He didn't get shot! (Read 20288 times)

mauidog

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #20 on: September 18, 2014, 12:51:57 PM »
so whats ur point. king says that cops shouldnt use their guns and should beef all criminals. all po's who uses guns are whimps. screw that. also what does it matter how you get a criminal off the streets as long as they off it. id prefer they say off of it for good.

That's a great sentiment when the suspect is in fact a criminal.

What would you say if the same treatment were given to someone the police mistook for the suspect?   

Ooopsie?   :oops:

There is a little thing called due process.  You are supposed to be innocent until the system finds you guilty.  It sounds like you are advocating street justice.
An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it.   -- Jeff Cooper

llort

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #21 on: September 18, 2014, 01:18:38 PM »
That's a great sentiment when the suspect is in fact a criminal.

What would you say if the same treatment were given to someone the police mistook for the suspect?   

Ooopsie?   :oops:

There is a little thing called due process.  You are supposed to be innocent until the system finds you guilty.  It sounds like you are advocating street justice.

what u talking about what if they mistook someone else for the suspect . this was no mistake. this was definently a criminal as he tried to kill the cops. how can they get the wrong person. " Atiz revved the engine and tried to run down the officers.  They had to jump out of the way." " A third officer was injured jumping out of the way of the car." btw,  "he was arrested for attempted murder, assault, resisting arrest, and numerous traffic violations."

"What if"  "What if"  "What if"  "What if"  "What if"  "What if"
 :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:

Oh ok you innocent if you try to run down officers and then fight the officers causing injury to all three of them. nobody here said anything about advocating street justice, just shoot in self defense when their life was in extreme danger which was the car incident.

Oh so now you want ur so called due process when you stated that judicial system needs to be focused on and will just allow them back on the streets. make up ur mind. you want criminals on or off the streets. you sticking up for criminal rights?

BUD

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #22 on: September 18, 2014, 02:33:30 PM »
what u talking about what if they mistook someone else for the suspect . this was no mistake. this was definently a criminal as he tried to kill the cops. how can they get the wrong person. " Atiz revved the engine and tried to run down the officers.  They had to jump out of the way." " A third officer was injured jumping out of the way of the car." btw,  "he was arrested for attempted murder, assault, resisting arrest, and numerous traffic violations."

"What if"  "What if"  "What if"  "What if"  "What if"  "What if"
 :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:

Oh ok you innocent if you try to run down officers and then fight the officers causing injury to all three of them. nobody here said anything about advocating street justice, just shoot in self defense when their life was in extreme danger which was the car incident.

Oh so now you want ur so called due process when you stated that judicial system needs to be focused on and will just allow them back on the streets. make up ur mind. you want criminals on or off the streets. you sticking up for criminal rights?

Bahahaha.  This guy reminds me of that other ho guy.  Could this be TROLLHO?   :popcorn:
It is what it is.

edster48

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #23 on: September 18, 2014, 06:08:23 PM »
so whats ur point. king says that cops shouldnt use their guns and should beef all criminals. all po's who uses guns are whimps. screw that. also what does it matter how you get a criminal off the streets as long as they off it. id prefer they say off of it for good.

Always be yourself.
Unless you can be a pirate.
Then always be a pirate.

Kingkeoni

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #24 on: September 18, 2014, 06:16:48 PM »
So you sayin that po's who use their guns for self defense are whimps? this is a gun forum and prob over half bought guns for self defense so we dont have to fight them. you sayin we all cowards?

If the shoe fits...

so whats ur point. king says that cops shouldnt use their guns and should beef all criminals. all po's who uses guns are whimps. screw that. also what does it matter how you get a criminal off the streets as long as they off it. id prefer they say off of it for good.

Your excellent grammar leads me to believe you are a highly educated man, so I'll articulate this as well as my public school education allows.

My point is that wimps shouldn't be police officers.

There is a time to use deadly force.

There is a time to use physical force.

If you are a police officer, your primary concern should be the protection and preservation of life. If it's not, you're in the wrong line of work. Plain and simple.
Your number one Option for Personal Security is a lifelong commitment to avoidance, deterrence, and de-escalation.

