Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - RangerBernie

Pages: [1]
1
General Discussion / Firearms confiscation is law in California
« on: March 25, 2013, 11:57:56 AM »
Get the fuller story: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/california-s-gun-repo-men-have-a-nerve-racking-job-155325406.html

On the evening of March 5, nine agents from the California Department of Justice, wearing bulletproof vests and carrying Glock pistols, assembled outside a ranch-style house in a Los Angeles suburb. They were preparing to confiscate weapons from a gun owner who’d recently lost the right to possess firearms after spending two days in a psychiatric hospital. They knocked on the door and asked to come in. These touchy encounters sometimes end in anger and, occasionally, handcuffs. This time, the agents came out peacefully with three guns. Then it was on to the next stop on the list for that night.

California is the only state that takes legally obtained weapons away from citizens who are no longer supposed to have them...

Be safe out there, Ranger Bernie
2
Legal and Activism / Re: Second amendment is history
« on: January 13, 2013, 11:00:31 AM »
The fact that so many Americans don't know this is, to me, incredibly sad.

It's a curse of "modern" education...I learned this back in the 70's during grade school when the American Revolution was part of the basic curriculum.  Now they're more concerned with "No Bullying" B.S. than actually teaching kids the history of this nation. So it's no surprise that 20 & 30 somethings (Obamanation voters) are so willing to give up rights that the Founding Fathers bled for. Maybe if they were taught and understood better, then things would be different.

Colt808 is right. We have a generation that can address Compliance, Diversity, Ethics and be "politically correct," they just cannot see the consequences of their voting actions . . .
"Compliance" takes on a new meaning in the Obamanation. First it will be assault rifles, then hunting and sport shooting rifles, then shotguns, then handguns, bow and arrows, slingshot, rocks in your yard  . . .
3
Legal and Activism / Second amendment is history
« on: January 11, 2013, 02:12:26 PM »
One thing many people fail to realize (because they are not taught it) is that the match that ignited America's War for Independence was not excessive taxes, or the lack of representation, or trade restrictions, or the lack of trial by jury (as important as these issues were). The match that ignited America's War for Independence was ATTEMPTED GUN CONFISCATION.

On April 19, 1775, British troops, some 800 strong, were dispatched to Concord, Massachusetts, to arrest Sam Adams and John Hancock and to seize a cache of weapons known to be stored at Concord. When Dr. Joseph Warren sent Paul Revere to warn Pastor Jonas Clark (in whose home Adams and Hancock were staying) that the Crown's troops were on their way to arrest the two men and seize the guns at Concord, he alerted his male congregants. About 60-70 men from the Church of Lexington stood armed on Lexington Green awaiting the Red Coats.

Upon spotting the citizen militia, a British officer demanded the men throw down their arms. They refused; and the British troops immediately opened fire. Eight of the Minutemen were instantly killed. The colonists returned fire in self-defense, and the shot was fired that was heard 'round the world. By the time the troops arrived at the Concord Bridge, just a few miles away, hundreds of colonists were waiting for them with muskets in hand, and the rest, as they say, is history.

Make no mistake about it: attempted gun confiscation ignited America's War for Independence. And I am convinced that Pat Buchanan is absolutely right. If the federal government attempts to confiscate the guns of the American people, "There would be a revolution in this country!"
4
Legal and Activism / Re: online map of gun owners
« on: December 26, 2012, 08:47:38 PM »
and here's the response: http://christopherfountain.wordpress.com/2012/12/24/sauce-for-the-goose/#comment-133586

ren, you are my hero. Here's the 411:

Let’s turn the tables on the Journal and see how they like it!

Journal News President:
—Janet Hasson, 3 Gate House Lane Mamaroneck, NY 10534 (914) 694.5204

Editors:
—Cyndee Royle, 1133 Westchester Ave., Suite N110, White Plains, NY 10604, 914-694-9300
–Nancy Cutler 9 Woodwind Ln, Spring Valley, NY. (845) 354 3485

Parent company of The Journal News Gannett
—–CEO Gracia C Martore 728 Springvale Rd Great Falls, VA 22066 (703) 759 5954

The reporter on the story is:
–Dwight R Worley 23006 139 Ave Springfield Gardens, NY 11413 (718) 527 0832

Copy and re-post this. Don’t let it get buried! Save a copy for when they re-set the comments.

