trump-shirt-punch-harris-supporter-stuart-florida-political-violence/76049152007/
-
At some point we are going to need to see some permits for all the goal post relocations
-
At some point we are going to need to see some permits for all the goal post relocations
HIFICO could raise funds.....
-
You make distinctions without a difference. Not sure why it is ok to strike someone outside a rally but not just wearing a MAGA hat walking down the sidewalk.
Found an example for you right about what you were asking, just a shirt, not a hat. At a women's rights march, a 17 year old struck a 65 year old who was wearing a Harris shirt and the two had not had any interaction or disagreement prior. Interested to see how you move the goalposts on this one... maybe because he was 17 that doesn't count, you meant only adults?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/11/04/teen-trump-shirt-punch-harris-supporter-stuart-florida-political-violence/76049152007/
When did i ever say this: "...it is ok to strike someone outside a rally..."
Did you get a chance to call an English tutor? It could save us all a lot of time and angst.
-
Assuming your premise of a mass scale organization is accurate, what does it matter whether there is organized national protest by the right against the left? It doesn't prove anything, it doesn't make the protest more or less just. If the NRA organized 10 million gun owners to protest democrat anti-gun laws would you have a similar objection to that?
Hey send us a selfie from your nationally organized, billionaire funded, anti-American Pro-Communist Democrat protest tomorrow!
P.S. Don’t get all habut if we mess around with everyone’s pronouns in the shot - can’t help it.
And don’t forget the sponsors…
(https://static1.squarespace.com/static/68d3fff7a872a70ec39a9fa0/t/68ec0ac1c194b019e9740885/1760299713694/1018+Logos+On+1012.png)
-
bra itz called " NO DIKTACTERS" day out fo respeckt for da King Kamehameha ova hea in Hawaii.
https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2025/10/18/no-dictators-protests-take-place-across-islands-mainland/
-
bra itz called " NO DIKTACTERS" day out fo respeckt for da King Kamehameha ova hea in Hawaii.
https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2025/10/18/no-dictators-protests-take-place-across-islands-mainland/
No dictators instead of "NO KINGS" out of respect............... :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
-
No dictators instead of "NO KINGS" out of respect............... :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
What vermin assholes: when you see the images of these things protesting dictators in Hawaii, just know that every one of them just celebrated this dictatorship:
“The Navahine settlement is a landmark agreement in which the state of Hawaiʻi committed to decarbonizing its transportation system in response to a lawsuit filed by thirteen youth plaintiffs. This case, recognized as the world's first youth-led constitutional climate case, affirms the right to a clean and healthful environment and requires the state to develop a comprehensive greenhouse gas reduction plan by May 2025.”
No, these are all confirmed gimps who crave serfdom, who live to lick the bottom of the boots of their apparatchik masters, who in turn serve their globalist lords.
Take a good look, as you will steadily see less and less of them as natural selection works its magic.
The perpetuation of crime and tyranny is the hill they’ve chosen to die on in these protests - I say Godspeed to them :thumbsup:
-
What vermin assholes: when you see the images of these things protesting dictators in Hawaii, just know that every one of them just celebrated this dictatorship:
“The Navahine settlement is a landmark agreement in which the state of Hawaiʻi committed to decarbonizing its transportation system in response to a lawsuit filed by thirteen youth plaintiffs. This case, recognized as the world's first youth-led constitutional climate case, affirms the right to a clean and healthful environment and requires the state to develop a comprehensive greenhouse gas reduction plan by May 2025.”
No, these are all confirmed gimps who crave serfdom, who live to lick the bottom of the boots of their apparatchik masters, who in turn serve their globalist lords.
Take a good look, as you will steadily see less and less of them as natural selection works its magic.
