Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - benbangui

Pages: [1] 2
1
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 05, 2012, 12:08:12 PM »
I would rather have $600 in cash.............

yea... and that could go toward my bipod, bipod OD mount, micro OD mount, and optic OD mount... wait that might be more then $600... dangit :) lol
2
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 05, 2012, 12:06:47 PM »
I drawed you graff.

was this supposed to be in the assault pistol debate thread? :)
3
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 02, 2012, 08:25:33 PM »
And what I mean by 18"group is 4 out of 6 shots where actually on my man target :) the others... well let's not worry about them  :rofl:
4
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 02, 2012, 08:14:48 PM »
I believe you mean that the equation stays the same. 1 MOA at 100 yards is aprroximately 1", 1 MOA at 300 yards is approximately 3", 1 MOA at 1000 yards is approximately 10". Therefore, a 1/4 MOA group at 1000 yards is around 2.5".

Group size of 2.5" @ 1000 yards is world class. Heavy benchrest shooters have a hard time doing that.
?

Yes! That's what I mean :)
I was a little confused when he said "some people are saying they got 1/4 moan groups" and thought he was talking about me saying I got that with my bolt gun. Which I did once :) but only at 100yards so wind wasn't much a factor.

Ar on the other hand... im hoping to get under 1moa... well see when my next optic comes in :)

Believe me I KNOW its humbling. I've shot with NCPPRC in Sacramento quite a bit and took my 5Rmom out to 1K. My best shots at 1K WITH a bolt gun was a 18" group. Which I know isn't amazing but I was happy with it. Kept the target :)
5
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 02, 2012, 05:22:16 PM »
are you sure? your scope is like 1500... lol

lol that wasnt my personal optic :) i was just testing it for vortex ;)
6
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 02, 2012, 04:55:06 PM »
and those arnt exact numbers... thats just off my head giving the general idea of how the "measurement of MOA" is the same.... but the grouping size gets larger as you get further.

which is why i understand when someone sees only 1 inch group and a 3 inch group at 100 yards... they naturally think a $2000 rifle is not worth the difference in group size.

but not understanding that yes we are only talking 1 or 2 inch difference at 100 yards... but as you get further out and more distance... the MOA measurement changes and your 2-3MOA rifle is only capable of consistently hitting a 2foot group at 1000 yards....

like i said from the beginning if all you need to do is hit a man size target at 1000 yards... a standard AR is capable of doing that.

but if you want to consistently (yes ive said before there are occasional magic rifles out there) smaller groups then that... you need to upgrade your firearm.


some people dont wanna put a rifle together...

like for example home boy that talked about his varmit rifle being unreliable. he needs to put more time in it to make it reliable. BUT some people dont wanna spend there time in "building" the rifle... so what do they do...

they buy a $2000 AR :)


remember people... i dont own a $2000 AR... i just understand the benefits of it :)
7
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 02, 2012, 04:44:52 PM »
Check out 6mmAR.com and search for "Robert Whitley and what makes an accurate AR".

Come down and shoot at Puuloa 200, 300, and 600 yards.  Bring your expensive AR or budget AR.  You can spend as little or as much as you want on your AR, in the end all that matters is consisency and reliability.

F-class with optics, ten ring is 1 MOA and the X ring is 1/2 MOA.  I seen some posts that was saying that a 1/4 gun will shoot 1/4 at 500 or 600 even 1000.  Not true at all.  A lot of other factors come into play at longer distance.  With an AR you need the right ammunition to make it to 600.  55 grain ball will not do.  An AR with a standard length barrel and standard quick twists has no chance of 1K unless you are running WAY hot.(danger zone hot!).  A .308 will barely make it to 1000 yards BTW.  Wind will become a huge factor at these distances as well.

So instead of arguing, shooting groups at point blank range(100yards is point blank for a rifle with a optic IMHO), and speculating, folks should come out and experience a little 'MID Range' shooting at Puuloa.  It will certainly bring some things into perspective.
 :shaka:

...expensive or cheap...in the end all that matters is consisency and reliability.



agree! :) but i think we need clarification on the MOA thing. i was the one that said 1/4 MOA at 1000 yards.

i thought MOA was just a form of measurement? the equation that gives you a MOA grows as you increase the distance. but the sizing of MOA is still the same.

example:
1/4 MOA at 100 yards is exactly that.    1 quarter inch group at 100 yards...

but

1/4 MOA at say 600 yards actually on paper shows a grouping size of 2 or 3"... but its still called a 1/4 MOA group...

someone clarify this for me! cause that changes my whole concept of a minute of angle measurement!!!!

but yea 1/4 MOA group at 100 is 1/4... 300 is 2".... 600 is 3"... 800 is 5" 1000 yards the group ends up mesuring close to 6 or 7"... but it is still a 1/4MOA group cause the "minute of angle equation" grows as your distance grows...
8
Legal and Activism / Re: Assault Pistols and Hi-Cap Mags
« on: March 02, 2012, 01:20:22 PM »
but since it doesnt classify "assault pistol"... the reasoning i just posted above is out the window?

