Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - mnpfamily

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
General Discussion / Re: Presbyopia and shooting glasses
« on: June 15, 2016, 11:45:03 AM »
I started using progressive lenses a little over a year ago. Great for everyday wear, not so good for shooting though, as I had to tilt my head back to see the front sight clearly. I recently got a pair of glasses just for shooting. Non-dominant eye corrected for distance, dominant eye corrected for the front sight. It works extremely well for me, but I mainly shoot pistol. I put them on in the morning before i shoot to let my brain get used to them, haven't had any issues so far.  I do shoot with both eyes open though, both with rifle and pistol. The progressives work fine if I'm shooting with optics, both scope and red dot. 
2
Nope, in my opinion, shouldn't be required.  It's all a part of shooting at a range as far as I'm concerned.  I personally use a brass catcher as I'm way too lazy to chase down all my brass and because I don't want my brass hitting my neighbor.  But to require it, definitely no.  As far as ROs getting involved, they should be concentrating on keeping the line safe. 
3
Off Topic / Re: cigar room
« on: February 07, 2015, 11:38:46 PM »
Smoked a Flor De Las Antillas (by My Father) earlier this evening.  Excellent cigar, would be a really good first cigar of the day, or lunch time smoke.  Super smooth, lots of smoke, no bitterness or harshness, medium strength.  Wish I'd bought a couple more today.  Will probably buy a box on my next CI order.  Somewhat similar to Romeo y Julieta 1845, just a little smoother, not quite as medium-full bodied as the RyJ 1845, more like a medium.  Would be a really good everyday, anytime cigar.
4
9mm:  147 MG CMJ with Titegroup and Vhit N320.  Both were low recoil, low smoke, the N320 was super clean, TG fairly sooty.  Prefer N320 due to being cleaner and it fills the case better.
147 SNS LFP with N320 in the past, but have switched to SNS coated bullets with the same powder.

.40 S&W:  180 MG JHPs, 180 SNS coated and Bayou Bullets with N320, Ramshot Competition and TG.  I prefer N320 and Ramshot Competition over the TG loads.  The coated bullets are way cheaper and with N320, just as clean as the JHPs at a fraction of the cost.  In my M&P, the coated fed with no problems, in my 2011, have to use a FCD to help minimize chambering issues.  TG didn't smoke very much with the coated bullets, smoked like you wouldn't believe with lead.  TG also was way dirtier no matter what bullets I used.

.45 ACP:  200 SNS LSWC with N320.

.38 Super:  124 MG JHPs with Vhit 3N38 and 3N37.  Loads are used in pistols with comps.
5
Reloading / Re: 9mm accuracy and power factor
« on: January 01, 2015, 07:22:50 PM »
Another benefit of the heavier bullet is that it takes less velocity to make PF than a lighter bullet.  With a 124, you'll need around 1010 fps or so, and that's just barely making the 125 PF required for minor.  With a 147, 855 fps will get you the minimum PF.  I typically shoot for around 130-132 PF for the regular matches, and slightly higher if there's a chrono stage. 
Less velocity required normally means less powder used.  As Oldfart's post mentioned, powder availability is a major concern right now, so for me, any little bit saved is an added plus.
On another note, since you're going to be experimenting with coated bullets, Titegroup might be a powder to consider.  TG is super smokey with lead, but I tried some with the Bayou coated bullets in .40, and noticed very little smoke.  J. Hara's had some recently, not sure if they have any left though.  Maybe grab a lb. to try and then keep an eye out for when WGS gets a shipment of N320.  1# of TG when used with 147s at minor PF lasts awhile.  Downsides I've found though, are that it takes very little case volume, it's a hot powder, it's unbelievably smokey with lead, and its not as cheap as it used to be.
6
Reloading / Re: 9mm accuracy and power factor
« on: December 31, 2014, 11:35:11 PM »
Thank you for the info.  What I'm looking for.  Any Bullseye loads or Unique?  Unique fills the case nicely, but not sure if I'll be able to get any more after the little that I have runs out. 