The perpetuation of crime and tyranny is the hill they’ve chosen to die on in these protests - I say Godspeed to them :thumbsup:
(https://blog.polynesia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/The-Battle-of-Nuuanu-Pali-Lookout-232264_1080x675.jpg)
-
Typical protester on the way to the Capitol today
(https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi2-prod.dailystar.co.uk%2Fincoming%2Farticle21902817.ece%2FALTERNATES%2Fs615b%2F1_EN-TESCO-GIMP-04.jpg&f=1&ipt=32f9d3b5af64557b9aa59c9a2a068aa799a38223389517c94eb45d568a4f2aca)
-
(https://blog.polynesia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/The-Battle-of-Nuuanu-Pali-Lookout-232264_1080x675.jpg)
Nice
Very nice
-
No Kings
Meanwhile Alex Soros be like…
(https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTZjMDliOTUyemRuNWFnbTc3NzFsc3c0cml1M285a3JqNXNpajBnZWQwbTBhczM1dyZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/6iQuTJ3Ch1jWw/giphy.gif)
-
Only in America where we can ELECT a dictator....
-
Typical protester on the way to the Capitol today
(https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi2-prod.dailystar.co.uk%2Fincoming%2Farticle21902817.ece%2FALTERNATES%2Fs615b%2F1_EN-TESCO-GIMP-04.jpg&f=1&ipt=32f9d3b5af64557b9aa59c9a2a068aa799a38223389517c94eb45d568a4f2aca)
Fake news. Photo is from the UK taken in April 2020.
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/gimp-man-spotted-shopping-essentials-21902814
-
joe biden did not become a full blown dictator. Although he clearly aspired to be.
He was halfway to getting there as a dick.......then faltered and slinked slowly away into the swamp.
-
Fake news. Photo is from the UK taken in April 2020.
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/gimp-man-spotted-shopping-essentials-21902814
It’s called humor.
They are ALL gimps to me.
-
Only in America where we can ELECT a dictator....
Razor sharp point there!
However, if by some fluke one of them should grasp it, their head would explode.
-
joe biden did not become a full blown dictator. Although he clearly aspired to be.
He was halfway to getting there as a dick.......then faltered and slinked slowly away into the swamp.
Biden was in government too, too long -- half a century!
That career gave him the arrogance and confidence to pretty much do whatever he wanted. That's why so many of his orders were dragged into court with him losing most of them. He didn't care, because it demonstrated to his cult members that he was trying to give them what they wanted.
He's a political animal, not so much a dictator. He was the head of a crime family that benefitted from his government positions and contacts. i could list half a dozen ways he and the family benefitted with just Hunter's corrupt dealings overseas, but they've been covered many times here.
i think he's more like Al Capone or Vito Corleone. He's in it to get rich and maintain his and his family's life style. Being the supreme leader was just a means to an end that didn't involve actually ruling. Power comes in many forms, and for someone who's never had a real job, it often means wealth and financial independence.
-
they just made it...
https://www.kitv.com/news/local/common-kings-official-kick-off-for-oahus-first-holo-holo-music-festival/article_8ee988e7-c406-413a-a8e1-b626d917df06.html
-
Uh oh. Looks like someone ran out of NGO money.
We could be watching the Democrat party fizzle in front of our very eyes.
https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2025/10/18/no-dictators-protests-take-place-across-islands-mainland/
-
Uh oh. Looks like someone ran out of NGO money.
We could be watching the Democrat party fizzle in front of our very eyes.
https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2025/10/18/no-dictators-protests-take-place-across-islands-mainland/
Mari Matsuda, a retired law professor and lawyer, said, “For 40 years,
I taught students about the Constitution and Bill of Rights and our
obligation as citizens to support the rule of law, and everything that I
taught them is now being violated by our own government.”
Attendee Joseph Pugh said, “It’s not a Democrat, Republican thing, it’s
about people. It’s about protecting people. I’m here specifically about
ICE and all the ICE raids that I’ve seen.”
Really? I wonder if Joseph ever took mari's classes on the Constitution?
The constItution Mari taught mandates that the federal government
protect the states -- i.e. the entire nation -- against foreign invasion. That
means having the responsibility of controlling the borders, managing
immigration, and deporting foreigners who enter or remain in the country
illegally. In fact, every state or city that establishes a "sanctuary" for illegal
aliens and/or tries to interfere by not notifying ICE of illegal detainees or
by not providing local law enforcement support and assistance is committing
a crime against the Constitution by obstructing the federal government's
efforts to protect them.
i think Liberal states have gotten so used to the feds washing their hands of
protecting against illegals that they've grown used to all the accommodations
and social welfare programs established to help them that any attempt to
disrupt their system of enabling illegal immigration seems like government
overreach to them. It's the exact opposite. Trump is not kicking the can further
down the road. He's fixing the problem.
