. (Read 7120 times)

Q

.
« on: November 20, 2013, 02:49:47 PM »
.
« Last Edit: October 11, 2016, 12:26:02 AM by Q »

2aHawaii

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3629
  • Total likes: 67
  • Sheepdog
  • Referrals: 17
    • View Profile
    • 2aHawaii
Re: I think they took note of Hawaii.
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2013, 03:11:02 PM »
Quote
"It's not so much a safety issue. It's a social conflict issue," said Frank Jenks, a natural resource specialist with Interior's Bureau of Land Management, which oversees 245 million acres. He adds that urbanites "freak out" when they hear shooting on public lands.

I "freak out" when I hear stories about things like this happening, or with new restrictions are being proposed. Obviously they need to stop doing that and hurting my feelings.
I am not a lawyer.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." - United States Constitution Amendment 2 & Hawaii State Constitution Article 1 Section 17

Buying from Amazon? Click through here

bass monkey

Re: I think they took note of Hawaii.
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2013, 04:23:43 PM »
What "note" did they take from Hawaii?

kekoa

Re: I think they took note of Hawaii.
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2013, 05:49:28 PM »
I "freak out" when I hear stories about things like this happening, or with new restrictions are being proposed. Obviously they need to stop doing that and hurting my feelings.

You know what this really comes down to is that America is becoming a pussyfied nation. If anything bothers or hurts the feeling of these pussyfied liberal pukes the first option is to ban it. Duck Fat  chet.

Q

.
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2013, 06:16:02 PM »
.
« Last Edit: October 11, 2016, 12:26:09 AM by Q »

pastordennis

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 349
  • Total likes: 0
  • Isaiah 55:11
  • Referrals: 1
    • View Profile
Re: I think they took note of Hawaii.
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2013, 08:26:08 PM »
This really is pissing me off. Liberals are more than ready to LIE just to achieve their goal. They are enlightened and we are stupid.

punaperson

Re: I think they took note of Hawaii.
« Reply #6 on: November 21, 2013, 06:50:02 AM »
http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2011/11/16/obama-pushing-shooters-off-public-lands
As an aside, I clicked on the "Gun Control Cartoons" on the page with the above article. There are 138 cartoons. I only looked at the first 25. Of those, 24 are "pro more gun control", and only one, by Michael Ramirez, presents another side to the argument.

24 to 1. Ironically the same ratio as Democrats to Republicans in the Hawaii State Senate.  :wtf:

oldfart

Re: I think they took note of Hawaii.
« Reply #7 on: November 21, 2013, 09:24:26 AM »
You know what this really comes down to is that America is becoming a pussyfied nation. If anything bothers or hurts the feeling of these pussyfied liberal pukes the first option is to ban it. Duck Fat  chet.
=================
I like the term "wussification" myself.
If you build your house next to a chicken farm, don't complain about the roosters crowing or the smell of chickenshit.
Damn urbanites.
What, Me Worry?

spanner1751

Re: I think they took note of Hawaii.
« Reply #8 on: November 23, 2013, 09:05:08 PM »
This really is pissing me off. Liberals are more than ready to LIE just to achieve their goal. They are enlightened and we are stupid.

The majority of Americans are seriously lacking in critical thinking skills, and just believe everything they hear on the MSM, IMHO.

punaperson

Re: I think they took note of Hawaii.
« Reply #9 on: November 24, 2013, 06:48:44 AM »
The majority of Americans are seriously lacking in critical thinking skills, and just believe everything they hear on the MSM, IMHO.
I'm guessing that if you asked Americans about their "critical thinking skills" a substantial portion would respond "Whaddya mean?", IMHO.
 :shaka:

kekoa

Re: I think they took note of Hawaii.
« Reply #10 on: November 25, 2013, 04:47:40 AM »
I'm guessing that if you asked Americans about their "critical thinking skills" a substantial portion would respond "Whaddya mean?", IMHO.
 :shaka:

no the would just say, "baaaaaaaabaaaaaaaaaabaaaaaaaa" like the rest of the liberal puke sheep.

passivekinetic

Re: I think they took note of Hawaii.
« Reply #11 on: November 25, 2013, 07:36:49 AM »
No, they would just be critical of thinking.
"The sheep fear sheepdogs, because they fail to see the wolves."
- Anonymous

230RN

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1529
  • Total likes: 71
  • But they're [u]supposed[/u] to be military-style!
  • Referrals: 2
    • View Profile
Re: I think they took note of Hawaii.
« Reply #12 on: November 28, 2013, 04:13:32 AM »
This nibbling away at closing shooting areas started a long time ago with piece-by-piece closures of large areas to shooting sports by declaring them "primitive areas," "refuges," "national monuments," "parks" and the like.

I don't know if Clinton started this technique to "choke off" the opportunities to shoot in vast areas, but that was when I first started to notice it.  I bitched about it here and there when I could, including at the beginning of the internet era, but nobody seemed to care much,  "Ooo, more parks, more primitive areas for the birdwatchers and day hikers.... yay!" was the attitude I kept running up against.

The gun community did not seem to notice this trend, apparently   "Colorado has umpteen million acres of National Forest --how could they take that away?"

After all, the Forests are, by law, "multi-use" areas... which includes free-range shooting and hunting.

Well, now you see the results of this gradual choking off of shooting opportunities.  They decided to try to go whole hog.

Yay for the nature photographers and birdwatchers.

And screw us.

Terry, 230RN
I do believe that the radical and crazy notion that the Founders meant what they said, is gradually soaking through the judicial system.

bass monkey

Re: I think they took note of Hawaii.
« Reply #13 on: November 28, 2013, 05:26:50 AM »
This nibbling away at closing shooting areas started a long time ago with piece-by-piece closures of large areas to shooting sports by declaring them "primitive areas," "refuges," "national monuments," "parks" and the like.

I don't know if Clinton started this technique to "choke off" the opportunities to shoot in vast areas, but that was when I first started to notice it.  I bitched about it here and there when I could, including at the beginning of the internet era, but nobody seemed to care much,  "Ooo, more parks, more primitive areas for the birdwatchers and day hikers.... yay!" was the attitude I kept running up against.

The gun community did not seem to notice this trend, apparently   "Colorado has umpteen million acres of National Forest --how could they take that away?"

After all, the Forests are, by law, "multi-use" areas... which includes free-range shooting and hunting.

Well, now you see the results of this gradual choking off of shooting opportunities.  They decided to try to go whole hog.

Yay for the nature photographers and birdwatchers.

And screw us.

Terry, 230RN

I know what you mean.  I work conservation here and its a very thin line agencies/groups have to thread between everyone that wants/needs access to the forest, especially living on an island.