Wal, ya know, that one of the guy in the tan strapless top and the ruffled "skorts" or whatever you want to call it, made me do a double take.
There, on his right leg, there appeared to be a portion of the male primary anatomical feature hanging out below the pretty ruffled hem of his pretty little skort.
Well, I enlarged it in MSPaint to check it out, and apparently it is just a patch of light.
What sensitized me to that kind of goofup was that about a dozen years ago there was a fire in one of our mountain communities and some folks got wiped out. Well, the local rag published a large front-page high-quality full-color picture of one of the victims sitting on a log wearing short shorts, petting his cat.
A ruckus was raised about that because it sure looked like one of his nut sacs was hanging out, and even with the most primitive image-enhancement, it was still more obvious that that was the case.
That brouhaha went on for weeks, with the paper vehemently denying (on-line) again and again, over and over, that it was the guy's right nut, and that it was just a patch of light on his thigh, but with literally (and I literally mean literally) hundreds of on-line readers insisting it was indeed the guy's right family jewel.
They even published (on-line) their enlargement of the area, and it was hilariously obvious that they had done their own hilariously inept "doctoring" to make it look like a patch of sunlight fell on the guy's thigh.
I captured a high-res screen shot of their original front page just for future laughs and I still have it. Buuuut, if I post it, I'm sure the paper would raise hell with me.
Terry, 230RN