Article 4 Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states: The United States shall
guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government,
and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the
legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened)
against domestic violence.
This was to guarantee that each state of the union was protected against
invasion by foreign nations, revolutionary forces, drug cartels and
uncontrolled (illegal) immigration. If we cannot control our borders we
cannot defend our national sovereignty…..it's that simple.
https://danhappel.com/article-4-section-4-protecting-our-borders-under-the-u-s-constitution/
-
Well, in looking at the aftermath on local news, it appears that the Dems made a strategic blunder in holding their gay parade on the same day, and we got the answer to an interesting question about them:
Do Dems like dildos more than protesting imaginary dictators?
Hell yes!
My theory that they are all gimps has passed an important experimental milestone!
-
It’s called humor.
They are ALL gimps to me.
Right.
Ha ha.
:geekdanc:
As long you're entertained, carry on.
-
Right.
Ha ha.
:geekdanc:
As long you're entertained, carry on.
No worry - not immediately planning to start a separate
“Maybe Not all Dems are Gimps, but ALL Gimps ARE Dems”
thread - but if I do I’ll put it in its proper place under Off Topic. :shaka:
-
Here's another violent Leftist who resorted to vandalism and firing shots at a home just for having a sign on his property supporting MAGA and Trump.
I can only assume he attended a No Kings protest over the weekend, possibly in DC, and was driving back home. His home is 160 miles away from the site of the vandalism.
He's an accountant, so maybe he thought the Ben Affleck movies are instruction videos.
:wacko: :crazy: :shake:
https://youtu.be/KOhiVYtIIu8
-
Saw many signs from the "no kings" protest across the nation. #facepalm to majority of them. I never understood how dumb people can be until 2016 to now.
-
Once the Dems have completely run out of relevancy we still have some huge problems ahead of us.
But it will be nice to not have to worry about gay communism any longer.
-
This is amazing. All those protestors lived! No mass incarcerations. They have no fear of a "king" coming after them! Awesome weekend to protest in America against an elected 'king'!
-
This is amazing. All those protestors lived! No mass incarcerations. They have no fear of a "king" coming after them! Awesome weekend to protest in America against an elected 'king'!
Or their protest worked.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
-
Once the Dems have completely run out of relevancy we still have some huge problems ahead of us.
But it will be nice to not have to worry about gay communism any longer.
Diversity is their strength, he he
-
When did i ever say this: "...it is ok to strike someone outside a rally..."
Did you get a chance to call an English tutor? It could save us all a lot of time and angst.
I asked the question because you dismissed political violence when it wasn't in your specific narrow scenario.
-
I asked the question because you dismissed political violence when it wasn't in your specific narrow scenario.
Show me where i did dismissed political violence when it wasn't in your specific narrow scenario. i'm trying to get you to understand the TOPIC, but you want to whataboutism me to death.
i assume i'll get the same nonresponse as i did to my last request.
:wacko:
-
Show me where i did dismissed political violence when it wasn't in your specific narrow scenario. i'm trying to get you to understand the TOPIC, but you want to whataboutism me to death.
i assume i'll get the same nonresponse as i did to my last request.
:wacko:
I gave you multiple examples of violence by the right against the left and you dismissed them because they happened at a rally. Why does it matter that the political violence was at a rally or not? If it didn't matter then you wouldn't have brought it up.
-
I gave you multiple examples of violence by the right against the left and you dismissed them because they happened at a rally. Why does it matter that the political violence was at a rally or not? If it didn't matter then you wouldn't have brought it up.
I asked for examples within the SAME ENVIRONMENT/SETTING/CIRCUMSTANCES as the story I posted --
i.e. "Another example of the crazy antics from a Trump hater who attacked a man wearing a MAGA hat."
If you can't, you can't.
In school, did you get full credit for putting anything you felt like on paper whether or not it answered the question asked?
That would explain everything.
