2aHawaii
General Topics => Legal and Activism => Topic started by: Kingkeoni on July 13, 2013, 04:28:14 PM
-
What so you think the outcome should have been.
-
>:D
-
If Hawaii get ccw I be merken fools left and right I going aggravate them make them beat me up till I bleed and straight blast them fools . Ay sus shoot shoot shoot
-
If Hawaii get ccw I be merken fools left and right I going aggravate them make them beat me up till I bleed and straight blast them fools . Ay sus shoot shoot shoot
Bro you got issues. :wtf:
-
Yea bra I sick n I like to shoot guns shoot shoot shoot bastos
-
>:D
-
Bro you got issues. :wtf:
+ infinity
Yea bra I sick n I like to shoot guns shoot shoot shoot bastos
I dont think someone like yourself should be allowed anywhere near firearms. In fact, I think you should be TOS'd
-
http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/trayvon-martin-not-guilty-verdict-sparks-reaction-from-athletes-shaq-dwyane-wade-chris-paul-victor-cruz-071313 (http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/trayvon-martin-not-guilty-verdict-sparks-reaction-from-athletes-shaq-dwyane-wade-chris-paul-victor-cruz-071313)
i usually could care less what athletes or celebrities have to say but i must say reading some of their twitter comments is...interesting to say the least.
on a side note, 2a members ready for the potential race wars?? haha jk..sort of.
-
+ infinity
I dont think someone like yourself should be allowed anywhere near firearms. In fact, I think you should be TOS'd
i agree, and i hope hes not a firearm owner. although im 95% sure he is since hes a member here.
-
i agree, and i hope hes not a firearm owner. although im 95% sure he is since hes a member here.
Well, then if he is, Mr. Baker's suspicion of others at the range may be warranted. People of his/her character is not one I'd condone as a rational, responsible firearm owner. I hope this person is not as itchy with his trigger finger than his figurative mouth.
-
It is my opinion that we won't see any big rioting (at least not huge scale)...I personally think all that was said to try to sway the people from saying "Not Guilty". What I do believe is that I wasn't there when that incident happened and I wasn't there everyday during the trial, so I can't begin to formulate an accurate opinion of his guilt or innocence. Our judicial system is what it is, he was charged, he had his day in court. There was a prosecuting team, a defense team and a jury of his 12 peers. Evidence was submitted and the jurors came back with a "not guilty" verdict. No one is ever going to like the outcome of every trial, but it is the system we have, like it or not.
I will tell you that I am happy because now the gun grabbers can't start spouting off about CCW causing more "unnecessary" gun deaths. Good day for CCW everywhere.
-
well he only had a jury of 6 peers.. all women. from what I have watched I believe not guilty was the right verdict for this case. sadly though he will never live a normal life again. Really makes you think twice about defending yourself in todays world.
-
jury was 6 women
It is my opinion that we won't see any big rioting (at least not huge scale)...I personally think all that was said to try to sway the people from saying "Not Guilty". What I do believe is that I wasn't there when that incident happened and I wasn't there everyday during the trial, so I can't begin to formulate an accurate opinion of his guilt or innocence. Our judicial system is what it is, he was charged, he had his day in court. There was a prosecuting team, a defense team and a jury of his 12 peers. Evidence was submitted and the jurors came back with a "not guilty" verdict. No one is ever going to like the outcome of every trial, but it is the system we have, like it or not.
I will tell you that I am happy because now the gun grabbers can't start spouting off about CCW causing more "unnecessary" gun deaths. Good day for CCW everywhere.
-
I know...I was just generally talking about our judicial system. 12 or 6, either way, the system worked as it was supposed to. It did not let the media, or random threats of violence keep them from their task.