Someday someone may kill you with your own gun, but they should have to beat you to death with it because it is empty.

mauidog

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #25 on: September 18, 2014, 10:26:02 PM »
what u talking about what if they mistook someone else for the suspect . this was no mistake. this was definently a criminal as he tried to kill the cops. how can they get the wrong person. " Atiz revved the engine and tried to run down the officers.  They had to jump out of the way." " A third officer was injured jumping out of the way of the car." btw,  "he was arrested for attempted murder, assault, resisting arrest, and numerous traffic violations."

"What if"  "What if"  "What if"  "What if"  "What if"  "What if"
 :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:

Oh ok you innocent if you try to run down officers and then fight the officers causing injury to all three of them. nobody here said anything about advocating street justice, just shoot in self defense when their life was in extreme danger which was the car incident.

Oh so now you want ur so called due process when you stated that judicial system needs to be focused on and will just allow them back on the streets. make up ur mind. you want criminals on or off the streets. you sticking up for criminal rights?

Why do you keep flip flopping between this specific case and then criminals in general?  You weren't just talking about this one criminal.  You were talking about all suspects:

Quote
also what does it matter how you get a criminal off the streets as long as they off it. id prefer they say off of it for good.

Try to focus.  I realize jumping around from this scenario to another helps your arguments sound like they make sense, but that's not even close to the truth!

I'm sticking up for the rights of everyone being allowed to survive a police encounter long enough to defend themselves in court.  Obviously by your statement above, you prefer the shoot 'em dead first, avoid questions later method of law enforcement regardless of the suspected crime.

 :wtf:
An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it.   -- Jeff Cooper

llort

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #26 on: September 19, 2014, 12:14:46 AM »
If the shoe fits...

Your excellent grammar leads me to believe you are a highly educated man, so I'll articulate this as well as my public school education allows.

My point is that wimps shouldn't be police officers.

There is a time to use deadly force.

There is a time to use physical force.

If you are a police officer, your primary concern should be the protection and preservation of life. If it's not, you're in the wrong line of work. Plain and simple.

its a subject that we disagree on. no need to get personal. no need sick ur dog on me. ill just end it right here bro  :shaka:

llort

dafrtknocker

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #28 on: September 21, 2014, 05:34:18 PM »
Another Police Officer hit by a car thief, they must watch the news and know the cops aren't going to shoot because of bad press.

 http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/20140921_Accident_in_Punchbowl_area_involved_police_car.html?id=275932381

llort

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #29 on: September 21, 2014, 05:45:57 PM »
i guess he tried to fight but lost   ::)

edster48

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #30 on: September 21, 2014, 07:40:07 PM »
Another Police Officer hit by a car thief, they must watch the news and know the cops aren't going to shoot because of bad press.

 http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/20140921_Accident_in_Punchbowl_area_involved_police_car.html?id=275932381

I'm starting to see a pattern here. What I'm noticing is the lack of Blue and Whites, you know, standard police cruisers.

I saw coverage of this on the evening news as well. What I saw was a lot of relatively new, highly polished, taxpayer subsidized personal vehicles, but very few Blue and Whites.

It would seem to me that utilizing 2-3 police cruisers to block in someone driving a stolen car makes more sense than putting your flesh and bone body in front of one and risking death or injury. I'm not saying it's easy, but in lieu of the fact that the drivers of these stolen cars seem to be willing to risk an attempted murder charge to escape capture, it just makes more sense to me.

I know this sounds crazy, but, is the reason they're not doing this because they don't want to damage their cars?

If the officer involved here had time to pull over the vehicle, she { in this instance } had time to call in some backup to assist in keeping the vehicle from escaping before she initiated the stop. Why not wait until the vehicle is immobilized before attempting to arrest the driver?

Am I missing something here?
Always be yourself.
Unless you can be a pirate.
Then always be a pirate.

Kingkeoni

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #31 on: September 22, 2014, 04:22:38 AM »

I know this sounds crazy, but, is the reason they're not doing this because they don't want to damage their cars?

