It is meant to be abusive.

This law is nothing more than the progressive socialists running that state enabling their minions to impose their will upon those they consider "non believers".
The fact that more people are killed riding bicycles every year than have been killed by "mass" shootings in the last 14 years be damned. They will not be deterred by the facts or the evidence.
In fact, in the case they cite as the reason for this law, the murderer killed more people with a knife than with a firearm. Notice how they never mention that little tidbit of info.

And therein lays the problem. Most of what mental health professionals do is subjective, not objective. So creating some sort of system whereas the MH professionals would have to objectively evaluate a person without influencing the outcome by their personal bias (say against firearms) is a tremendously difficult task.

The TRO law is not meant to be abusive it is an attempt to provide extra protection. I am not sure if any lives were saved because a TRO took away an abusive spouses firearms or not but I haven't seen any proof that it is just a gun grab by the anti gun crowd. They get the gun back at the end of the TRO, it isn't a permanent revocation of firearms.

The TRO law is not meant to be abusive it is an attempt to provide extra protection. I am not sure if any lives were saved because a TRO took away an abusive spouses firearms or not but I haven't seen any proof that it is just a gun grab by the anti gun crowd. They get the gun back at the end of the TRO, it isn't a permanent revocation of firearms.

Only days after California’s precedent setting bill authorizing confiscatory gun seizures from those deemed a risk becoming law,
the Empire State may be next to examine the concept.

A new bill intended for the state Assembly, modeled after California’s AB1014, was debuted this week by a Manhattan Democrat.
Like the West Coast law, the first of its kind in the nation, it would set up a framework to deny firearm possession to those believed to be dangerous.

“So this is a bill that would permit family members or friends or medical professionals or law enforcement or really anyone who’s concerned
that somebody having to access to guns poses a serious danger to go to a court and present evidence of that, and if the court were persuaded,
they would be able to issue a temporary order preventing the person from acquiring or possessing guns,” Assemblyman Brian Kavanagh, author
 of the legislation, told WAMC this week.

You miss the point. I don't think anyone, and certainly I'm not, suggesting that the TRO process was purposefully designed to abusive, But that being said, it is very clear that it is abused.