-
Now the NAACP is considering pursuing a civil case against him.
http://www.businessinsider.com/george-zimmerman-not-guilty-naacp-verdict-civil-rights-2013-7 (http://www.businessinsider.com/george-zimmerman-not-guilty-naacp-verdict-civil-rights-2013-7)
-
I watched commentary on MSNBC (I know I know, but gotta watch what the liberals are spouting) and FOX. Unbelievable the race baiting that is going on, seems like they trying to incite a riot. :(
-
Ok...who the hell approved this weirdo for the forum :wacko: :wtf:
weirdo is right.....dudes OFF!
-
Troll
-
>:D
-
The prosecution had no case. He shouldnt have been charged in the first place with the evidence that they had. They just wasted
Time and money, and irresponsibly put people in danger of possible riots and violence. They should have sqashed it in the first place up front, looking at the evedence stated. Now this guy is marked for life. It is no wonder its everyone for themselves these days. You cannot even protect yourself or your neighbourhood without fear of prosecution. Sad for real.
-
Now the NAACP is considering pursuing a civil case against him.
http://www.businessinsider.com/george-zimmerman-not-guilty-naacp-verdict-civil-rights-2013-7 (http://www.businessinsider.com/george-zimmerman-not-guilty-naacp-verdict-civil-rights-2013-7)
Doesn't Florida self defense law protect Zimmerman now that he's been found to have acted in lawful self-defense?
-
Doesn't Florida self defense law protect Zimmerman now that he's been found to have acted in lawful self-defense?
Yeah, I just quoted myself, because I'm about to answer my own question. Boom. That just happened! Lol. Anyway, they can't bring a civil suit against Zimmerman. I think the previous poster was confused, the NAACP is circulating a petition for the Justice Department to open a case against Zimmerman for civil rights violations. Basically, the new stated position of the NAACP is that reporting someone to the police is a violation of their civil rights. Hooyah, NAACP, I've always thought you guys were awesome! (Sarcasm. Heavy.)
-
>:D
-
They tend to do this whenever ANY person of African-American descent doesn't get what they feel is justice.
Wonder how 'racist' it would be if they formed the NWACP, who's sole purpose was to defend the interest of white people and ensure that they receive proper 'justice'.
Not sure you have the right definition of NAACP ... National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
I have found it ironic this organization keeps "Colored" in it's name when that term is considered derogatory to many.
-
>:D
-
:rofl:
And here I was thinking it was
National African American Coalition for Progress
Guess it would be
National Association for the Advancement of White Peoples
Just drop the P ...
National Assn for the Advancement of Caucasians!
:thumbsup:
-
Now the NAACP is considering pursuing a civil case against him.
http://www.businessinsider.com/george-zimmerman-not-guilty-naacp-verdict-civil-rights-2013-7 (http://www.businessinsider.com/george-zimmerman-not-guilty-naacp-verdict-civil-rights-2013-7)
on a Youtube chat I watched they discussed this. And the out come was that no one cannot sue in civil court if a person was found innocent due to using self defense (in florida). They also.mentioned that someone could bring a civil suite against him and cost him thousands of dollars in court fees just to have the case thrown out.
-
Not sure you have the right definition of NAACP ... National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
I have found it ironic this organization keeps "Colored" in it's name when that term is considered derogatory to many.
Lol, you think that's bad, what about the United NEGRO College Fund?
-
Is anybody else listening to Piers Morgan about this? Why do I put myself through this? Zimmerman's brother is handling himself very well though.
-
I think the previous poster was confused, the NAACP is circulating a petition for the Justice Department to open a case against Zimmerman for civil rights violations. Basically, the new stated position of the NAACP is that reporting someone to the police is a violation of their civil rights. Hooyah, NAACP, I've always thought you guys were awesome! (Sarcasm. Heavy.)
You are correct, sir.
-
By law not guilty. His life is forever changed though. I wouldn't feel safe walking around if I was him. Doesn't make it right but its the truth thanks to the media.
-
By law not guilty. His life is forever changed though. I wouldn't feel safe walking around if I was him. Doesn't make it right but its the truth thanks to the media.
