Rosevelt Shooting (Read 53895 times)

bubba808

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #100 on: February 09, 2014, 09:22:19 AM »
Whoa whoa whoa.....    Nope that is not respect,  You got that all wrong there bud.
was I talking to you? What is your definition of respecting someones opinion?

 "people who challenge others OPINIONS are irratting fks."  What is wrong with this here?  If you cannot back your opinions with reason then you might as well be a liberal gun grabber that uses pure illogical emotion to twist and spin the truth to bend people's ideas on the evilness of guns.  People who challenge either do not understand "others OPINIONS" and wish to understand better,  Which is NOT " irratting fks",  Or Disagree with "others OPINIONS",  in which case alternate ideas are exchanged and discussed, there by, a mutual understanding can either be reached or a mutual agreement to agree to disagree can be met.   Which is ALSO NOT " irratting fks".
My post was directed SPECIFICALLY toward hicarry.  BUT irratating fks, like you, like butt in so... go re-read what I wrote.   And sometimes people who challenge also try to push their agendas or point of view too much and alter others opinion until it is like their own instead of agreeing to disagree which im MY opinion is the threshold for irratating.  Let me clarify for you, i said you can try to share your opinion, but when it becomes obvious that it is not working then theres a point where you agree to disagree.  It is clear if you read the mutha fkn 6 pages of posts... that braddah kekoa has told braddah hicarry enough and move on.  (I.e. agree to disagree) but da guy keep going... and thats irratating.  If you still dont get it, im am notifying you of my opinion and I disagree with you, lets not discuss further. 

bubba808

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #101 on: February 09, 2014, 09:27:00 AM »
I'm at  bench 80...  I would love to meet you
Im in Kalihi, and id love to meet you too, no homo.

bubba808

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #102 on: February 09, 2014, 09:30:54 AM »
Here is one person's opinion:
"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing." - Adolf Hitler

People can agree or disagree with your opinion. Accept it with serenity. Take the feedback as a source of validity to your argument and be honest with yourself.
thats deep bu.  Just like the shit in this thread.  Pretty soon im gonna need a snorkel. LoL

ImKu

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #103 on: February 09, 2014, 09:37:50 AM »
Im in Kalihi, and id love to meet you too, no homo.

 Alright,  I've used up my shit talkin for the day...  this made me laugh though.   I'm sure we'll cross paths sometime.   Until then  :shaka:
The mind acts like an enemy for those who do not control it.
- Bhagavad Gita

Kingkeoni

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #104 on: February 09, 2014, 10:31:52 AM »
Alright,  I've used up my shit talkin for the day...  this made me laugh though.   I'm sure we'll cross paths sometime.   Until then  :shaka:

It's ok to cross paths as long as you don't cross swords
Your number one Option for Personal Security is a lifelong commitment to avoidance, deterrence, and de-escalation.

Someday someone may kill you with your own gun, but they should have to beat you to death with it because it is empty.

kekoa

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #105 on: February 09, 2014, 10:52:58 AM »
Whoa whoa whoa.....    Nope that is not respect,  You got that all wrong there bud.

 "people who challenge others OPINIONS are irratting fks."  What is wrong with this here?  If you cannot back your opinions with reason then you might as well be a liberal gun grabber that uses pure illogical emotion to twist and spin the truth to bend people's ideas on the evilness of guns.  People who challenge either do not understand "others OPINIONS" and wish to understand better,  Which is NOT " irratting fks",  Or Disagree with "others OPINIONS",  in which case alternate ideas are exchanged and discussed, there by, a mutual understanding can either be reached or a mutual agreement to agree to disagree can be met.   Which is ALSO NOT " irratting fks".

The point of a discussion is to state opinions and ideas, provide guidance and advice, and/or debate said ideas or advice.  Name calling and other trolling that does not add any useful input into the discussion does not grow any part of the point of the discussion.  Name calling is no way to win a debate, only retort with facts can achieve that.  Other wise, agree to disagree and leave it at that.

