Ridiculous. 
It’s already been mentioned that cops have shot kids who were holding all black toy guns. Just do a google search or a YouTube search and you’ll find anecdotal examples.
I hope it doesn’t come to the point where orange tipped Nerf guns would be considered a possible gun by cops. That would suck for all kids who enjoy playing toy guns.
Anyway, I don’t want to argue with you on this.
You have every right to hold views of an anarchist. If you’re just being argumentative, then that’s another story.
Why don't you just answer the questions? You not only won't state clearly what your hypothesis is for why you dubbed the original photo/general idea as "stupid" or "dumb", but then rather than answer the questions that would naturally arise from your comments and explain your position clearly, and provide supporting evidence for your positions, and how those policy positions differ from the people who want to ban and/or restrict other Second Amendment rights. You resorting to labeling someone or the questions asked as "ridiculous" or an "anarchist" rather than simply answering them makes one wonder why you don't just clearly state your views? (How many times have we seen in the past week people stating that "An 18 year old being able to buy an AR15 is ridiculous!"?) Do you or don't support the elimination of all toy guns (including "air soft", etc. as well as those such as in the photo)? If not why not, given the harm that has come to various individuals through law enforcement misapprehension of those toys as "real" guns?
I see you've edited your original response.
There are examples of criminals painting an orange tip on a real gun, so that horse is already out of the barn, that's why I asked if you support the banning of all toy guns, since there is already no way for anyone to tell at any distance if a gun is real or toy. That was the point of the original article which linked to the effort to have parents "influence" their kids to turn in their toy guns. You seem to be an advocate of "gun play", so I suspect you are against such efforts, but I don't see how that's consistent with your condemnation of the alteration of a real firearm and the consequences you claim derive from that. If no kids had any toy guns, it would clarify any situation were a gun was pointed at someone no matter what it looked like.
What you write is logically inconsistent. You have every right to hold views that are logically inconsistent.