If I was him I'd move to Wyoming. There's only like three black people in the whole state, so he'd probably be pretty safe.
-
>:D
-
Just drop the P ...
National Assn for the Advancement of Caucasians!
:thumbsup:
NAAC...National Association for the Advancement of CRACKAS!!! :rofl: :thumbsup:
-
If I was him I'd move to Wyoming. There's only like three black people in the whole state, so he'd probably be pretty safe.
Lol good call.
By the way if trayvon was Hispanic or white and Zimmerman was black this wouldn't be in the MSM.
-
He violated the rules that any credible ccw course lays out which say that you aren't supposed to be going out and starting conflicts. It sets up a standard where people can walk up, start a fight, and kill in self defense. Florida justice system was never very bright, though. Let them live with their interpretation of the law and the consequences of having a two-tiered system for people who look different. The hell they are creating will be punishment enough.
-
on a Youtube chat I watched they discussed this. And the out come was that no one cannot sue in civil court if a person was found innocent due to using self defense (in florida). They also.mentioned that someone could bring a civil suite against him and cost him thousands of dollars in court fees just to have the case thrown out.
Wouldnt worry too much about,
Since dissmissal would be a slam dunk, some pro 2a lawyer would probably take the case pro bono.
Also I was under the impression that any court fees are the responsability of the loosing party?
-
Wouldnt worry too much about,
Since dissmissal would be a slam dunk, some pro 2a lawyer would probably take the case pro bono.
Also I was under the impression that any court fees are the responsibility of the loosing party?
"any court fees are the responsability of the loosing party?"
Nope. Only if the defendant files a counter-suit for something like harassment (filing a harassment suit) or defamation and slander (lying about things the defendant said or did).
Our courts are set up so the weakest among us can still seek justice. If faced with the possibility of paying the winner, many complaints would be stifled.
-
Now the NAACP is considering pursuing a civil case against him.
http://www.businessinsider.com/george-zimmerman-not-guilty-naacp-verdict-civil-rights-2013-7 (http://www.businessinsider.com/george-zimmerman-not-guilty-naacp-verdict-civil-rights-2013-7)
Zimmerman should complain that as a hispanic man he's being unfairly treated by this continued assassination of his character.
-
http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/trayvon-martin-not-guilty-verdict-sparks-reaction-from-athletes-shaq-dwyane-wade-chris-paul-victor-cruz-071313 (http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/trayvon-martin-not-guilty-verdict-sparks-reaction-from-athletes-shaq-dwyane-wade-chris-paul-victor-cruz-071313)
i usually could care less what athletes or celebrities have to say but i must say reading some of their twitter comments is...interesting to say the least.
on a side note, 2a members ready for the potential race wars?? haha jk..sort of.
Funny how none of these Einsteins are saying that Aaron Hernandez is being single out and his rights are being walked all over.
-
My brother watched a majority of the trial on Court TV, or wheverever they aired it. Maybe the internet.
Anyway he said there's so much evidence that wasn't reported in the media. He was like the verdict was a no brainer.
Can you believe, his semi-adult daughter, who didn't watch the trial, is now mad at him for being a racist.
And his wife, her mother, has no haole in her. Hawaiian, filipino, chinese.
The damn media ! >:(
-
My brother watched a majority of the trial on Court TV, or wheverever they aired it. Maybe the internet.
Anyway he said there's so much evidence that wasn't reported in the media. He was like the verdict was a no brainer.
Can you believe, his semi-adult daughter, who didn't watch the trial, is now mad at him for being a racist.
And his wife, her mother, has no haole in her. Hawaiian, filipino, chinese.
The damn media ! >:(
Not just damn media; you know his kid must be indoctrinated daily at school - nowadays in public or private; no difference. All day long lib teachers pollute susceptible kids brains with left wing propaganda. He should ask his kid what she's been told at school and if that's the case he should start countering that shit with reality education at home - I wouldn't waste time pulling her out of school or confronting the teachers; I'd just counter educate with reality.