After researching and looking at the data available, I am real comfortable using 9mm, with modern hollow points and propellents, for my SD needs.  I'd agree that a bigger faster piece of lead is "less pussy", but I still have switched over to the way of thinking, more holes in target the better the chance.
Sorry Heavies, I didn't realize you were looking for SD type load data.  When I I saw the 125grn vs 147grn and making power factor, I just assumed it was for a USPSA type load.  Sorry bout that, all my reloading data is pretty much slanted towards USPSA loads that are "accurate enough", reliable, and make either USPSA minor or major PF safely and with as little recoil as possible.  I haven't loaded with BE, nor Unique as I've only used Vhit powders, TG, and to a lesser extent Ramshot Competiton.  For what it's worth, I've found these relatively fast powders, under a relatively heavy bullet (for respective calibers), very good competition loads.  I have no idea at all how they would perform in SD loads.  Sorry again for the confusion.
7
Reloading / Re: 9mm accuracy and power factor
« on: December 30, 2014, 11:15:25 PM »
I used to use approx 3.4Viht N320 under a 147grn SNS LFP @ 1.115 OAL.  Yup, sounds a little short, but that's what would drop check in the barrel.  Made 135 PF out of my M&P Pro and was really soft shooting, with no over pressure signs.  My data suggests the coated are a tad bit slower (in .40 anyway) so a chrono is a good idea if you need to make PF.  To me anyway, the 147s have noticeably less muzzle rise than 124s at the same power factor.
I used to use TiteGroup with MG 147 CMJ bullets, but @ 3.2 grains, (130 PF), I could pull the handle 3x before the case would overflow.  When I looked into the case at the 2nd station on my press, I could hardly tell the difference between a correct charge and a double, and that was one big reason I switched to N320.  I have switched back to TG for practice ammo though, since N320 is pretty much impossible to find.  Just have to be careful with such a dense, fast powder and slow down a little when reloading.
Another benefit with the 147s are they seem to knock poppers down easier, but I know some prefer the feel of the 124 grn bullets.  I couldn't see much accuracy difference between the 124s and the 147s but I've never been really concerned with Bullseye Shooting type accuracy.  Also, I'm not really a load tinkerer, if it's reliable and doesn't tumble and am in the black @ 25 yards, I'm satisfied with the load accuracy for what I need.
The coated bullets from SNS are excellent, way better and cleaner than bare lead.  I just found them a little harder to get set up without knicking the coating when seating.  Bayou Bullets is another option for coated, I'm really liking them for .40.
8
brianenos.com has a wealth of info regarding USPSA topics (go to the forums section).  The reloading section is excellent and contains up to date and accurate info for both new and experienced hand loaders, especially for those looking for guidance with competition and general load data. 
9
Off Topic / Re: cigar room
« on: December 20, 2014, 02:40:27 PM »
No Cubans, but i did smoke a Perdomo 10th Anniversary Champagne after loading 300 each .38 Super and .40 S&W.  Super smooth and pretty tasty and more smoke output than TiteGroup under a bare lead bullet. :thumbsup:
10
Got a new Shooter's Connection range bag.  While I was at it, ordered an Arredondo mag release button to match the magwell on my wife's pistol.
11
General Discussion / Re: What ear protection do you use?
« on: November 19, 2014, 10:54:30 PM »
Thanks for that, very informative. One of the comments mentioned getting custom plugs from an audiologist, has anyone gone this route? I know there was a vendor at the show selling custom plugs but they were pretty expensive.
My wife and I both use the custom molded plugs bought at the gun show.  For us anyway, the custom molded plugs are terrific.  No more messing with foamies, (yes the foamies are cheap and do work great if you use them correctly), and no need to double plug with foamies and over-ear protection.  We shoot mostly pistol, so I'm not sure what rifle shooters are looking for in ear pro, but in our experiences, the custom molded are hard to beat.  My wife shoots a comped Open Div gun which can be obnoxiously loud unless you're directly behind the gun.  Using the custom molded plugs, I'm able to stand next to her and spot while she shoots. 
The downsides though, they do make hearing normal conversation a little more difficult (we sometimes end up yelling at each other while at the range) and for me anyways, took a day or so to get used to in my ears.  If for any reason my ear canals change size/shape and I need another set made, I would not hesitate to go this route again. 
Will probably look to have ours kids sized and fitted for these at the next gun show.
12
Off Topic / Re: Drunken posting
« on: November 17, 2014, 09:20:45 PM »
Newcastle is okay and Samuel Smith Brown Ale is GREAT but too expensive, anyone have any recommendations for a good Brown Ale that falls between these?
Smithwick's is somewhat similar.  While it's actually an Irish Red Ale, it has some similarities to Newcastle.  It has a little more crispness though, and not as much of the caramel sweetness that Newcastle seems to have at times.  Goes on sale fairly often too.
13
General Discussion / Re: Christmas Wish List?
« on: November 13, 2014, 10:48:18 AM »
2 8# kegs of Ramshot Competition or 4 4# jugs of Vhit N320, and 4 4# jugs of Vhit 3N38.  Either that or an end to this pistol powder shortage that seems to be lasting way too long now.
14
Off Topic / Re: cigar room
« on: October 31, 2014, 08:48:45 PM »
Relaxing with a Perdomo Habano Maduro and some Longboards after messing with a new Open gun and trying to figure out why it wouldn't go completely into battery.  After a some frustration and a whole lot of bad words, I'm hoping its just a really tight build.  This cigar is really good though, similar in taste to an Oliva Serie G Maduro, but smoother.
15
Off Topic / Re: cigar room
« on: October 23, 2014, 07:55:14 PM »
i don't think the draw or tightness of the cigar depends on the shape so much.
i prefer the larger cigars, i get more smoke with less effort, and better taste.
IIRC, i had a couple AF that were a tight draw as well.  could be the brand.
Thanks, I too have noticed that Fuentes seem to have a slightly tighter draw than other brands.  The AF 858 maduros are pretty much my go-to smoke, and while they are considerably tighter than say, Gurkhas, these Hemingways just seemed a lot tighter.  Guess I'll keep experimenting and maybe give the torpedo shape another try.  Thanks again for the insight.
16
Off Topic / Re: cigar room
« on: October 23, 2014, 01:04:50 PM »
Just finished a Cru Royale.  Wasn't really my taste, sorta bitter.  Not harsh, but bitter, almost had somewhat of a grapefruit-type bitterness and taste.  On a side-note, I have a quick question for you more experienced cigar smokers.  As a whole, do you find that the perfecto and torpedo shaped cigars have relatively tighter draws than say toro shapes?  I recently tried an AF Hemingway Best Seller Maduro (perfecto) and a La Traviata Maduro (torpedo), and I had a tough time getting a nice draw from both.  Took almost 1/2 the cigar before they loosened up enough to get the draw I like and the amount of smoke I like.  I don't think they were plugged, just seemed to have a really tight draw for awhile.  I really like the flavors of these two cigars once they opened up, just seemed like it took way more work than smoking a regular shape. 
17
Off Topic / Re: cigar room
« on: October 22, 2014, 11:46:24 PM »
My fav...
Arturo 858 maduro and La Gloria Cubana in most any size.
I don't indulge very often since smoking at the range is prohibited now.
Just picked up a La Gloria Cubana Serie 5 this evening, (along with a couple of La Traviata Maduro, and some Partegas 1845s for variety), looking forward to trying the La Gloria tomorrow.  Like to try before I box order online.  Seems kinda similar to reloading, nice to make sure the components "work" before ordering in bulk. 
18
Off Topic / Re: cigar room
« on: October 08, 2014, 01:19:15 PM »
Arturo Fuente 858 (I like the Maduro more than the Natural), for an everyday, 5 Vegas Gold or Classic for an anytime.  Perhaps not the most expensive, but very consistently smooth and tasty.
19
Reloading / Re: New bullet coating "HI-TEK"
« on: September 11, 2014, 05:29:30 PM »
.
...
I would be curious to know if the coating dissolves when exposed to a solvent like carb cleaner or brake cleaner or acetone.
My current routine is to lightly lube my pistol cases to reduced sizing friction (even with carbide dies).