 Now, if I just had their email addresses . . .
5
Legal and Activism / Re: online map of gun owners
« on: December 26, 2012, 08:43:50 PM »
Yah and a couple claymore mines strategically placed would be nice. :D

Yeaay!  I loved the idea of the remote sentry weapons system. And the claymores are a great deterrent! I used the claymore very effectively in several instances. My best kill was 12 KIA.
If I recall correctly, 700 3.2 mm steel balls at 3,937 feet/second. One time, I even took down a jeep full of targets. The jeep was, um, non-functional after the hit. So were the targets.
Warning: the claymore shoots out to 60 - 100 yards. Careful of the neighbors.

Ok, a dog is a more reasonable deterrent, but I like how you are thinking!
6
Legal and Activism / Re: online map of gun owners
« on: December 26, 2012, 08:33:33 PM »
Someone should publish online the name, residential address and telephone number of the journalist and the officers and directors of the corporation responsible for publishing the online map. It's perfectly legal.

Just because it is legal to publish the name, adr, etc. of gun owners, doesn't make it a good idea. Yes, it is legal for a solo woman to walk down a bad street in Kalihi (sorry, Kalihi brothers), wearing scanty clothes.
That doesn't mean it is a good idea.

My apologies to all my gun toting sisters, or those with knives, karate, pepper spray . . .  ladies who like scanty clothes . . .

Perhaps I should go knock on some news publishers doors, and "explain" my objections. It may be an interesting "conversation."
7
Legal and Activism / Re: More bad news.
« on: December 22, 2012, 10:46:27 PM »
clshade has a very good point: " There are MANY who fall into that same category. Should one's firearms rights be revoked if you have a nervous breakdown after a divorce? A bout with depression after a parent or child dies? Seek counseling after being raped? Attend AA or NA meetings? If you were declared ADHD in school? If you make some counselor a little nervous because you are intelligent and question the system's assumptions about itself?" As a former Army Ranger, we did some things that would be considered, um, "anti-social" by certain psychiatrists . . . And I also must agree that the DSM may soon include an affinity for firearms as a diagnosable condition. What if I piss off some "therapist," or counselor, and they decide I am on the black list? Try and get that off your medical/mental health records. If I carry a large knife under my car seat, does that make me suspect? Not that I would ever do that, of course . . . when I have room for my .357!
   Chicago is famous for disarming its citizens; it has some of the toughest gun laws in the USA. Chicago also has the highest murder rate in the US.  Lesson learned.
For my non-health care brothers/sisters: The DSM is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), the standard classification of mental disorders used by mental health professionals in the United States. It is intended to be applicable in a wide array of contexts and used by clinicians and researchers of many different orientations (e.g., biological, psychodynamic, cognitive, behavioral, interpersonal, family/systems). It is published by the American Psychiatric Association.
Merry Christmas!
8
Adam Lanza was the troubled gunman at the Newton, Connecticut elementary school killed 26 people, 20 of them children, and himself on Friday. He was known as "gothic, a loner, anti-social, borderline autistic."
Here is a look at some other school shootings in years past:

 April 2, 2012: One Goh killed seven people in a rampage at Oikos University in California. The shooter, One Goh, was angry because administrators refused to grant him a full tuition refund after he dropped out of the nursing program, said Jongjin Kim, the Oikos University dean. Online records in the two Virginia localities show that, while Goh was there, he racked up tens of thousands in liens and judgments, including a $10,377 debt to SunTrust Bank in 2006. The Internal Revenue Service also issued tax liens against him in 2006 and 2009 totaling more than $23,000, though he apparently paid about $14,000 back in 2008, according to records. According to Gloucester County Court records, Capital One sued him for $985.96 on an unpaid credit card bill, plus court costs. The court issued a judgment against him on Dec. 9, 2011.

 Feb. 27, 2012: Three students were killed and two wounded in a shooting spree that started in a school cafeteria in Chardon, Ohio, as students waited for buses to other schools. Police have charged T.J. Lane, who was 17 at the time, as an adult.

