Interesting read, thanks for posting it. I like how the author went into the English history on the matter. The debate on a standing army is also an interesting one, especially when viewed in light of the current political climate, but that is another topic.
I had never seen this quote from George Washington before.
"Individuals entering into society, must give up a share of liberty to
preserve the rest. The magnitude of the sacrifice must (pg.1009) depend as well on situation and
circumstance, as on the object to be obtained."6
and
George Washington further stated, "It is at all times difficult to draw with precision the line between those rights which
must be surrendered, and those which may be preserved ...."
The proposed amendment from Pensylvania was interesting. It was broader in it's coverage but also left a small window for exceptions.
"That the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and their own State
or the United States, or for the purpose of killing game; and no law shall be passed
disarming the people or any of them unless for crimes committed, or real danger of public
injury from individuals.172"
This reminds me of an article I read once but can't seem to find right now, in which the author explains three ways to evaluate the 2nd amendment. One was by the plain language, one was by the intent of those who passed it and I forget the third. It made an interesting case, if I can find it again I will post it here.