Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - mangosteenqueen

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 15
1
Preparedness and Survival / Re: What Guns and Gear to "Panic Buy"?
« on: October 20, 2023, 08:46:51 PM »
With all these wars and stuff happening, body armor. The 2020 riots and the kickoff of the war in Ukraine put huge stresses on armor supply and “raw” materials to make armor. Israel is next
2
I had one. It was alright but the distortion (fisheye) effect can get a little annoying, and no killflash for the very reflective front lens. Could probably spot me a mile away with that front lens reflecting light in all its glory.

Reticle is still a football shape when viewed through a magnifier.
3
I have a M951 that’s been adapted to use the Malkoff E2HT scout heads (powered by 16650 batteries).  It’s got a tight beam that’s perceptively not very bright indoors but it really does shine outdoors for further distances. For closer distances, I think it’s better to have something that offers more flood rather than jumping on the pure candela train. Cloud defensive offers a good balance with flood and throw, and much easier on the eyes than lights using cooler tint heads especially in heralding weather conditions or just overall spore and water particles in the air at night

Aside that I’m a sucker for warm/neutral tint lights, I’ve found that the Lumens factory neutral white bulbs are a great alternative over the Malkoff M61 drop-in bulb especially for a little less cost.

I’ve also used some handheld lights on the AR. An Armytek Dobermann Pro and a Nitecore P20i. Both are fantastic at throw and spill for both indoors and outdoors but they’re limited to momentary clicky caps on 1” ring mounts. There are wire pressure switches for them but I have not tried them but I don’t think I’d trust them either. You can almost never go wrong with the clicky cap besides the limitations to ambidexterity. The P20i is a bit hefty though.
 Pretty soon I’m hoping to grab a couple Eagtac (Eagletac) lights and see how they hold up.
4
Firearms and Accessories / Re: Red Dot for AR-15
« on: November 16, 2022, 06:38:30 PM »
Aimpoint PRO is pretty basic but my issue with them is the battery life and accessibility to batteries. With my sample of one, to have the red dot at a reasonable brightness it drains the battery faster than the 1-2 year battery life people claim. The battery is also rather special, so you have to order them online.

Comp M4 is great and I prefer it over the PRO simply because of the battery, but get the M4S because the battery housing will be less obtrusive to the sight picture. Also you’d be in for a good deal if you get a used one. Brand new is pretty expensive. I have had it for a few years and only changed out the battery maybe once.

Holosun 503 is good for what it is. Durable Chinese red dot and has nice features like the shake awake. Basically it’s a bootleg T2 but with a slight blue tint.

Holosun AEMS. May generate some mixed feelings because the glass is a bit distorted closer to the edges, which is pretty much like a fisheye effect. I like it though. Very light, very little optic body to get in the way, shake awake, and the built in lens covers are great. Wished there was a kill flash for it though.

Eotech xps2. Was pretty neat while I had it. Was not a fan of the feature where the lens coating starts to spiderweb from (apparently) moisture damage despite spending most of its time being stored away. Still probably the best 1x sighting unit to use with a magnifier though because the reticle is very crips while the other dots I mentioned have a football shape.
5
Off Topic / Re: Hawaii's Mauna Loa volcano 5.0 earthquake
« on: October 17, 2022, 06:23:21 PM »
There’s no eruption nor is one imminent. However it will not be surprising if it did erupt since volcanic eruptions happen during/after heightened seismic activity, but that doesn’t mean that heightened activity with no eruption over the past decades is just wash.

In other words, those living on the big island should continue as normal but should also be prepared in the event it does erupt. Things can change on a short notice, after all.
6
Strategies and Tactics / Re: Ballistic helmets?
« on: October 11, 2022, 09:46:25 PM »
So it’s just the matter of having actual modern armor than something that still puts your life at risk if it were to be employed for personal protection.
7
Strategies and Tactics / Re: Ballistic helmets?
« on: September 23, 2022, 09:08:26 PM »
Nothing particularly wrong with using steel for weight/endurance training and use ceramic for range/“real” practical purposes, so as long as the training regime is conducted in such a way that it doesn’t destroy your knees on the long term. Training with heavier weights makes lighter equipment (ceramics)  feel even lighter and puts less of an impact on endurance.

For actual use as body armor, nah. That’s bad insurance.
8
Strategies and Tactics / Re: Ballistic helmets?
« on: September 20, 2022, 12:29:49 PM »
Shot Stop posted a vid of a few models of plates and they're being wacked with a hammer and a cinder block dropped on them.  Then they immediately shot them and they held up.

My Duritium PA was 1 model and it worked as advertised.  This model is rated 3+ and does not stop greens, as the manufacturer states it doesn't stop them.  However, if you add a trauma pad to this, then it will.   The Duritium are PE.

Yeah duritium is just a trademark label for PE. Never looked into whether it’s spectra or dyneema and which grade, but I don’t think it’s anything particularly new.

