trending: #tulsicoward (Read 1712 times)

macsak

groveler

Re: trending: #tulsicoward
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2019, 11:01:11 AM »
Good posting!
It dramatically shows how the Democrat party works.
The party will book no dissent from the party line.  "Present" was not a dissent!
She voted "Yea" on one of the articles of Impeachment, just not both.
It looks like the Democrat for eternity 2nd district seat will be filled by Kehele,
a true Party liner.  I don't look forward to him being a Congress critter.
But hey everybody runs to Honolulu to get money for elections.  It seems
like only Union Democrats bother to vote, so the tyranny rolls on!
You know the Democrat party governs, Democrat Unions elect Democrats.
and the Union gets fat Government contracts, it is the Democrat way!


Flapp_Jackson

Re: trending: #tulsicoward
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2019, 11:22:27 AM »
Twitter is not reality.  Fear of hashtag bullies is stupid.  Nobody who matters cares about hashtags on Twitter.

Tulsi effortlessly turned the news cycle to her own advantage.  If she'd qualified for the debate this week, it would have been a great week for her campaign.

Since she's not running to keep her House seat, the DNC can't threaten her with being "primaried", which was the tactic they used to keep the Dems in Trump-supporting districts in line and coerce their "yes" votes.

I liked her response to the question about how this non-vote might influence her Democrat base.  She seems to be as tired of the tribalism and divided political landscape as most of us are. 

Leadership is not marching in lockstep with your party.  It's having the courage to actually do what the Dems only give lip service to:  VOTE YOUR CONSCIENCE.

Her "present" vote also represented Hawaii well, as opposed to the other House member who blindly parroted the Dem talking points.  Any logical, intelligent person knows the impeachment vote was based on nothing more than a promise to impeach Trump if the voters turned out and gave the Dems a majority.

Thank goodness they didn't get the Senate, too.

The main criticism I have is she said, "I think Trump is guilty of wrongdoing."  Wrongdoing?   :wtf:  Impeachment requires that he be proven guilty of a crime against the nation.  Maybe he's done something wrong, but unless the "wrongdoings" are the basis of the articles of impeachment, her belief is irrelevant.  I'd rather she stated he was guilty of "abuse of power" or "obstruction of Congress", just to be clearer.  But, she left it up to interpretation by implying he was guilty of the charges made by the House.

She may have chosen those words to avoid pissing off the entire party by admitting the articles of impeachment were unsupported by the evidence presented.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

drck1000

Re: trending: #tulsicoward
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2019, 11:30:29 AM »
#notmyrep

zippz

Re: trending: #tulsicoward
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2019, 03:24:59 PM »
She did the right thing and I'm proud she did that.  She voted present on both articles not one.  Her response on why she voted present is even better than her vote.  Would've been better if she voted no, but there is a case that Trump shouldn't have brought up Biden's name and instead should've just gone after general corruption in Ukraine.  Now she has to do the right thing about gun rights.

She's probably leaning more towards an independent run.  She may take more votes from Trump than Biden.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: trending: #tulsicoward
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2019, 06:06:30 PM »
She did the right thing and I'm proud she did that.  She voted present on both articles not one.  Her response on why she voted present is even better than her vote.  Would've been better if she voted no, but there is a case that Trump shouldn't have brought up Biden's name and instead should've just gone after general corruption in Ukraine.  Now she has to do the right thing about gun rights.

She's probably leaning more towards an independent run.  She may take more votes from Trump than Biden.

If the corruption involves Biden and his son, the President has every right to ask Ukraine to look into it.

Saying Biden is off limits because he's "Trump's political rival" assumes: (1) Biden will be the nominee, and (2) Trump thinks he needs to involve Ukraine to help beat Biden.

Neither assumption is correct.  Biden might be polling higher, but he's not a serious opponent for Trump.  Biden has too many other problems other than his son to be a threat to Trump's reelection.

I don't think Trump is going to look for "dirt" on any of the DNC candidates before the winner is nominated.  If we were already at that stage, MAYBE I could see the argument.

If a president can't investigate anyone running for President, maybe someone should have told Obama.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw