Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Kevin

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
1
Legal and Activism / Re: Deedy Trial - Injustice?
« on: August 10, 2013, 08:54:48 PM »
After reading the excellent transcripts supplied here by Jl808, I am truly astounded no one has remarked at Deedy's total recall of everything.  I call BS, and months of careful coaching on just what to say.  Out of curiosity, were those security tapes available to the defense team?

This is a guy out getting blasted with his friends, and after butting into something none of his business (and possibly having a chip on his shoulder after his buddy clued him in on the locals' attitude) and has it go south on him.  From reading the testimony, Deedy started the incident.  From other cases I have read years ago, the self defense killing justification does not extend to because you were losing a fight you started.  I still think the badge waving and Federal this, Federal that crap is just that.  This clown was out on the town, not on a protective detail. 

What next, one of these off duty clowns cuts in front of you, you object, touch him, and he claims justification in wasting you?  I get that impression from a few posters here.

Plus it seems his department is distancing themselves from him during his trial by not providing 'expert witnesses for his defense' thus a sign that they did not agree with his actions and or he broke company policy.

Who did the defense call as witnesses??? I only heard of Deedy and the retired HPD Officer. Anyone else???

Also, if he was not intoxicated or did not think he would have blown over the limit then why did he refuse to take the breath test when he was being 'booked'???  Seems like a strange thing to refuse if it would help in your defense down the road
2
Legal and Activism / Re: Deedy Trial - Injustice?
« on: August 08, 2013, 07:42:07 PM »

At 1:30pm, testimony resumes.

"Elderts crime was an attack against a federal officer. His first physical attack was when I kicked him.  My foot reached him before his fist could reach me. It was the first federal felony that was committed."
"Before you made contact with Elderts, there was no crime being committed, correct?"  "I could not answer that in the affirmative or negative."


[color=black]"What crime had been committed?" "Verbal threats against myself and Mr. Perrine." [/color]
"You don't know, do you?" "No I do not know Hawaii law.".

So Deedy threw the first blow and he was not blind sided by a punch from Elderts??  Also, if it is crime for a person to be kicked by a Federal Officer then that is a good law to know... That is crazy!!!

Was Deedy trying to arrests Elderts for the Federal crime of verbal threats???

Lastly, did members of Deedy's department testify on his behalf especially to corroborate his training and that he was warranted to intervene.

Sorry haven't been keeping up with the trial but instead reading the notes. Don't think he 'intended' to murder thus will probably be found innocent but I don't think he followed the policy of his department either thus if no one came to testify on his behalf from the department that would be a big negative for his future career IMO.

Agreed.  All these punks,  thats what happens when keeping it real goes wrong........

Also, was Elderts being a punk. In the videos I saw Deedy was hovering over him when he was seated and Deedy female friend appeared to be trying to hold Deedy back. Takes two to tango. And the one who throws the first blow is usually the one who actually instigates physical violence. Local mentality, u punch first brah... Most times no blows thrown and go separate ways. Once a blow is thrown then game on. If he wasn't LEO but instead this was a conceal carry state I don't think his actions would go in his favor.

Even as an LEO he may have been acting beyond the scope of his duty.

But like I said, if I was on the jury I don't think Deedy is guilty of murder. Bad choices, yes... Shouldn't be in LEO anymore. Probably
3
Preparedness and Survival / Re: WORLD WAR Z = Insight Into Chaos
« on: July 08, 2013, 04:49:22 AM »
Wow.

World War Z really struck a chord in regards to the chaos panic will bring on. Great movie.

Anyway, if you want insight into a modern chaotic environment that could happen during a large scale natural disaster, the first 30-60min of the movie will provide you with a great representation.

Any day now.....

Zechariah 14:12
And the LORD will send a plague on all the nations that fought against Jerusalem. Their people will become like walking corpses, their flesh rotting away. Their eyes will rot in their sockets, and their tongues will rot in their mouths.
Zechariah 14:13
On that day they will be terrified, stricken by the LORD with great panic. They will fight their neighbors hand to hand.