 ???
9
Legal and Activism / Re: Assault Pistols and Hi-Cap Mags
« on: March 02, 2012, 01:19:15 PM »
sorry... i might need to be brought up to date...

so is this in discussion to classify why it is ok to have standard cap rifle mags?

part of the reason we cant have standard cap rifle mags being that rifles (such as a AR) can be converted to pistols... and we are not allowed to have standard cap pistol mags?

10
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 02, 2012, 01:12:57 PM »
or maybe you want the malfunctions... so that way you can work on rifle manipulations :)

hey you can always give your crappy loads to me :D ill use em. ill keep them in a box to throw occationally in with my good ammo when im doing drills so i will be forced to do malfunction drills! :D
11
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 02, 2012, 01:07:11 PM »
^^^I built a varmint gun.  Didn't start off as an expensive build.  I ended up with a Shilen barrel, DD kit, Geiselle DMR trigger, etc. 

Well I take that sucker out to shoot it and had a jam fest.  Come to find out my reloads weren't what they should have been.  A bit too far off on the resizing.

Well I throw that very same ammo into my cheapy AR and it feeds and goes boom.  So for me, my sub moa varmint rifle did not even fire, but that very same exact ammo was fine with my other cheap AR.  So yeah, I don't believe expensive firearms always mean better accuracy/precision.

sounds like its a headspacing issue?

but that to me is the difference between a "home" build and a build by the high end companys. yes the parts might be the same... but for whatever reason yours didnt go together properly...

the guys at noveske or larue put it together... it messes up... they fix it untill it IS reliable...

see you just gave up and didnt try to fix it...




its the same concept as a 1911...

if it goes together with NOT high tollerances, (like a rock river ARMs. oh god i hope this doesnt start a 1911 battle lol) it is generally more reliable. little play in the slide to frame fit ect...
but a 1911 put together by wilsoncombat or nighthawk... it has high tollerances but also is FINE FITTED so that it is reliable as well... AND shoots 1in groups at 25yards (vs 5"groups)


same with ARs... yea you can throw a bunch of high end parts together and it may end up shooting good. (thats what i did and i didnt have to worry about it) but thats the difference when you have someone that has been putting guns together for a long time... if something doesnt work right... they know what it is to fix it.

so dont give up on your varmit rifle!!! figure it out. make it reliable. so you have both. reliability AND accuracy. :)

but dont git rid of your "lower end" AR. because next time you do crappy loads again, youll still have the shitty one to shoot the shitty ammo! :D
great for a carbine class and drills! :)
12
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 02, 2012, 12:12:47 PM »

............and yet you'd never hear of a Chevy guy dropping a Ford motor into their car..................  :D

lol so true!  :D
13
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 02, 2012, 12:11:53 PM »
yes :) the "occasional" exception to the rule is always there. as i said, if you your ar is a "shooter..."    awesome! keep it!

i had a reminton 5R stock, that outshot my friends rem700 that he has droped over $3000 into.

that was not the point of my posts or the reason to the answer of "why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one"

it has been made clear your point that a "cheaper gun" CAN be as good as a more expensive one...

but if you have 10 standard ARs... yes 1 might have tuned out to be that magic rifle... that shoots as good as a larue OBR.... but what about the 9 others?


i know 3 other friends that bought a rem5R same time i did.
mine shot a TRUE 1/4 MOA.
theirs all shot about 1/2-3/4 MOA

guys spend 600-1200 on a rifle that will guarantee 1MOA...
and some guys spend 3000-6000 on a rifle that will guarantee 1/4 MOA

my 5R proved what your saying.... yes. a cheaper rifle can shoot as good or sometimes even better then a more expensive rifle...

but its not the norm.

so when your asking a "general" question of why is a $2000 AR better then a $600 AR"...
the GENERAL answer is simply it is better build with more quality parts that make it more accurate...

(yes there are expeptions!)

no?  :-\
14
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 02, 2012, 10:36:52 AM »
this is crazy :) i think the problem in this discussion is some peeps are too prideful to say that yes...  everytime a good point is made against me... what do i say? i say, "hey your right! :)" but whats funny... is the points you guys bring up are factors yes... but they dont give reason the the OPs actual question... "why is a $2000 AR better then a $600 one?  and the only reason i keep going at this, is because it seams like the majority of you are one of those guys that is saying... "im a dame good shooter... and i will outshoot all these lil wipersnapers with there $2000 ARs!"

granted, yes you may! but you can not defy the FACTS...

if conditions where exactly the same, IN EVERY ASPECT, the same:

shooter
ammo
barrel length
twist rate
whatever you are gonna tell me i forgot after this post!!! lol

IF EVERY variable is the same...

a low end (or cheaper costing) AR is not going to be able to shoot as good as groups as a high end (or more expesive) AR.


the guy that spent $700 on his national match AR... THAT IS A MORE ESPENSIVE AR!!! and it outshoots a NON-national match AR...



sure, someone can buy a $600 AR... turn around and sell it for $2000... and that wont be any better....


we are comparing the quality of the firearm... NOT the price.... but price comes into play because generally a higher quality firearm is more expensive... why? because more time was spent into making it!!!! which makes it more quality and better!!!!