Feb. 14, 2008: Former student Steven Kazmierczak, 27, opened fire in a lecture hall at Northern Illinois University in DeKalb, Ill., fatally shooting five students and wounding 18 others before committing suicide.

April 16, 2007: Seung-Hui Cho, 23, fatally shot 32 people in a dorm and a classroom at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, then killed himself.

Oct. 2, 2006: Charles Carl Roberts IV, 32, shot to death five girls at West Nickel Mines Amish School in Pennsylvania, then killed himself.

Notice the recurring theme of mental illness among the shooters. I believe the vast majority of shooting enthusiasts are level headed, patriotic, law abiding citizens, like me.
Many more people are killed in motor vehicle accidents than shootings. Should we outlaw automobiles? Or regulate the loose nuts behind the steering wheels?
9
Legal and Activism / The same old gun control argument
« on: December 16, 2012, 08:53:40 PM »
You can bet there will be an increased emphasis on shootings in the news from now on. In addition to Newton, CN, there were reported shootings in California, and probably more in local news across the nation.
Of course, this will prompt renewed outcries regarding gun control. What sites do you recommend to follow the proceedings?
President Obama said "he would use 'whatever power this office holds'  in an effort to prevent more tragedies like Newtown. My 2aHawaii family knows where this is going . . .
  Get the fuller story at: http://news.msn.com/us/obama-at-newtown-vigil-us-will-have-to-change.
When I was in Israel, the school teachers carried Uzi sub-machine guns. Perhaps they have a different idea about "preventing tragedies."
10
Also look up
"299 days" basically same collapse scenario except it starts from economic collapse and govt fuckup.

Are you referring to the "One Second After" by William Forstchen, 2009? It was number 11 on the New York Times Bestseller list in 2009.
And "299 Days" by Glen Tate, 2012. This is the first in a series of three. It is a great read, straightforward and quick. It is from the prepper's point of view.
Warning: there are some Libertarian slanted sections, so I had to curtail my conservative edge for a bit. But, I keep a keen edge on my Bushmaster.
11
I must agree with Inspector: food, water, firearms, ammunition. The idea of having smaller barter items is great, and small amounts of ammo are easy to carry, easy to hide, easy to give at a good price. Those of us who can reload will be valuable, as will the reloader machine, but we will need the basic materials. Just short of the ammunition, which may be in short supply: a wrist rocket slingshot is lightweight, requires a little practice, and easier to reload: there is ammunition everywhere!  Thanks for the info on Bosnia, a SHTF will probably be similar. Two things manifest when SHTF: 1) the very best of humanity rises to organize and care for others, and 2) the worst of humanity become vandals and vermin. Your best bargaining materials are not materials: it is the relationships and skills you bring to the group. I'm REAL interested in forming a network now to be ready for the future. Takers?
12
When the world goes to carp when precious metals aren't valued in relation to basic survival items, I wouldn't want to live in that world. I want my fast food drive thrus, my TV, internet and A/C.

I must agree with KK. After your McDonald's has been out of commission for awhile, I will take good care of your personal items after you are gone . . .
Seriously, gold is heavy and difficult to carry. You need small items for barter, and the best prep: make friends with other preppers. All of us are stronger than any one of us.
I can trade: my soldier and medical skills are worth much more than gold.
13
Strategies and Tactics / Re: Home defense
« on: October 08, 2012, 11:08:05 PM »
I got a list of HDF Fun Shoot people that I am calling if the zombie apocalypse comes down :P.   At least I know, if nothing else, there is a good level of firearm competency!