5
Off Topic / Re: Marathon bombers found
« on: April 23, 2013, 06:41:25 AM »
Here's a video of the naked guy being taken away. The eyewitness being interviewed by the news reporter said that the police asked him to strip, probably checking if he has a suicide bomb or not.



Is this the older Tsarnev brother being arrested or was this someone that looked like him and got stopped and arrested by mistake?

Unless more comes out from this guy or from the Boston police that apprehended him, there's probably going to be continuing conspiracy theories that the older brother was captured then killed instead of the official story that he was killed in a firefight with police.

The 'official story' is that his younger brother killed him when he ran him over while trying to run over the police with the stolen SUV.  Also that the younger brother had a self inflicted wound to the back of his neck as a result of trying to commit suicide by 'eating' his gun. Then he is seen climbing out of the boat to surrender, that's one tough SOB if you ask me. I would be probably laying at the bottom of the boat melting away had I tried to take my own life and suffered a serious/critical injury.

http://www.rediff.com/news/report/did-boston-bomber-run-stolen-suv-over-his-brother/20130422.htm
6
Legal and Activism / CT new laws
« on: April 03, 2013, 12:16:06 PM »
Coming to your State too?? Well Hawaii is halfway there!

7
General Discussion / Re: watch your stuff at Kokohead
« on: March 24, 2013, 06:23:05 PM »
I asked the ro's on the rifle side if they had any updates and they didnt even know it happened!

Maybe nothing was stolen... Maybe some dude trying to prepare for when guns are illegal to own. Can't confiscate what you don't own....  Tinfoil hat but who knows
8
Legal and Activism / Re: Bye Bye to Assault Weapons Ban?
« on: March 22, 2013, 07:47:49 AM »
Stand with Diane. WTF





Sneaky little buggers. Since it happened once it could happen again. Time will tell
9
Off Topic / Assault Slingshots
« on: March 20, 2013, 10:09:57 AM »
Feinstein's worst enemy. The "assault" slingshot maker.  Pretty bad he has to order Oreos from Amazon.



10
General Discussion / Re: "GUNSHOW WISHES"
« on: March 10, 2013, 10:25:08 PM »
For the line not to be like this

12
Legal and Activism / Assault Weapon Hearing
« on: February 28, 2013, 11:32:08 AM »
14
Legal and Activism / Re: Obama to "Quickly" handle gun issue...
« on: January 18, 2013, 11:39:15 AM »
Interesting video... So why are they pushing for assault weapons ban?? Propaganda



15
Off Topic / Re: OT: Obama Phone Lady: The Sequel
« on: January 16, 2013, 10:13:22 PM »
I just had to post this. This is what we're up against, people. Masses of idiots with their hands out wanting the socialist nanny state - which will undoubtedly include gun confiscations à la the U.K..



Maybe if she can see the lies, more people in poverty will see the lies too. Maybe

16
General Discussion / Re: Heard the dumbest thing today.
« on: January 10, 2013, 09:59:10 AM »
Obviously he knew the permit process if he mentioned it to me. And he knew it was illegal when he stated no questions asked he would purchase with out having a permit and all that other legal stuff. Just for shits and grins I'm going to reply back and say ok. Just to see how far he's willing to take it.

I wouldn't reply and say "ok".  A guy I knew said ok to a female standing at the window of his car one cold lonely night and the next thing you know he was swarmed by a bunch of cops and put in handcuffs. Story for another day though.
18
General Discussion / Re: ak or ar?
« on: January 08, 2013, 09:31:14 PM »
AK for me
19
This is a joke.  We're more likely to repeal the Second Amendment right now than we are to repealing Presidential term limits--that is to say, it's not happening.

Exactly why I would wear a tin foil hat for a week if this passes. Then you know we are screwed.  :shake:
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5