- Mark Meadows, who is involved in a probe into the Clinton Foundation, says three people have come forward with hundreds of pages of potential evidence
- Says they hint at a misuse of funds and quid-pro-quo promises made to donors
- It was also revealed that another whistleblower gave 6,000 pages to the FBI
- Investigative hearing will take place in the House of Representatives next week

Hope they have good life insurance policies!

were jogging and accidentally fell into the road and got hit by a truck even though they had never exercised a day before in their lives...

So?
Democrat politicians are "special" they don't have to conform to laws like the rest of us.

The House Oversight Subcommittee on Government Operations held a hearing on Capitol Hill Thursday on the
Clinton Foundation.

Mark Meadows (R-NC), the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Government Operations, led the hearing today.
Two Clinton Foundation whistleblowers spoke at the hearing today. And Tom Fitton from Judicial Watch also testified.

Meadows told the audience today at the beginning of the hearing that the Department of Justice was unwilling to
make John Huber available for the hearing today.

Huber was assigned months ago by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to investigate several controversies about
Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation.

Witness John Moynihan and witness Doyle accused the Clinton Foundation of using funding in the Clinton Health Initiative
for trips, expenditures for personal use.

The witnesses told the committee today they had to send their evidence to the Huber investigation THREE TIMES
because they kept losing it.

What the hell is going on with this Huber investigation?

The Huber investigative team suddenly became interested in the evidence when they heard the two men were going
before Congress today.

Rep. Meadows: Why do you think Mr. Huber waited until November 30th to call you about 4 letters you had sent prior?

Mr. Moynihan: I don’t know.

Rep. Meadows: Do you think it might have had to do with you coming here to testify?… They were fully aware because
we had asked them to come and be a witness at this particular hearing. Then all of the sudden you get a phone call from
what, Mr. Huber’s second in command. Is that correct?

Mr. Moynihan: He was clearly the assistant US Attorney dealing directly with Mr. Huber.

Rep. Meadows: Well I find it just very coincidental that on November 30th, a few days before the hearing, after we notified
them that we wanted them to come testify that all of the sudden they would start following up. So Mr. Doyle what did they
say about the documents that you had provided them?

They lost the first two set of documents that were sent to them.

Rep. Meadows: So you’re telling me that on November 30th they called you back and they couldn’t find the first two submissions
you had made to the Department of Justice and Mr. Huber? That they wanted you to send them again? That’s what you’re telling me?

Mr. Doyle: We’re concluding that ourselves. That’s what we’re concluding.