If the officer involved here had time to pull over the vehicle, she { in this instance } had time to call in some backup to assist in keeping the vehicle from escaping before she initiated the stop. Why not wait until the vehicle is immobilized before attempting to arrest the driver?

Am I missing something here?

So Edster, you're advocating intelligent police work?

You're trying to tell us that a 3500 pound vehicle would be better at stopping a criminals car than a 155 pound police officer?

Aaaah come on.
Your number one Option for Personal Security is a lifelong commitment to avoidance, deterrence, and de-escalation.

Someday someone may kill you with your own gun, but they should have to beat you to death with it because it is empty.

Jl808

He didn't get shot!
« Reply #32 on: September 22, 2014, 06:32:11 AM »
Seems the police officer got hurt attempting to stop the car thief.

Officer injured in Honolulu hit-and-run crash: http://www.kitv.com/news/officer-injured-in-honolulu-hitandrun-crash/28177418

Quote
A Honolulu police officer is recovering from a hit-and-run crash near Lusitana Street and South School Street Sunday morning.

It happened at around 2:30 a.m., according to Emergency Medical Services officials.

Police say the officer took down the license plate of the car and discovered it was stolen.  The officer proceeded to pull over the car, but the driver hit the officer's car.

The stolen car was last seen heading down School Street.

The 30-year-old male officer was taken to the hospital in critical condition.

No word yet on the description of the car police are searching for.

I think, therefore I am armed.
NRA Life Patron member, HRA Life member, HiFiCo Life Member, HDF member

The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.

llort

mauidog

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #34 on: September 22, 2014, 10:00:28 AM »
good thing they didn't shoot first. at least nobody got hurt...except the cops. at least they out on the loose to catch another day. they should have traned harder

And people who try to hit police with a car, either while the Cops are in their cars or on foot, should be punished and given the max sentence.  If trying to kill or injure a Cop carried 3 x the standard sentence of the normal sentence (special circumstances), then maybe people would be less likely to try it.

If we adopt your thinking, Cops need to shoot BEFORE they get hurt.  So, now all suspects in a car are fair game?

Punish the few who actually use their cars as weapons.  I empathize with the police if they get hurt on the job, but such is the nature of police work.  You can't let fear dictate the laws/rules of engagement. 

We can't give Cops a free pass to shoot everyone to keep themselves safe.  In these cases you linked to, the suspects tried to use their cars as weapons.  Up to that point, they had not done anything that warranted dying over.  Car theft and running from police are not capital offenses, in case you forgot.
An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it.   -- Jeff Cooper

llort

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #35 on: September 22, 2014, 10:44:50 AM »
And people who try to hit police with a car, either while the Cops are in their cars or on foot, should be punished and given the max sentence.  If trying to kill or injure a Cop carried 3 x the standard sentence of the normal sentence (special circumstances), then maybe people would be less likely to try it.

If we adopt your thinking, Cops need to shoot BEFORE they get hurt.  So, now all suspects in a car are fair game?

Punish the few who actually use their cars as weapons.  I empathize with the police if they get hurt on the job, but such is the nature of police work.  You can't let fear dictate the laws/rules of engagement. 

We can't give Cops a free pass to shoot everyone to keep themselves safe.  In these cases you linked to, the suspects tried to use their cars as weapons.  Up to that point, they had not done anything that warranted dying over.  Car theft and running from police are not capital offenses, in case you forgot.

how much more punishment can you add to attempted manslaugher/murder and especially of a cop? these cases are not car thefts. they started as one but once they tried to run ova the cops it became attempted manslaugher/murder. if we adopt your thinking, these cops could be dead if they dont protect themselves. in fact one is in critical condition. remember these are not theft cases anymore. like i said they cant just go shooting everybody in any situation. i said once their lives are in great danger (which was when the criminals used their cars as weapons) they are waranted to shoot to protect themselves. isnt that why you guys have guns for hd?