I see you got all the inter jargon down fine, good for you. waaaawaaaawaaaa.

Funtimes

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #106 on: February 09, 2014, 10:54:05 AM »
Grammer police and people who challenge others OPINIONS are irratting fks.

Ever thought about how grammar and the way you construct your sentences may impact on what people read?  After all, a forum is about words and putting them to digital format.  The guys statement read a specific way.  He may have not meant it in that fashion, but his words don't back it up.
Check out the Hawaii Defense Foundation.
HDF on Facebook
Defender of the Accused in Arkansas Courts
Posts are not legal advice & are my own, unless said so.

kekoa

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #107 on: February 09, 2014, 11:01:45 AM »
Here is one person's opinion:
"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing." - Adolf Hitler

People can agree or disagree with your opinion. Accept it with serenity. Take the feedback as a source of validity to your argument and be honest with yourself.

agree and disagree is one thing. completely twisting things into something not even related to the intended comments is not fair or right. the point of debate is to stay on the topic of debate not juxtapose it with a completely separate dialogue to attempt to cause one to espouse your beliefs or create a jumping platform for your agenda.

Darmok and Jalad @Tanagra

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #108 on: February 09, 2014, 11:20:28 AM »
 :popcorn:     :popcorn:       :popcorn:      :popcorn:      :popcorn:     

I brought extra  ... Q likes popcorn!   :rofl:
"... the right to be let alone -- the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men."
--Justice Louis D. Brandeis

kekoa

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #109 on: February 09, 2014, 11:22:15 AM »
Ever thought about how grammar and the way you construct your sentences may impact on what people read?  After all, a forum is about words and putting them to digital format.  The guys statement read a specific way.  He may have not meant it in that fashion, but his words don't back it up.

Ok Fun read this:
Nailed it Ren!! Yes there are bad cops and we just have to trust the system will find them and take care of them, but I am certain there are far more that are good and mean well all the time. These guys deal with the worst of society everyday, as far as to the possibility of not coming home from work…ever. You pull a knife on a cop and use it you deserve to be shot. You disobey an order of compliance from an officer you probably are up to no good anyway. If your not up to no good you settle with the PD and be done.

By the way I am no cop, I do however believe it the standards and norms of a grounded stable society and if we need police that enforce rules and laws to maintain that I say do it.

And this:
So to spell it out for you, cause apparently you cannot determine it yourself, the contact with LE  that I am speaking of would be one brought on due to some sort of criminal act or intent of a crime by a particular individual(s). GET IT???!!! Your freaking kidding me if your really think I would ever think it was OK to have LE just willy nilly stop an individual. There seems to be a great disconnect to the understanding that I never said anything about random unwarranted contacts with PD as related to the decision by the young man that chose to bring a PD contact on himself at Rosevelt High School.


All comments to spell it out for you grammatically inept individuals (2). How the F+++ does this impart anything you and your pal seem think it means. Pathetic. Bold, italic and underlined just so you can actually see it.

bubba808

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #110 on: February 09, 2014, 11:22:45 AM »
Ever thought about how grammar and the way you construct your sentences has a significant impact on what people read?  After all, a forum is about words and putting them to digital format.
actually, I have but obviously im not a lawyer type.  You ever thought about this forum being 2A"Hawaii" and consider that locals communicate via a modified form of english based on the region and diverse cultures that reside here in the islands?

ren

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #111 on: February 09, 2014, 12:02:48 PM »
actually, I have but obviously im not a lawyer type.  You ever thought about this forum being 2A"Hawaii" and consider that locals communicate via a modified form of english based on the region and diverse cultures that reside here in the islands?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/da/Wallace_R._Farrington,_G._G._Bain_photo_portrait.jpg


** Removed IMG tag; the picture is huge! ** - Funtimes
« Last Edit: February 09, 2014, 01:30:25 PM by Funtimes »
Deeds Not Words

bubba808

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #112 on: February 09, 2014, 12:10:40 PM »
uncle wally knows, cuz its what is taught in his school.
Ren, did you learn something different there? Be honest.



