"
I do not believe that HPD is the problem. Previous post have mentioned Kaiser sending applicant's medical records to HPD for review. From my conversation with HPD it sounds like now Straub is asking HPD to send officers to their facility to review applicant's records and determine if the applicant should or should not be approved for their permit to acquire because of mental health. HPD's reasonable response is they are not doctors and they cannot make that determination. I believe Kaiser and Straub are the problem and not HPD. I may be wrong, but that is my opinion.
I was told the same thing as Inspector's quote, that HPD will meet with Kaiser and Straub to try to come to an agreement and return things back to "normal". I sincerely believe HPD is trying to work this out so that law abiding citizens can continue to purchase firearms within the current (although ridiculous ) system.
Dogman,
If HPD doesn't want to look at your medical records at their office (Kaiser sending medical records) why would HPD want to go to Straub to look at your medical records. I don't believe any of that. I'm not saying I don't believe you. Doesn't make sense. No hospital in their right mind would allow (legally) police access to that area. They will send your records, with proper authorization but very few people have access to medical records in the hospital. I know, I work there. Furthermore, determining if you are capable of owning a firearm legally is not the doctors job. The chief of police determines that. Your doctor has three choices. Respond with yes there are issues, no there are no issues or does not respond at all. None of the responses will state that you can own a firearm. Wold you Dr Dogman want to say that I can own a firearm. Doctors give medical opinions. You being able to own a firearm is not a medical opinion. Please read 134-2.
I would be curious to know how many folks on this forum have read HRS 134-2 Chapter a, b and c is all you need to read. Please read (several) times and understand it. What amazed me at the range, how many folks did not see in the verbiage of the "letter" that they would be implicating themselves having had mental and drug dependency issues at one time but no longer do. When they finally saw what it said, they all said the same thing. No way... I will never attest to that nor would I want my doctor to either since it"s not true.
Lawyers at the range said "no way was that written by a lawyer and they recommend not agreeing to participate". Don't get twisted by what the balled officer "is saying". Unless you heard it from him, its hearsay. Even if I heard it from him I don't believe it. The reason in my three visits there this past week I heard so many different stories. I look at actions now. "Actions speak louder than words". That is the only thing we should all look at.