that's that guys opinion and you know what the saying is about opinions. Now here is mine I would think regardless of the firearm used in a defensive shooting here you'd be treated the same. Buy what you like or what you think you like if you don't like it sell it the main thing is you are happy and what you bought fits your own perception of right and your needs.
Unfortunately, not all self-/home-defense shootings are created equal. Nor are all judges, DAs and juries totally guided by logic and strict interpretation of the law.
First thing to consider: If involved in a shooting to defend your life or property, your firearm will be confiscated as evidence. So, ask yourself if you'd mind having a $500-$550 Glock in the evidence locker for months, if not years, or would you rather have your $2,000 Les Baer pistol sitting there with the property clerks eying it every time they are in the locker? I personally would rather be without the Glock than a more valuable and maybe more difficult to replace handgun.
Second thing: If all is cut and dried, and there is no question about the shooting being justified, then your life might get back to semi-normal quickly. But what if there are questions? What if you and the guy you shot knew each other? What if he was a coworker who decided to come by and start a fight over something silly at work? What if a neighbor gave a statement that contradicts your story? There is going to be an investigation, and perhaps even a trial -- or two if the family goes after money for wrongful death. So, now you are at trial. The prosecutor or plaintiff's lawyer will be trying everything to make you out to be a bad guy with a gun and an itchy trigger finger. Let's look at your gun's configuration. Is the trigger a stock 5+ lbs from the factory, or did you lighten up the trigger pull to 3 lbs? Did you add any decorations, like Punisher logos, Skull & Crossbones, or the name "Dillinger" on the slide? The lawyers will use that to show you could be a nutcase aching to pull that trigger for some dark reason, or maybe the 3 lb pull caused you to discharge the gun accidentally. Any doubt as to your intentions or skills using that gun works for them, and against you.
The last thing to consider is the "reputation" of your weapon of choice. Handguns are not really as big a problem as some rifles. AK-47s have been given a bad rap due to some events where the bad guys chose to use them for illegal shootings. The same can now be said for the AR-15 after Sandy Hook. If a burglar is shot with a Remington 700 hunting rifle, that's not as scary-sounding as you taking out your AK-47 and firing 3 rounds into him. Just the image of an AK may cause the jury to have an emotional response that hurts your case.
Your choice of defensive gun is mostly about reliable operation and effectiveness. However, once the shooting is over, it's also about impressions and stereotypes that many low-information-jurists might harbor about these guns they know nothing about. You could be setting yourself up for a steep uphill climb should you find yourself defending your actions in court. At some point, you'll be wondering why you didn't buy that Glock 17 like HPD uses!
Choosing Self Defense Gunshttp://www.armedcitizensnetwork.org/choosing-self-defense-guns