Yes, if the government suspends the welfare system and EBT cards (because we've run out of money from raiding Social Security), the zombie apocalypse may be upon us.
Add a bow and arrows to your arsenal, you may need it. Slingshot, anyone?
14
Strategies and Tactics / Re: Home defense
« on: October 08, 2012, 11:02:24 PM »
Army Ranger? I should be asking you the questions! Pretty much everything I learned was on the internet and from friends mixed with trial and error. I realized that moving around a hd shotgun is too much here, especially having neighbors on all sides that can see and hear everything. Plus in order to use the attached flashlight I have to present and point it all over the place. I agree with you and now feel much better off with a handgun and separate flashlight. No need to alarm anybody who doesn't need to be alarmed. Worked pretty well when someone fell on the other side of the house and I went to check on them to see what the noise was. Only thing they noticed was the flashlight and were happy that I came help.  :love:

Yes, I am a former Army Ranger. The HDF is a great place to ask questions, so rely on what your HDF friends have to say. Of course, because I am a nice guy, I will listen to just about anybody; agreeing with their opinion is another matter. Having neighbors may be a plus: good people will come to your aid in a crisis, so we hope! To check that bump in the night, I hold my Maglite with my left hand, the handgun in my right. If you can picture it, I rest the left forearm on my right forearm. I'm sure you have seen this position. Practice: pull your shotgun out and move around the house, then repeat the same drill with your handgun. A dramatic difference. Go out in your yard and check your fields of fire and mobility.
Warning! If the government just suspends all those EBT cards, we will have a zombie apocalypse! So keep up on your marksmanship practice.
15
Strategies and Tactics / Re: Home defense
« on: October 06, 2012, 02:57:08 PM »
I like to use both a laser sight grip and hand carry a small flashlight.  This way, in my opinion I can manipulate either when needed for better situational awareness and sight picture.  Just my .02

I see your point. I must agree with heavy barrels: a 3d Maglite is a very nice HD weapon. Stay safe!
16
Strategies and Tactics / Re: Home defense
« on: October 06, 2012, 02:52:03 PM »
#4 buck for loud noises in the house and 9mm pistol for checking outside/answering the door. I live in a very dense neighborhood with lots of single wall construction chewed away by termites and have mapped out some shooting lanes that have more than one wall or some appliances/tools in the way. The neighborhood kids here are really nice and i'd rather die than hit one of them by accident so in some cases shooting is not an option, but the benefits are more people watching each others back so I give away stuff from the garden and make conversation any chance I get.

I must strongly agree with heavy barrels. In addition to staying proficient on your choice of weapons, there is strength in numbers. I like the idea of making friends with neighbors. I'll watch your back, you watch mine. When in the ARmy Rangers, we did not go on missions alone. We planned the entire mission with the thought that my Ranger Buddy will be there for me, I am there for him. To the point of Home Defense, I am thinking that a shotgun will scatter at some distance, but is accurate in less than 25 feet. How big is your home? I don't have a room bigger than 25 feet, so I rely on a smaller, easier to manage handgun. Do I really need my favorite 9mm Glock? Perhaps a .357 would be a better home defense weapon. What is your opinion?
17
Strategies and Tactics / Re: Home defense
« on: September 30, 2012, 06:19:13 PM »

Was open sights with a flashlight...

Now working on a semi w/ laser & flashlight combo.... :thumbsup:

A laser does not give you the wider range of vision that a flashlight gives. The laser is more pinpoint, the flashlight gives you a larger area of vision. For Home Defense, I'm thinking the flashlight gives you a bigger picture, a better assessment of the threat (are there more than one?), plus a look at the background (where's my daughter?). Laser is accurate at a specified distance.
18
Strategies and Tactics / Re: Home defense
« on: September 30, 2012, 06:14:06 PM »
I guess if you are talking about having to try out a few shotguns before we decide I guess you could twist my arm into it!  :D

The problem I have is not I am not much of a shotgun person. I have a lot confidence in my abilities with my .357 Magnum and I have very little experience with a shotgun. In an emergency if I had both to choose from I would probably take the .357 Magnum nine out of ten times. Maybe even if the shotgun was the better choice under the circumstances. Instinct and old habits die hard.

I agree with many of my forum brothers: the sentiment is that a handgun is more manuverable in a tight spot, like my bedroom or living room. Also agreed that a shotgum is nice to have for some distance. Will most others affirm that a shotgum is most useful at 25 - 100 yards? My pistol (Glock 9mm) can be used at point blank, and also can hit a target at 100 yards. In either case, proficiency is paramount, so get out and practice! Invite me to come practice with you.We all learn a lot from each other. There is strength in numbers.
Pages: [1]