-
I asked for examples within the SAME ENVIRONMENT/SETTING/CIRCUMSTANCES as the story I posted --
i.e. "Another example of the crazy antics from a Trump hater who attacked a man wearing a MAGA hat."
If you can't, you can't.
In school, did you get full credit for putting anything you felt like on paper whether or not it answered the question asked?
That would explain everything.
Why does it have to be the same exact scenario, why can't you just admit there are crazy people on the right who engage in political violence too? Go read my initial reply in this thread, I never said anything about specific circumstances, I only argued that there was political violence on both sides and I provided videos when asked about it. Your only real rebuttal is a whataboutism basis that minimizes political violence if it doesn't occur within some set scenario you demand. Whether at a protest or just walking down the street, someone who attacks another because they are wearing the hat of an opponent is an unhinged emotional violent person.
-
Why does it have to be the same exact scenario, why can't you just admit there are crazy people on the right who engage in political violence too? Go read my initial reply in this thread, I never said anything about specific circumstances, I only argued that there was political violence on both sides and I provided videos when asked about it. Your only real rebuttal is a whataboutism basis that minimizes political violence if it doesn't occur within some set scenario you demand. Whether at a protest or just walking down the street, someone who attacks another because they are wearing the hat of an opponent is an unhinged emotional violent person.
You don't get to hijack my thread and change the question to suit your political bias.
Just stop.
:stopjack:
-
You don't get to hijack my thread and change the question to suit your political bias.
Just stop.
:stopjack:
Showing that both sides have violent members = "hijacking" your thread?
Didn't realize you needed a safe space for your discussions.
-
Showing that both sides have violent members = "hijacking" your thread?
Didn't realize you needed a safe space for your discussions.
When you won't answer the original question I asked, then YES -- hijacking for your own narrative.
-
Why does it have to be the same exact scenario
It limits goalpost moving.
-
When you won't answer the original question I asked, then YES -- hijacking for your own narrative.
Incorrect, it did answer your question.
You asked:
"Were these people already insane, or did the Left cause this?"
My answer was that there are always people like this and on both sides. In other words people were already that insane.
You just didn't like it being pointed out that this isn't only a problem of the left.
-
Incorrect, it did answer your question.
You asked:
"Were these people already insane, or did the Left cause this?"
My answer was that there are always people like this and on both sides. In other words people were already that insane.
You just didn't like it being pointed out that this isn't only a problem of the left.
I asked you to answer A or B, and you chose C.
You could have easily chosen A, but you waited until now to do so. After answering, you could have then posted about both sides. But you can't play nice. Always trying to be difficult..
"My answer was that there are always people like this and on both sides."
That doesn't answer the question. Were they already insane before the party drove them insane? or only after they became part of the Left?
Then you tried to clarify by saying, "In other words," which was about as close to you giving a straight answer as we could expect. If your answer was plain to start with, there would be no need to put it "in other words."
Just stop.
-
I asked you to answer A or B, and you chose C.
You could have easily chosen A, but you waited until now to do so. After answering, you could have then posted about both sides. But you can't play nice. Always trying to be difficult..
"My answer was that there are always people like this and on both sides."
That doesn't answer the question. Were they already insane before the party drove them insane? or only after they became part of the Left?
Then you tried to clarify by saying, "In other words," which was about as close to you giving a straight answer as we could expect. If your answer was plain to start with, there would be no need to put it "in other words."
Just stop.
Key word ALWAYS. The party didn't drive them insane, they always existed because insane people have always existed. Crazy people isn't a 12st century occurrence.
-
Liberals are twice as likely as conservatives to have poor mental health
https://nypost.com/2025/06/03/us-news/is-it-any-wonder-liberals-are-having-a-mental-health-crisis/
-
Liberals are twice as likely as conservatives to have poor mental health
https://nypost.com/2025/06/03/us-news/is-it-any-wonder-liberals-are-having-a-mental-health-crisis/
This goes back to my original question which EEF believes is not a recent phenomenon:
Were these people already insane, or did the Left cause this?
If already insane, then they gravitate toward the Democrat Party. If relatively sane before joining, then the Party must in some measure be the cause of the insanity.
Chicken and egg, or does this lend itself more to causation analysis?
True there have been crazy people throughout human history, but the POINT OF THIS THREAD is that more of the crazies have aligned themselves with the Left than the Right. So, my question is apropos. Did they start being unbalanced before or after they joined?
-
This goes back to my original question which EEF believes is not a recent phenomenon:
Were these people already insane, or did the Left cause this?
If already insane, then they gravitate toward the Democrat Party. If relatively sane before joining, then the Party must in some measure be the cause of the insanity.
Chicken and egg, or does this lend itself more to causation analysis?
Some certainly gravitate towards the democrat party. Others gravitate to the republican party. Democrats have a few more I would argue though.
-
More direct evidence that TDS exists.
In this case, I think the mental illness existed before Trump's introduction to politics as is demonstrated by her appearance and words.
Now the TDS appears, giving her one more thing she is unhappy about besides her original ordinary human attributes.
Why else would a healthy-minded person put these videos online for the world to see?
https://youtu.be/qfWg428W8hE
-
1 in 6 Americans is on psychiatric drugs and it shows
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/HkgM4stm/Justsayno.png) (https://postimages.org/)
-
Some certainly gravitate towards the democrat party. Others gravitate to the republican party. Democrats have a few more I would argue though.
You also left out:
Some gravitate toward the libertarian party
Some gravitate to no party
Some don't gravitate at all
Some gravitate to the CCP
Some gravitate to the NCR (New California Republic)
-
I want my ding-a-ling to gravitate too. But it's not cooperating. My ding-a-ling is converting to a democrat. All of them are soft like jell-o.
-
I want my ding-a-ling to gravitate too. But it's not cooperating. My ding-a-ling is converting to a democrat. All of them are soft like jell-o.
Bruh, if you got 2 ding-a-lings, you got more probelms to worry about that people with TDS.
-
There's 1 vid of the Sec of War benching 315 along his service members. The comments from even experienced lifters on social media are:
Fake cause the bar doesn't bend, because it should start to bend at 225.
fake cause there was no noise when he racked the weight.
Fake cause those are bumper plates, they're prob 25lbs and not 45lbs each.
From people who lift due to their social media pics, they should know better. The bar doesn't bend at 225 and even at 315 most of the time. And I rack my bar without the need to slam it and make noise. And the black bumper plates, 45lbs is about that thick. 25lb bumpers would be half of that or so in thickness.
So this goes to show that even logic excapes those with TDS who have XP lifting.
Then there's the non lifter commenting:
He's too old to be able to bench 315
He's too tall to be able to bench 315
His form sucked
None above are true.
Then he did it again from what looks like in his garage with his son. The weights were different ant the regular non-bumper plates. No bar bend, no lound noise when re racking.
Thought I'd share this about TDS, but in a different non-discussed aspect.
-
There's 1 vid of the Sec of War benching 315 along his service members. The comments from even experienced lifters on social media are:
Fake cause the bar doesn't bend, because it should start to bend at 225.
fake cause there was no noise when he racked the weight.
Fake cause those are bumper plates, they're prob 25lbs and not 45lbs each.
From people who lift due to their social media pics, they should know better. The bar doesn't bend at 225 and even at 315 most of the time. And I rack my bar without the need to slam it and make noise. And the black bumper plates, 45lbs is about that thick. 25lb bumpers would be half of that or so in thickness.
So this goes to show that even logic excapes those with TDS who have XP lifting.
Then there's the non lifter commenting:
He's too old to be able to bench 315
He's too tall to be able to bench 315
His form sucked
None above are true.
Then he did it again from what looks like in his garage with his son. The weights were different ant the regular non-bumper plates. No bar bend, no lound noise when re racking.
Thought I'd share this about TDS, but in a different non-discussed aspect.
The lies, congenital falsehood, and deception are their most distinguishing characteristic.
They get that from their father.
(https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%2Fid%2FOIP.kk3OSm3pM9s9rzad1dxJ0QHaIb%3Fpid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=514d48c3146e06b3276dbd608781414d109c0c36557e5aba87e97ffa5cf8b5c7&ipo=images)
-
The Truth is irrelevant.
