I'm definitely a conspiracy theorist on this one.
How do you drop a 110 story buildng into it's own footprint by hitting it on one side with a plane ?
Demolition experts would have a hard time.
One of those two buildings would have toppled.
And why hit it when essentially no one's there ?
Middle of the day those buildings occupy 50,000 people not counting the thousands of tourists.
The two towers were hit at 8:46 and 9:03 AM EST. That's hardly "middle of the day." Many offices may not have even opened for business yet.
90% of the fatalities inside the towers were at or above the impact points. The fires prevented them from escaping. About 200 people jumped to their deaths,
The vast majority of people in the towers were below the impact areas and made it out. 411 emergency workers died in the towers as they collapsed after returning from helping the lower floors evacuate.
The South Tower collapsed after burning for 56 minutes. The North Tower burned for 102 minutes. That's about an hour+ to evacuate the lower floors.
Fewer than half the number killed in the North tower died in the South Tower. When the North Tower was struck at 8:46, many people in the South Tower decided to start evacuating immediately and didn't wait for an order. That helped save people who would have been above the second plane's impact 17 minutes later.
There were 14 saved in Stairwell A that didn't buckle in the collapse of the South Tower.
There were still finding bone fragments as late as 2006 as they were preparing to demolish the damaged Deutsche Bank building.
There are still 1,113 victims who have not been identified.
As far as the building itself, the fire is what started the collapse. Once that started, the floors below the impact area could not sustain the force of the floors above as they collapsed.
The steel was sealed in fireproofing material to protect them against normal fires. That material was blown off the steel supports at impact. The steel was heated for an hour or more. Engineers believe if the fireproofing had remained in place, the towers would still be standing.
The fires weakened the trusses supporting the floors, making the floors sag. The sagging floors pulled on the exterior steel columns causing the exterior columns to bow inward. With the damage to the core columns, the buckling exterior columns could no longer support the buildings, causing them to collapse. Additionally, the report found the towers' stairwells were not adequately reinforced to provide adequate emergency escape for people above the impact zones. the buildings didn't topple because the base was undamaged until the floors above came crashing down with massive force.
That's the official review's findings. The impact of the planes took out 3/4 of the support columns and the buildings stayed up. It was the fire which weakened the structure and caused the collapse.
I don't see a conspiracy other than the hijackers and planners. I lost several friends and coworkers at the Pentagon. For this to be a conspiracy, all 3 targets -- NYC, DC, and Arlington -- would have had to be wrapped up in one big plan. I don't see any real motive that could have driven anyone other than the terrorists to attack these specific symbolic targets on the same day.
If anyone wanted to drag the US into a war in Iraq, I think a less messy and costly plan would have been better. Airlines lost billions of dollars, as did the oil industry that supplies the fuel for airliners. We spent trillions on increased and new security systems in every place they might do some good. Thousands were killed in one day, and tens of thousands over time from the toxic dust when the towers fell.