Question for you and anyone else who disagree. when can a cop use his gun?
« Last Edit: September 22, 2014, 11:17:54 AM by llort »

Rocky

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #36 on: September 22, 2014, 11:22:51 AM »
 If trying to kill or injure a CIVILIAN carried 3 x the standard sentence of the normal sentence (special circumstances), then maybe people would be less likely to try it.
  :thumbsup:
“I ask you to judge me by the enemies I have made.”
                                                           Franklin D. Roosevelt

llort

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #37 on: September 22, 2014, 11:37:09 AM »
If trying to kill or injure a CIVILIAN carried 3 x the standard sentence of the normal sentence (special circumstances), then maybe people would be less likely to try it.
  :thumbsup:

so what, 3x a life sentence? does that really matter? in hawaii no mo death sentence so now what? in places with death sentence what you going do kill him 3x? that still dont stop people from attempting or commiting murder. if you already thinking of murdering no law is going to sway or stop you

mauidog

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #38 on: September 22, 2014, 01:17:02 PM »
so what, 3x a life sentence? does that really matter? in hawaii no mo death sentence so now what? in places with death sentence what you going do kill him 3x? that still dont stop people from attempting or commiting murder. if you already thinking of murdering no law is going to sway or stop you

That's the problem right there:
Quote
that still dont stop people from attempting or [committing] murder.

Isn't that the purpose of laws and law enforcement, to actually deter crime? 

So, the real problem isn't that the suspect tried to hit the Cop with a car.  The real problem was that he was already a criminal (car thief), and he escalated to attempted murder to avoid getting caught (or he was just too stupid to think more than 3 seconds ahead).

If the suspect steals a car, is the answer to shoot him on sight, even IF he doesn't try to kill a Cop?  Sounds like nothing else is working to prevent crime.  Had he never stolen the car, the Cops would have been safe.  Is that not logical?

There has always been and will always be crime.  Sometimes it's justifiable (stealing to feed the family) and others it isn't (stealing to feed a habit).  Justice is supposed to fit the crime.  That's why we have judges and jurors.  Someone needs to weigh the evidence and decide on punishment accordingly.

If a Cop feels his life is in danger, AND there are no other alternatives short of taking a life, then he is justified shooting the suspect.  Deadly force should be the last resort.  Until the suspect escalates to use of deadly force, serious bodily injury, or threatens to use those, nonlethal alternatives should be employed.


An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it.   -- Jeff Cooper

llort

Re: He didn't get shot!
« Reply #39 on: September 22, 2014, 01:54:42 PM »
That's the problem right there:
Isn't that the purpose of laws and law enforcement, to actually deter crime? 

So, the real problem isn't that the suspect tried to hit the Cop with a car.  The real problem was that he was already a criminal (car thief), and he escalated to attempted murder to avoid getting caught (or he was just too stupid to think more than 3 seconds ahead).

If the suspect steals a car, is the answer to shoot him on sight, even IF he doesn't try to kill a Cop?  Sounds like nothing else is working to prevent crime.  Had he never stolen the car, the Cops would have been safe.  Is that not logical?

There has always been and will always be crime.  Sometimes it's justifiable (stealing to feed the family) and others it isn't (stealing to feed a habit).  Justice is supposed to fit the crime.  That's why we have judges and jurors.  Someone needs to weigh the evidence and decide on punishment accordingly.

If a Cop feels his life is in danger, AND there are no other alternatives short of taking a life, then he is justified shooting the suspect.  Deadly force should be the last resort.  Until the suspect escalates to use of deadly force, serious bodily injury, or threatens to use those, nonlethal alternatives should be employed.

i agree with most of what you said. yes laws is meant to deter crime. maybe there wouldnt have been an attempted murder case if the criminal was too scared to steal a car in the first place. however at the same time these criminals above in these specific situations took it to the next level knowing what the consequences are. they were already prepared to take it to the highest level if they were to get caught for stealing. and idk how many times i said that i dont agree they can just shoot them for stealing a car. i said they can shoot them when their life was in danger when the criminals used their car as a deadly weapon. i also disagreed that fist fighting and not using their gun in those situations are whimps. i believe that our leo/military are brave just for signing up. how u gona fist fight a car? like i said the last guy must have tried and lost.