Lies are the new truth.
Reality is irrelevant.
A.I. will be your new reality.
The meaning of existence is irrelevant.
Just exist and pay your damn taxes, you puke.
-
The Truth is irrelevant.
Lies are the new truth.
Reality is irrelevant.
A.I. will be your new reality.
The meaning of existence is irrelevant.
Just exist and pay your damn taxes, you puke.
Dude - you're takin all the mystery outa life here.
-
"the issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution"
-Saul Alinsky
-
"blackpink is the revolution"
-blinks
"the issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution"
-Saul Alinsky
-
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/2026504639416275354
see anyone familiar?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smrT1VvaOx0&themeRefresh=1
-
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/2026504639416275354
see anyone familiar?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smrT1VvaOx0&themeRefresh=1
Nice
Tar and feather them all.
Steel cable a wheel rim to each leg.
Drop from 10,000 feet directly over the Mariana Trench.
Return to a now sane, moral, and safe country.
Morning in America
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J2hs6tuuCA
-
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/2026504639416275354
see anyone familiar?
Jill with her face in her phone.
Nice work if you can get it.
-
I wasn't into politics prior to 2016. But when Barry gave his state of the union, did GOP members wear special clothing or hold up signs? And for all other POTUS too, did the opposite party do what they're doing with Trump?
-
I wasn't into politics prior to 2016. But when Barry gave his state of the union, did GOP members wear special clothing or hold up signs? And for all other POTUS too, did the opposite party do what they're doing with Trump?
All were asked to stand in support of American citizens and the Dems sat. It wasnt for the POTUS or admin but for the PEOPLE of the USA! Take note Hawaii sheeple
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrats-big-misfire-state-union-has-gop-strategists-salivating-huge-moment
-
Hawaii's Reps. and Senators didn't stand either so it seems.
I would think this is a bi-partisan stance. I guess not.
So yeah, hawaii's sheeple probably, due to their lack of critical thinking, is standing behind our illustrious congressional leaders.
-
Hawaii's Reps. and Senators didn't stand either so it seems.
I would think this is a bi-partisan stance. I guess not.
So yeah, hawaii's sheeple probably, due to their lack of critical thinking, is standing behind our illustrious congressional leaders.
The more I see of John "Hoodie" Fetterman, the more I respect him even with his Democrat Party viewpoints.
He stood at all the right places in Trump's address and may have been the only Dem Party member to shake the President's hand afterward.
Sad when our supposedly smart HI reps are less mature and more self-owning than a man who suffered an ischemic stroke with associated brain dysfunction.
https://www.jfeed.com/news/tb1t4k
-
The more I see of John "Hoodie" Fetterman, the more I respect him even with his Democrat Party viewpoints.
He stood at all the right places in Trump's address and may have been the only Dem Party member to shake the President's hand afterward.
Sad when our supposedly smart HI reps are less mature and self-owning than a man who suffered an ischemic stroke with associated brain dysfunction.
https://www.jfeed.com/news/tb1t4k
You’re absolutely right! - the people of Hawaii deserve representatives such as he, but The Party here will never permit such an individual the opportunity, and the people seemingly will never buck The Party.
-
I never thought I would say this, but we need more John Fettermans in the democrat party.
I thought he was looney tunes but in reality he's the only sensible democrat in congress.
-
I never thought I would say this, but we need more John Fettermans in the democrat party.
I thought he was looney tunes but in reality he's the only sensible democrat in congress.
Wouldn't that be John Fettermen?
Or maybe Johns Fetterman?
:geekdanc: :rofl:
-
I never thought I would say this, but we need more John Fettermans in the democrat party.
I thought he was looney tunes but in reality he's the only sensible democrat in congress.
When your typical DNC politicians are so crazy, that it makes unlce fester look sane.
-
When your typical DNC politicians are so crazy, that it makes unlce fester look sane.
Today’s Dems make Charlie Manson look like an all-together dude.
-
Good news
Make CNN Great Again
https://youtu.be/tf6dff6t7No
-
Somewhere in the video is Bozo Hirono all Ha-Buut. She's such an embarrassment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeuGoJ3efkc