Lindsay Clancy (Read 1235 times)

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #20 on: September 07, 2026, 03:31:49 PM »
Why is anyone surprised? All 9 women on the jury (and 2 likely feminist men) said she's not guilty of killing 3 children.

Quote
An estimated 1,126,000 abortions were provided by US clinicians in 2025, largely unchanged
from 2024, when there were 1,124,000 clinician-provided abortions, and an increase of 21%
from 2020, the last year of comprehensive national estimates before Dobbs This count includes
medication abortions provided via telemedicine by US clinicians, including those provided under
the protection of shield laws to patients in states with total bans. It does not include self-managed
abortions, such as those using medications mailed from pharmacies outside the United States or
sourced from community networks. Evidence suggests self-managed abortions have increased
since Dobbs.
Feminists have brainwashed their proponents into believing children are their property, and they are free to kill them if they want at any stage of pregnancy up to and including delivery. 

I would wager the women see this situation as a case of very late term abortion with the same lack of accountability as any other late tern abortion.

The lives of 3 children are not even a drop in the bucket compared to the > 1M babies killed every year.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

ren

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #21 on: September 07, 2026, 03:54:02 PM »
if children are women's property and men can get pregnant
Deeds Not Words

oldfart

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #22 on: September 08, 2026, 01:49:15 AM »
...and then you have a story like this in contrast...
From 2019. There are pictures of her on the web

======

Emma Schols, a Swedish mother of six, woke up in the middle of the night to find her home engulfed in flames. With no time to think and barefoot, she immediately ran into the burning house, first rescuing her two youngest sons and pushing them safely outside, even shielding them from the flames as she escaped with them. Despite the fire spreading rapidly through the home, she realized four of her children were still inside and repeatedly went back into the burning structure to reach them.

She climbed through intense smoke and fire-filled stairs, bringing each child out one by one until all six were safely outside. During the rescue, she suffered catastrophic burns over most of her body, but she refused to stop until every child was accounted for. All six children survived without injuries, and Emma later spent a long and difficult recovery in the hospital, ultimately becoming a symbol of extraordinary maternal courage and sacrifice.
What, Me Worry?

rpoL98

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #23 on: September 08, 2026, 06:25:40 AM »













« Last Edit: September 08, 2026, 07:33:37 PM by rpoL98 »

rpoL98

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #24 on: September 08, 2026, 07:32:50 PM »

























« Last Edit: September 09, 2026, 03:50:09 PM by rpoL98 »

oldfart

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #25 on: September 08, 2026, 08:49:26 PM »
As a dad and grand-dad who loves babies, I have a really hard time wrapping my head around this mess.
 :(
What, Me Worry?

zippz

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #26 on: September 08, 2026, 09:20:45 PM »
The jury, at least most of them, made the right decision with a not guilty.  Massachusetts insanity defense is the opposite of the rest of the nation.  The prosecutor has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she is not insane.  That's really hard to do with her prior history of mental illness.  Usually the defense would have to prove she was insane.

The mistrial works in her favor.  If the lone guy voted with the rest, the judge could lock her up in a mental facility for an indefinite period, possibly life.  Because it was a 11 to 1 mistrial, I doubt the prosecutor will choose to retry the case so she gets to go home.
« Last Edit: September 08, 2026, 09:25:49 PM by zippz »

hvybarrels

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #27 on: September 08, 2026, 10:51:56 PM »
I'd like to see the dad file a civil lawsuit for the doctors and drug companies that botched her treatment.

If the communists can sue gun manufacturers for mass shootings then the rest of us should be able to go after the pharma cartel for scrambling people's brains.
Never let anyone take away your freedom for "the greater good". Freedom is the greater good.

rpoL98

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #28 on: September 09, 2026, 04:12:48 AM »
The jury, at least most of them, made the right decision with a not guilty.  Massachusetts insanity defense is the opposite of the rest of the nation.  The prosecutor has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she is not insane.  That's really hard to do with her prior history of mental illness.  Usually the defense would have to prove she was insane.

The mistrial works in her favor.  If the lone guy voted with the rest, the judge could lock her up in a mental facility for an indefinite period, possibly life.  Because it was a 11 to 1 mistrial, I doubt the prosecutor will choose to retry the case so she gets to go home.



wow, informative.  That is so F'd up.  I wonder if that alternate-universe mentality has its' historical origins in the Salem witch trials (I'm being facetious).  It is warped.  But then, it is Massachusetts. 





« Last Edit: September 09, 2026, 03:46:53 PM by rpoL98 »

QUIETShooter

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #29 on: September 09, 2026, 08:07:59 AM »
All this legal hulla balloo and crap about legalities and whatever-ities doesn't change the fact:

Innocent children are dead.

Mind-boggling what humans are capable of doing.  Good or Bad.
Sometimes you gotta know when to save your bullets.

Westside_Redneck

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #30 on: September 10, 2026, 12:45:00 PM »
I'd like to see the dad file a civil lawsuit for the doctors and drug companies that botched her treatment.

If the communists can sue gun manufacturers for mass shootings then the rest of us should be able to go after the pharma cartel for scrambling people's brains.

100%

If you recognize patterns with every mass shooting event, all the kids that got "treatment via SSRIs" all became homicidal maniacs, picked up whatever gun they could get their mitts on and killed people.
It's the SSRIs that are killing people, not the guns! I would wager that gun control groups have been running cover for big pharma over the last 30+ years (marxist gun control is only a net positive for the spineless asshats who have the pharma cartel's hands in their pockets and @$$hol3$)!

I wouldn't be surprised at all, if this is just another example of SSRI's making broken people into murderers! The difference is, this is the feminist edition because I guarantee you this p^$$y and her husband didn't have access to weapons nor did she know anyone with an illegal arm to sell.

ren

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #31 on: September 10, 2026, 07:15:59 PM »


Deeds Not Words

oldfart

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #32 on: September 10, 2026, 08:36:39 PM »
Wtf is wrong with people nowadays?
What, Me Worry?

hvybarrels

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #33 on: September 10, 2026, 09:17:13 PM »


Never let anyone take away your freedom for "the greater good". Freedom is the greater good.

oldfart

Re: Lindsay Clancy
« Reply #34 on: September 10, 2026, 11:57:00 PM »
I use the pecking bird hand gesture every day.
It's used to pick up the poop that my Dawgs drop.
What, Me Worry?

ren

« Last Edit: Today at 07:25:27 AM by ren »
Deeds Not Words