Then remove the lube and fingerprints with a solvent. So the coating would have to withstand solvent. If it does not, it might smear melted plastic all over the ammo.
Just tried shooting both the SNS Coated and the Bayou Bullets coated with non-chlorinated Brakleen.  I let 2 of each sit in it until the brake cleaner completely evaporated, no smearing found.  I sprayed the other 2 and tried wiping hard with a rag, same results, no transfer onto the rag.  This is with the bullets only, not loaded cartridges, so I'm not sure if anything happens after they are fired. 
I've found the coated to be really good stuff in normal production type guns.  I have run into some issues with loading both coated bullets for a custom 2011 with an Infinity Ultimatch barrel.  Pretty sure I would've run into the same issues if I had been loading bare lead though, as I don't think the problem is the coating so much as the larger size of lead vs. jacketed.
20
Reloading / Re: New bullet coating "HI-TEK"
« on: September 11, 2014, 05:11:53 PM »
Do you load them at cast velocity, or do you(or can you) push them a little harder?  Not jacketed speeded, I'm sure, but just a little faster?

I've been using the coated bullets from SNS since they first came out, was using bare lead from them before that.  I load them in 9 and .40 and my data tends to show that with all else being the same (OAL, powder, bullet weight, etc,), out of my guns, the coated bullets from SNS tend to be a little slower than bare lead.  In .40 with 180 grn LFP, average velocity was 810 fps (145 PF USPSA load).  Same powder charge with coated, average velocity was 750.7 (135 PF). 
Major PF loads in .40 showed the same trends, but were a little closer with coated being about on average 10fps slower. 
The coated are a lot cleaner, both during reloading and after shooting, however for me anyway, the coated took a bit more time to get the belling die set correctly.  Too tight, and coating would be knicked off the bullet, exposing lead.  Too big, case mouths would split after only a few reloads.
Bayou Bullets (one of the first to offer the coated bullets in the US),now takes orders online and do have sample packs.  I've read that some use their coated bullets in Open Div Major PF loads in comped guns with no issues.  Velocities in .38 Super/SuperComp hit mid 1300 fps with 124grn bullets and if leading were an issue, comps would be getting messed up.  I've never tried them in Open loads, I prefer to stick with MG to prevent any chances of leading in the comp at those velocities.  I've read reports from different shooters saying they've seen no leading at all, while others have reported having to scrape lead from the baffles of their comps.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10