Not sure what the deal is with the + rating if it doesn’t stop M855, but the “+” nomenclature is very loose and for marketing anyway.
Something to note is that the Shotstop III+ is pretty thin for a UHMWPE plate. To be capable of stopping M855 it needs to be thicker, hence the idea of having a IIIA backer behind it to make up for the reduced UHMWPE layers on the Shotstop plate and therefore adds some weight and thickness to the overall setup. Kinda wasted effort imo.
9
Strategies and Tactics / Re: Ballistic helmets?
« on: September 18, 2022, 10:04:14 PM »
Ceramics are tougher than people think. Not that you should deliberately be smacking them and dropping them or getting hit by a car while wearing them. Those plates are gonna be on you as a part of you, so treat yourself with care. Much like a car, you take care of it and it will take care of you for many many years.
Even if there’s a crack, a well made ceramic plate should be laminated with strong adhesives and thus the plate will hold together enough that there wont be much significance in performance degradation from a crack.
As for age, it shouldn’t matter so as long as they weren’t horribly abused and neglected. There are Vietnam chicken plates and 90s era ranger plates that stop their intended threats.

100% PE (UHMWPE) plates are not really the way to go. PE is not known to reliably perform well against stuff like M855, so you’d be playing with fire regardless if they’re marketed to stop it. However, certain PE plates may be applicable in certain circumstances or requirements with some caveats.

There’s not much reason to stick with steel these days. It’s a obsolete body armor material with risk and downsides outweighing the benefits. In any case, go for multicurve ceramic plates. The money you don’t spend on steel plates and rifles/accessories that only see the light of day a couple times a year helps invest in ceramics.


As for helmets, just stick to a reputable US manufacture such as Opscore/Gentex, Highcom, custom armor group, revision/galvion, whatever flavor of milsurp ACH/ECH helmet as long as it’s not compromised and you put a upgraded helmet liner than standard ones.
10
PHLster Enigma might be of interest? It’s a pretty popular holster for deep concealment, any attire.
11
Firearms and Accessories / Re: AR adjustable gas blocks
« on: April 16, 2022, 05:52:01 PM »
Really for any AR, build your stuff with the right parts and you won’t really need an adjustable gas block. It’s all more or less a band aid for industry inconsistencies.
12
Firearms and Accessories / Re: AR adjustable gas blocks
« on: April 16, 2022, 01:12:44 PM »
Usually I just throw in a sprinco “hot white” buffer spring and a H1 or H2 buffer. I don’t really see the need for adjustable gas blocks especially in this state that doesn’t allow suppressors into legality.
13
Honestly body armor has become a bit stagnant. While research for newer materials to tackle modern threats (which is also kinda stagnating) continues, I don’t see the viability to move away from the current ceramic armor technology.

Maybe at the least government contracted armor companies and researchers in those companies will expand on the ceramic armor tech. There’s plenty of research finding how how to improve the construction of the ceramic plates such as the arrangement of the UHMWPE sheets, monolithic vs mosaic ceramic cores,…etc. but I don’t think we’ll see much from the armor industry for a while.
The slowly growing fad is the flexible rifle armor. Stealth Armor Systems makes a good one and it can be custom shaped but even the designer says that it has its limitations on what threats it can handle.


Some certain companies have coined titanium armor but really it’s no different from steel plates, that being the result of spalling and ricochet and excessively heavy. You can exclude that from being an option. Rumor is that there has been a casualty with the steel or titanium Velocity Systems ULV plates, and those who are using that armor system have been issued ceramic versions of the ULV as a result. Anything that’s performs similarly to steel and titanium where they redirect the mass of the projectile, is not worth it.
14
Firearms and Accessories / Re: In Eugene Stoner’s own words...
« on: October 21, 2021, 02:44:12 PM »
Idk. It’s got some things I just don’t agree with. Pencil barrel? Combat has evolved to where you would see diminishing returns from a thin barrel and high volume of fire. Polymer lower? Has integrity limitations that it’s limited to a carbine carbine buffer instead of benefiting from a rifle length buffer. Not sure if they even considered the A5 buffer. Red dot is pretty standard but magnified optics is the game these days.

For a civilian rifle I bet it would be okay however possibly a stretch for military use.
15
General Discussion / Re: Knives what next?
« on: September 03, 2021, 06:25:24 PM »
Taking away one of the oldest (although refined) tool of mankind. Geez
16
Y’all have access to 9mm? Shiiii
17
General Discussion / Re: Body armor for women
« on: June 28, 2021, 09:55:19 PM »
RMA has plates designed specifically for women. I believe servicewomen still use sapi/esapi plates just like every other service member but don’t take my word for that.

Stealth Armor Systems Hexar HFRAS (sapi/shooters cut) is a good option too but expensive.

Plate carrier option doesn’t really matter as long as it’s a decent brand. The plate is the more important part.
18
Vortex micro 3x is what I replaced my primary arms gen 4 with. Definitely a significant improvement with clarity, weight, and size.

The downside is that the eye box is tighter but the eye relief is decently long and generous for me at least, and of course it costs like 2-3 times the price of the primary arms gen 4
19
Firearms and Accessories / Re: Glock 19 is obsolete
« on: March 03, 2021, 01:52:46 PM »
That’s more of a basic safety issue. I don’t think it would make much of a difference for any other firearm if you don’t drop the mag and check the chamber a few times briefly.
20
Firearms and Accessories / Re: Glock 19 is obsolete
« on: March 03, 2021, 12:53:17 PM »
Still a very capable handgun with a reliable design with low number of parts and strong aftermarket support vs something like the 1911 with tried/true design but many parts to go wrong.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 15