** removed huge picture **: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/da/Wallace_R._Farrington,_G._G._Bain_photo_portrait.jpg - Funtimes
« Last Edit: February 09, 2014, 01:29:42 PM by Funtimes »

Darmok and Jalad @Tanagra

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #113 on: February 09, 2014, 12:11:24 PM »
Anybody hear about a police shooting at Roosevelt High School?    :rofl:
« Last Edit: February 09, 2014, 01:34:55 PM by Darmok and Jalad @Tanagra »
"... the right to be let alone -- the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men."
--Justice Louis D. Brandeis

macsak

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #114 on: February 09, 2014, 12:24:22 PM »


ren, your picture is a little small
could you please make it a little bigger?

bubba808

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #115 on: February 09, 2014, 12:38:12 PM »


 :shaka:

kekoa

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #116 on: February 09, 2014, 12:56:31 PM »

Funtimes

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #117 on: February 09, 2014, 01:31:01 PM »
Edited some of those posts to remove that huge, huge picture.  Posting to tech b/c I couldn't resize them with BB code.  :(

Going to explore what options we have and if we can resize the images in some sort of fashion.  :stopjack:
Check out the Hawaii Defense Foundation.
HDF on Facebook
Defender of the Accused in Arkansas Courts
Posts are not legal advice & are my own, unless said so.

Funtimes

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #118 on: February 09, 2014, 01:52:11 PM »
All comments to spell it out for you grammatically inept individuals (2). How the F+++ does this impart anything you and your pal seem think it means. Pathetic. Bold, italic and underlined just so you can actually see it.

You are quite amusing.  You get upset because people read what you wrote, but what you wrote doesn't mean what you wanted it to.  And, we are the ones to blame? #facepalm 

More importantly, instead of just saying, "Hey, that is not what I meant," in a respectful and professional tone, you rant and pounded out insults like a 10 year old.  You accused people of being "radicalized, militant and. [sic] anti LE [sic]." Then, you further went to call this a "radicalized anti government [sic] LE forum." And, then, you tried to say he was creating "controversy out of nothing," which was clearly not the case, because other individuals, including myself, read your statements in the same light.

You even further went to state the following:
 "Why is it so hard to allow a contact whether right or wrong to be cleared up clearly by PD and then be on your way"; and,
"I understand the fine line of details we are talking about here, but, if you are doing no wrong it will be cleared up and be done with."

Your statement demonstrates, rather clearly I might add, that you are of the opinion that even if you aren't doing wrong it is alright for the police to stop you for their contact until the situation is "cleared up."  HiCarry simply disagrees with your statement and pointed out why; I agree with him and believe his response to be both logical and legally correct, because the police do not just get to stop you for no reason and seize you until it is "cleared up."


.
Check out the Hawaii Defense Foundation.
HDF on Facebook
Defender of the Accused in Arkansas Courts
Posts are not legal advice & are my own, unless said so.

Funtimes

Re: Rosevelt Shooting
« Reply #119 on: February 09, 2014, 01:59:18 PM »
actually, I have but obviously im not a lawyer type.  You ever thought about this forum being 2A"Hawaii" and consider that locals communicate via a modified form of english based on the region and diverse cultures that reside here in the islands?

Don't make excuses.  You are perfectly capable of writing a clear and concise statement.  Saying stuff like this discredits the people of Hawaii who are, in my experience generally, thoughtful, respectful, and very intelligent (politicians excepted). 
« Last Edit: February 09, 2014, 02:06:27 PM by Funtimes »
Check out the Hawaii Defense Foundation.
HDF on Facebook
Defender of the Accused in Arkansas Courts
Posts are not legal advice & are my own, unless said so.