but what is amusing to me on top of all of this... are those of you that are in the frame of mind that,  "im a dame good shooter... and i will outshoot all these lil wipersnapers with there $2000 ARs!".... you are so stuck on that fact... and you are fighting it, not seeing the reality is that as technology gets better... gear gets better. true, sometimes people come out with stuff that doesnt really show that big of an improvement. and depending on how much more money they ask, it may not justify as WORTH IT to the individual shooter...

but thats just it... this is not a discussion of price... on if YOU think its worth it or not to have a upgrade on your firearm... the descussion really boils down to, does it make the firearm better or not.... does it make it more accurate or not....

and the answer is YES!!!!!!! a larue OBR shoots more accurately then a DPMS sportacal, or daystar, or any $600 AR.

now... as a individual shooter... the amount of improvement in accuracy may not be enough to justify spending $1500 MORE... but... that doesnt mean, the more expensive one is not more accurate...

im just as broke as you guys. actually im probably MORE BROKE! lol
i can NOT justify spending $2000+ on a AR...

but i also can not justify FACTS... and the fact IS... "why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?" well re read ALL my freaking posts if you still dont know lol and if your to stubborn to agree... or at least see the gist of what it is im saying... then  :shaka:

we all live another day  :crazy: :geekdanc: O0 :grrr: :-* ;D :wave: :rofl: :shake:
15
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 02, 2012, 10:15:13 AM »
one request, can we stop with the "... is better than a Mustang"?  I get it!

lol
16
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 02, 2012, 10:13:52 AM »

Feed your $4,000 AR junk ammo and it will shoot like.............well.............junk................

It's not a simple argument.  There are points made both ways about this situation.

yes your right :) and that is ANOTHER DIFFERENT DISCUSSION :)

but take same ammo... same shooter... high end AR.... low end AR... and the high end AR will shoot better! period!!!!



why does everyone bring up different things?!!?
17
Firearms and Accessories / Re: ammo deals
« on: March 01, 2012, 09:46:38 AM »
you guys think OGC will ship? like to the other islands? like... to kona? :)
18
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 01, 2012, 08:24:40 AM »
wow  ::)

in that case i really did just wast my breath lol.

you keep saying stuff like "i took a beater old crappy gun a shot it better then 'this guy' with his high end AR"

i am not saying YOU are not a good shooter!!!! you probably are amAZing... especially if you took that .25ACP and did good with it.
you are an amazing shooter :worship: im not doubting your abiblitys...

im just saying your line of reasoning is not correct when your talking about gear :)

and ANYone that doesnt agree with the few things ive posted... well...  :wtf:


as far as im concerned this thread is  :closed:  lol

and talk IS cheap... whoever it was that mentioned that... i would invite ANYone on here that doesnt agree with me about this to meet up at the range and compare shot groups with a junky AR and a quality AR :) and if you cant see the difference in your groups... dont worry... you will when i shoot my groups ;)    lol
19
Deals and Sales / Re: Why is a $2000 AR better than a $600 one?
« on: March 01, 2012, 12:06:31 AM »
a fool and his money are soon parted......... then that same fool is at the range with a 2k ar with a  1.5 k scope and pmags shooting wolf ammo


i think the original intent of this thread was more towards people pushing highend ars on new shooters that dont know any better.... but people taking it personnally is way more interesting

i think ghost said it perfectly in his first part...

the shooter dictates the ability... and definatly people push high end ARs to new shooters... and thats retarded.



but... (get your :popcorn: out... lol. here is my foot.... driving into my mouth again... lol)

even though im not into cars... saying that a mustang can outdrive a farrari... or a suped up honda civic is bettter then a subaru WRX... or a climber with a tent verses a climber with no tent... or a shooter with a LWRC verses a shooter with a stock AR.... is still dumb!!!!




what you MEAN to say is that a shooter dictates the ability's...




a good driver is gonna drive a mustang better then a novice with a fararri... or a good driver is gonna drive a honda better then a novice with a WRX... a good climber/outdoors man will be able to do better and last longer then ME with every gadget known to man! AND a good shooter $600 AR... will outshoot a novice with his noveske/LWRC/REPER .50 cal heatseeking/guided rifle!!!!     lol :D


a shooter dictates the ability!!!! dont confuse that with saying better gear is not as good as less quality gear!!!!




dont "knock" high end builds just because they are high end...  if you shoot with a $600 AR.... and you see no difference shooting it... with a high end AR... to me..........     lol

that just shows your ability...   and yes... lol stick with your $600 AR untill you are able to see the differance in accuracy...

(oh gosh im gonna get kicked off this forum and i dont even have 20 posts....lol)

but really... i say this from experiance from a friend of mine that shot my AR and his AR and couldnt tell the differance...

he simply couldnt tell because with his abilitys... he couldnt shoot more accuratly then the lower grade gun :)

so NO... no matter how you wanna try to put it.... a $600 AR CAN NOT OUTSHOOT A $2000 AR.

hehe  :shaka:
20
General Discussion / Re: Your favorite YouTube channels
« on: February 29, 2012, 11:42:37 PM »
lol thanks :)
Pages: [1] 2