I guess it should really be a RE-re-interpretation from the original.
Like this:
(1) 2A was originally intended by the Founders to be an individual right.
(2) Then, through a re-"interpretation" foisted on the public by the antis, it became a "collective" right.
(3) Then this mis-interpretation of Step 2 was recently corrected by the Supreme Court (with the NRA acting as a friend of the Court), and was clearly declared to be an individual right once again.
That's the only way it makes sense to me. He just conveniently ignored Step 1, the "original" original intentions of the Founders in his statement.
I guess

That bullshit about it being a "collective" right has been imprinted on the public's so-called "mind" for quite a few decades.
Now we have to go after the other bullshit about this individual, inalienable, right being subject to "reasonable" restrictions. "Reasonable" means one thing to you and me, and an entirely different thing to the anti-gunners.
Terry, 230RN